← 返回

复发/难治性弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤中二线 liso-cel 的成本效果

英文原题:Cost-effectiveness of second-line lisocabtagene maraleucel in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

查看英文原题

Cost-effectiveness of second-line lisocabtagene maraleucel in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

PubMed 2024/01/23(内容时间) Blood Adv Q1 · IF 7.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

Lisocabtagene maraleucel(liso-cel)是一种嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法,于2022年获得美国食品药品监督管理局批准,用于弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的二线治疗,适用于一线化学免疫治疗后难治性疾病或早期复发的患者。这一决定基于TRANSFORM研究,该研究证明与标准治疗相比,liso-cel改善了无事件生存期。鉴于CAR-T 细胞疗法的高昂成本,尤其是当其转向二线治疗时,成本效益分析对于确定其经济可行性至关重要。

该研究采用带有标准参数函数的分区生存模型,在终生时间范围内评估liso-cel相对于以铂类为基础的化疗后接大剂量化疗和自体造血干细胞移植的成本效益。该分析依赖TRANSFORM和TRANSCEND试验的数据、已有文献和公共数据集来计算增量成本效益比(ICER)。对于一个代表性的60岁美国成年人队列,从医疗保健部门视角来看,liso-cel的ICER为每质量调整生命年(QALY)99 669美元,从社会视角来看为每QALY 68 212美元,确认了其在每QALY 100 000美元阈值下的成本效益。尽管如此,在某些情景下,liso-cel超过了这一基准,但仍处于美国可接受的每QALY 150 000美元范围内。一个关键发现强调了将生产力损失纳入此类分析以捕捉新型疗法更广泛社会价值的重要性。尽管这些疗法提供了显著的临床获益,但其高昂的获取成本和有限的长期数据对其经济可持续性构成了严峻挑战。

展开英文摘要原文

Lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel), a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, received the US Food and Drug Administration approval in 2022 for second-line treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) for patients with refractory disease or early relapse after first-line chemoimmunotherapy. This decision was based on the TRANSFORM study demonstrating improvements in event-free survival with liso-cel compared with standard care. Given the high costs of CAR T-cell therapies, particularly as they transition to second-line treatment, a cost-effectiveness analysis is essential to determine their economic viability. The study used a partitioned survival model with standard parametric functions to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of liso-cel aganist platinum-based chemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation over a lifetime horizon The analysis relied on data from the TRANSFORM and TRANSCEND trials, established literature, and public data sets to calculate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

For a representative cohort of US adults aged 60 years, ICER of liso-cel was $99 669 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) from a health care sector perspective and $68 212 per QALY from a societal perspective, confirming its cost-effectiveness at the $100 000 per QALY threshold. Nonetheless, under certain scenarios, liso-cel surpasses this benchmark but remains within the US acceptable range of $150 000 per QALY.

A key finding underlines the importance of incorporating productivity losses into such analyses to capture the broader societal values of novel therapies. Although these therapies offer substantial clinical benefits, their high acquisition costs and limited long-term data critically challenge their economic sustainability.

论文信息

作者
Choe JH、Yu T、Abramson JS、Abou-El-Enein M
第一作者单位
Department of Pharmaceutical and Health Economics, Alfred E. Mann School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.United States
通讯作者单位
Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.United States
文献类型
美国 NIH 资助研究
期刊
Blood advances2024 Jan 23
原文标识
PubMed 38153350 · DOI 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011793