← 返回

在接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的实体瘤中,真实世界背景下的超进展疾病(HPD)

英文原题:Hyperprogressive Disease (HPD) in Solid Tumours Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in a Real-World Setting.

查看英文原题

Hyperprogressive Disease (HPD) in Solid Tumours Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in a Real-World Setting.

PubMed 2023/01/01(内容时间) Technol Cancer Res Treat Q3 · IF 2.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

本研究旨在确定真实世界环境中接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的实体瘤患者中HPD的患病率,并评估临床病理特征作为HPD潜在生物标志物的价值。

我们对单中心接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的实体瘤患者进行了回顾性分析。评估免疫治疗前和免疫治疗后的影像学以判断HPD,并通过存档肿瘤标本评估其与临床病理因素的相关性,包括TILs和程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)状态。HPD根据Matos等人的定义:符合实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)的疾病进展,可测量病灶最小增大10 mm,加上靶病灶总和较基线增加≥40%,和/或靶病灶总和较基线增加≥20%加上至少2个不同器官出现新病灶。

87例患者中有11例(13%)发生HPD,并与较差的总生存期相关(中位5.5个月 vs 18.3个月,P = .002)。然而,在多因素分析中,仅肝转移(风险比[HR] 4.66,95%置信区间[CI] 2.27-9.56,P < .001)和PD-L1状态(HR 0.53,95% CI 0.30-0.95,P = .03)与生存期显著相关。肝转移的存在与HPD的发生相关(P = .01)。年龄、性别以及单药治疗与联合免疫治疗对HPD无预测作用。PD-L1状态和TILs与HPD无关。

我们在接受免疫治疗的实体瘤患者中发现13%的HPD,与既往系列报道的范围一致。在临床试验环境之外,使用需要比较2次影像学研究的改良标准来评估HPD是可行的。肝转移与HPD风险相关,而TILs和PD-L1状态对HPD无预测作用。

展开英文摘要原文

Introduction: Hyperprogressive disease (HPD) is a state of accelerated tumor growth from cancer immunotherapy, associated with poor outcome. The reported incidence is 6% to 29% among studies using varying definitions of HPD, with no predictive biomarkers. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are prognostic and predictive for immunotherapy benefit in various tumor types, but have only been tested for correlation with HPD in one study. Objectives: The objective of the study was to determine the prevalence of HPD in solid tumor patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in a real-world setting, and to assess clinicopathological features as potential biomarkers for HPD. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of solid tumor patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors at a single institution.

Imaging pre-immunotherapy and postimmunotherapy were assessed for HPD, and correlated against clinicopathological factors, including TILs and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status through archival tumor assessment.

HPD was defined per Matos et al as response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) progressive disease, minimum increase in measurable lesions of 10 mm, plus increase of ≥40% in sum of target lesions compared with baseline and/or increase of ≥20% in sum of target lesions compared with baseline plus new lesions in at least 2 different organs. Results: HPD occurred in 11 of 87 patients (13%), and associated with inferior overall survival (median 5. 5 months vs 18. 3 months, P = . 002).

However, on multivariate analysis, only liver metastases (hazard ratio [HR] 4. 66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2. 27-9. 56, P < . 001) and PD-L1 status (HR 0. 53, 95% CI 0. 30-0. 95, P = . 03) were significantly associated with survival. Presence of liver metastases correlated with occurence of HPD ( P = . 01). Age, sex, and monotherapy versus combination immunotherapy were not predictive for HPD.

PD-L1 status and TILs were not associated with HPD. Conclusions: We found 13% HPD among solid tumor patients treated with immunotherapy, consistent with the range reported in prior series. Assessment for HPD is feasible outside of a clinical trials setting, using modified criteria that require comparison of 2 imaging studies. Liver metastases were associated with risk of HPD, while TILs and PD-L1 status were not predictive for HPD.

论文信息

作者
Kanjanapan Y、Guduguntla G、Varikara AK、Szajer J、Yip D、Cockburn J、Fadia M
第一作者单位
Department of Medical Oncology, The Canberra Hospital, Canberra, Australia.Australia
通讯作者单位
ANU Medical School, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.Australia
期刊
Technology in cancer research & treatment2023 Jan-Dec
原文标识
PubMed 37885403 · DOI 10.1177/15330338231209129