← 返回前沿论文

复发铂敏感上皮性卵巢癌患者化疗期间定时的过继性 T 细胞输注

英文原题:Timed adoptive T cell transfer during chemotherapy in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer.

查看英文原题

Timed adoptive T cell transfer during chemotherapy in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer.

PubMed 2023/11/01(内容时间) J Immunother Cancer Q1 · IF 11.7(JCR 2025)

研究概要

TIL 治疗可与铂类化疗安全联合,但不能与 IFNa 联合。

中文摘要

背景:上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)中T细胞和抑制性髓系细胞的存在分别与较好和较差的临床结局相关。这提示,若能减少髓源性抑制细胞及M2型巨噬细胞造成的免疫抑制,EOC或对自体TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)过继细胞治疗敏感。含铂化疗可减轻此类免疫抑制,可能为T细胞免疫治疗创造治疗窗口。方法:我们启动了一项I/II期试验(NCT04072263),在复发性铂敏感EOC患者接受含铂化疗期间给予TIL。TIL分别在第2、3和第4个化疗周期结束后2周输注。患者分为两组,接受含或不含干扰素α(IFNα)的治疗方案,后者作为预处理及TIL支持方案。主要终点是依据CTCAE V4.03标准评估可行性和安全性;临床应答及免疫调节效应为次要终点。结果:共入组16例患者,所有患者均成功扩增TIL。不联合IFNα、在化疗期间给予TIL(n=13)是安全的;联合IFNα则加重化疗毒性,3例患者中有2例发生剂量限制性血小板减少。14例患者完成完整TIL治疗周期,并进一步接受临床和免疫学应答评估。含铂化疗降低了循环髓系细胞数量和血浆IL-6水平,证实其减轻免疫抑制的作用。记录到3例完全缓解(CR)、9例部分缓解及2例疾病稳定,按实体瘤疗效评价标准V1.1计算,客观缓解率为86%。有趣的是,2例患者的无进展生存期超过其既往无铂间期,其中1例获得特别持久且仍在持续的完全缓解,并伴随免疫抑制持续缓解。结论:TIL治疗可与含铂化疗安全联合,但不宜与IFNα联合。化疗介导的免疫抑制减轻,以及2例患者无铂间期延长,提示应进一步探索在含铂化疗期间恰当安排TIL输注,并可能联合IL-2支持,作为EOC的新治疗选择。

展开英文摘要原文

BACKGROUND: The presence of T cells and suppressive myeloid cells in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) correlate with good and bad clinical outcome, respectively. This suggests that EOC may be sensitive to adoptive cell therapy with autologous tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), provided that immunosuppression by myeloid-derived suppressor cells and M2 macrophages is reduced. Platinum-based chemotherapy can alleviate such immunosuppression, potentially creating a window of opportunity for T cell-based immunotherapy. METHODS: We initiated a phase I/II trial (NCT04072263) in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive EOC receiving TIL during platinum-based chemotherapy. TILs were administered 2 weeks after the second, third and fourth chemotherapy course. Patients were treated in two cohorts with or without interferon- (IFNa), as conditioning and TIL support regimen. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the feasibility and safety according to CTCAE V.4.03 criteria and the clinical response and immune modulatory effects of this treatment were evaluated as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were enrolled. TIL could be successfully expanded for all patients. TIL treatment during chemotherapy without IFNa (n=13) was safe but the combination with IFNa added to the chemotherapy-induced toxicity with 2 out of 3 patients developing thrombocytopenia as dose-limiting toxicity. Fourteen patients completed treatment with a full TIL cycle and were further evaluated for clinical and immunological response. Platinum-based chemotherapy resulted in reduction of circulating myeloid cell numbers and IL-6 plasma levels, confirming its immunosuppression-alleviating effect. Three complete (CR), nine partial responses and two stable diseases were recorded, resulting in an objective response rate of 86% (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors V.1.1). Interestingly, progression free survival that exceeded the previous platinum-free interval was detected in two patients, including an exceptionally long and ongoing CR in one patient that coincided with sustained alleviation of immune suppression. CONCLUSION: TIL therapy can be safely combined with platinum-based chemotherapy but not in combination with IFNa. The chemotherapy-mediated reduction in immunosuppression and the increase in platinum-free interval for two patients warrants further exploration of properly-timed TIL infusions during platinum-based chemotherapy, possibly further benefiting from IL-2 support, as a novel treatment option for EOC patients.

论文信息

作者
Verdegaal EME、Santegoets SJ、Welters MJP、de Bruin L、Visser M、van der Minne CE、de Kok PM、Loof NM
单位
Medical Oncology, Oncode Institute, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands e.m.e.verdegaal@lumc.nl.Netherlands
文献类型
非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Journal for immunotherapy of cancer2023 Nov
原文标识
PubMed 37949617 · DOI 10.1136/jitc-2023-007697