不适合移植的大 B 细胞淋巴瘤二线使用 axicabtagene ciloleucel:ALYCANTE 最终分析
Second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel in large B-cell lymphoma ineligible for transplantation: ALYCANTE final analysis.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:A paradox of choice: Sequencing therapy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
A paradox of choice: Sequencing therapy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
自2017年以来,复发/难治性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的可用治疗发生了显著变化。数十年来基础和转化科学的逐步进展推动了肿瘤免疫学领域的创新。过去10年中,这些进展促使美国食品药品监督管理局为复发/难治性DLBCL治疗先后批准了8种不同疗法。对于初次缓解后复发且适合移植的患者,大剂量治疗联合自体干细胞移植(HDT-ASCT)仍是标准治疗。对于不适合移植或HDT-ASCT后复发的患者,则有多种治疗选择。目前可用于复发/难治性DLBCL患者的治疗包括靶向CD19的单克隆抗体、抗体偶联药物、双特异性抗体、免疫效应细胞产品以及具有其他新作用机制的药物。对于DLBCL早期复发或对初始化学免疫治疗难治的患者,CAR-T 细胞作为二线治疗的应用日益增多。这些策略的临床获益各异,受患者及疾病特征以及既往治疗类型影响。
因此,临床医师治疗复发/难治性DLBCL时可能遇到多种不同情形。目前尚未确定最佳用药顺序,也缺乏关于如何安排这些药物的循证共识。治疗选择大量增加带来了两难:起初不断增加的治疗选项有益于患者和医务人员,但选项持续增多后反而不再带来自由选择,缺乏药物之间的直接比较且需要尽可能改善患者结局,使复发/难治性DLBCL的治疗管理更复杂。本文回顾近期获批的二线及后续治疗药物,总结这些药物应用的真实世界数据,并提出复发/难治性DLBCL的治疗排序框架。
The available treatments for relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have experienced a dramatic change since 2017. Incremental advances in basic and translational science over several decades have led to innovations in immune-oncology. These innovations have culminated in eight separate approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with R/R DLBCL over the last 10 years. High-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (HDT-ASCT) remains the standard of care for transplant-eligible patients who relapse after an initial remission.
For transplant-ineligible patients or for those who relapse following HDT-ASCT, multiple options exist. Monoclonal antibodies targeting CD19, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, immune effector cell products, and other agents with novel mechanisms of action are now available for patients with R/R DLBCL.
There is increasing use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells as second-line therapy for patients with early relapse of DLBCL or those who are refractory to initial chemoimmunotherapy. The clinical benefits of these strategies vary and are influenced by patient and disease characteristics, as well as the type of prior therapy administered.
Therefore, there are multiple clinical scenarios that clinicians might encounter when treating R/R DLBCL. An optimal sequence of drugs has not been established, and there is no evidence-based consensus on how to best order these agents.
This abundance of choices introduces a paradox: proliferating treatment options are initially a boon to patients and providers, but as choices grow further they no longer liberate. Rather, more choices make the management of R/R DLBCL more challenging due to lack of direct comparisons among agents and a desire to maximize patient outcomes.
Here, we provide a review of recently-approved second- and subsequent-line agents, summarize real-world data detailing the use of these medicines, and provide a framework for sequencing therapy in R/R DLBCL.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。