不适合移植的大 B 细胞淋巴瘤二线使用 axicabtagene ciloleucel:ALYCANTE 最终分析
Second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel in large B-cell lymphoma ineligible for transplantation: ALYCANTE final analysis.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Comparative analysis of clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis between nasal and nonnasal extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma.
Comparative analysis of clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis between nasal and nonnasal extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
鼻腔和非鼻腔 ENKTL 患者的临床病理特征及预后不同。鼻腔型患者的 OS 优于非鼻腔型患者,尤其是在门冬酰胺酶时代。
鼻型与非鼻型结外自然杀伤T细胞淋巴瘤(ENKTL)的临床病理特征及预后被认为存在差异。然而,导致这些差异的潜在特征尚未得到很好的阐明,尤其是在门冬酰胺酶治疗时代。
本研究共纳入来自11个医疗中心的1007例新诊断ENKTL患者。收集了临床病理特征和生存数据。采用卡方检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验比较不同组别。使用单变量和多变量Cox比例风险模型筛选预后因素。
总体而言,869例(86.3%)患者为鼻型。与鼻型ENKTL患者相比,非鼻型患者分期更晚,体能状态较差,存在骨髓受累、血清乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)升高和CD56阴性状态(p < 0.05)。鼻型和非鼻型患者的5年总生存期(OS)分别为65.6%和45.0%。鼻型患者的OS优于非鼻型患者,尤其是在东部肿瘤协作组体能状态(ECOG PS)(≥2)、晚期、KPI(HIR/HR)、IPI(HIR/HR)、PINK(HR)和高EBV DNA载量组中。在接受以培门冬酶/左旋门冬酰胺酶为基础方案治疗的患者中,鼻型患者的OS优于非鼻型患者。在调整年龄、分期、ECOG PS评分、LDH、B症状和BM受累等协变量后,结果显示非鼻型部位与ENKTL不良生存相关。
The clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of nasal and nonnasal extranodal natural killer T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL) are considered to be different. However, the underlying features responsible for these differences are not well clarified especially in the era of asparaginase therapy.
In total, 1007 newly diagnosed ENKTL patients from 11 medical centers were included in this study. Clinicopathologic characteristics and survival data were collected. The chi-squared test and Kruskal-Wallis test were utilized for the comparison of different groups. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to screen prognostic factors.
Overall, 869 (86.3%) patients were nasal forms. Compared to patients with nasal ENKTL, nonnasal patients were at more advanced stages and had poor performance status, bone marrow involvement, elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and CD56-negative status (p < 0.05). The 5-year overall survival (OS) for nasal and nonnasal patients were 65.6% and 45.0%, respectively. The OS of nasal forms patients were superior to nonnasal patients, especially in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) (≥2), advanced stage, KPI (HIR/HR), IPI (HIR/HR), PINK (HR), and high EBV DNA load groups. In patients treated with pegaspargase/L-asparaginase-based regimens, the OS of nasal patients was better than that of nonnasal patients. After adjusting the covariates of age, stage, ECOG PS score, LDH, B symptoms, and BM involvement, results showed that the nonnasal site was associated with poor survival of ENKTL.
The clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of nasal and nonnasal ENKTL patients are different. Nasal forms patients had superior OS than nonnasal patients, especially in the era of asparaginase.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。