CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Tisagenlecleucel utilisation and outcomes across refractory, first relapse and multiply relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a retrospective analysis of real-world patterns.
Tisagenlecleucel utilisation and outcomes across refractory, first relapse and multiply relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a retrospective analysis of real-world patterns.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
我们的发现提示,在初治难治性 B-ALL、B-ALL 第二次复发和 B-ALL 首次复发的患者中,tisagenlecleucel 的缓解率和生存率相互重叠。
美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)于2017年批准tisagenlecleucel用于难治性B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病(B-ALL)和二次复发B-ALL。商业化tisagenlecleucel用于首次复发患者的结局此前尚未确立。本研究旨在报告不同适应证下tisagenlecleucel真实世界应用模式及结局,特别包括治疗首次复发患者的情况;该适应证未列入FDA正式批准范围。
我们回顾性分析美国儿童真实世界CAR联盟(PRWCC)参与中心的185名儿童及年轻成人患者,这些患者于2017年8月30日至2020年3月6日期间接受tisagenlecleucel治疗。研究描述真实世界中的难治性B-ALL定义,并按报告的CAR-T 治疗适应证将患者分为难治、首次复发和二次复发B-ALL队列,分析各队列基线特征及输注tisagenlecleucel后的结局。
队列中36%(n=67)患者在首次复发后接受tisagenlecleucel治疗。66例可评估患者中,56例(85%,95%置信区间[CI] 74%–92%)达到形态学完全缓解。1年总生存率(OS)和无事件生存率(EFS)分别为69%(95% CI 58%–82%)和49%(95% CI 37%–64%),与其余患者相比,生存结局无统计学差异(OS:p=0.14;EFS:p=0.39)。值得注意的是,该队列毒性增加,值得进一步研究。有趣的是,30例因初始难治疾病接受治疗的患者中,23例(77%,95% CI 58%–90%)在诱导治疗结束时仅通过流式细胞术和/或二代测序(NGS)检测到微小残留病灶(MRD),按历史形态学标准并不属于难治。解释:研究结果提示,初始难治、二次复发及首次复发B-ALL患者接受tisagenlecleucel后的缓解率和生存率有重叠。我们还指出,难治性B-ALL的定义正在超越形态学残留病灶指标而不断演变。经费来源:St. Baldrick’s/Stand Up 2 Cancer、Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy,以及Virginia and D.K. Ludwig癌症研究基金。
Tisagenlecleucel was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2017 for refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) and B-ALL in 2nd relapse. Outcomes of patients receiving commercial tisagenlecleucel upon 1st relapse have yet to be established. We aimed to report real-world tisagenlecleucel utilisation patterns and outcomes across indications, specifically including patients treated in 1st relapse, an indication omitted from formal FDA approval.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of real-world tisagenlecleucel utilisation patterns across 185 children and young adults treated between August 30, 2017 and March 6, 2020 from centres participating in the Pediatric Real-World CAR Consortium (PRWCC), within the United States. We described definitions of refractory B-ALL used in the real-world setting and categorised patients by reported Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell indication, including refractory, 1st relapse and 2nd relapse B-ALL. We analysed baseline patient characteristics and post-tisagenlecleucel outcomes across defined cohorts.
Thirty-six percent (n = 67) of our cohort received tisagenlecleucel following 1st relapse. Of 66 evaluable patients, 56 (85%, 95% CI 74-92%) achieved morphologic complete response. Overall-survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) at 1-year were 69%, (95% CI 58-82%) and 49%, (95% CI 37-64%), respectively, with survival outcomes statistically comparable to remaining patients (OS; p = 0.14 , EFS; p = 0.39 ). Notably, toxicity was increased in this cohort, warranting further study. Interestingly, of 30 patients treated for upfront refractory disease, 23 (77%, 95% CI 58-90%) had flow cytometry and/or next-generation sequencing (NGS) minimum residual disease (MRD)-only disease at the end of induction, not meeting the historic morphologic definition of refractory. INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggested that tisagenlecleucel response and survival rates overlap across patients treated with upfront refractory B-ALL, B-ALL 2nd relapse and B-ALL in 1st relapse. We additionally highlighted that definitions of refractory B-ALL are evolving beyond morphologic measures of residual disease. FUNDING: St. Baldrick's/Stand Up 2 Cancer, Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Virginia and D.K. Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。