CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Recent Bendamustine Treatment Before Apheresis Has a Negative Impact on Outcomes in Patients With Large B-Cell Lymphoma Receiving Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy.
Recent Bendamustine Treatment Before Apheresis Has a Negative Impact on Outcomes in Patients With Large B-Cell Lymphoma Receiving Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
白细胞单采前近期暴露于苯达莫司汀与 CD19 靶向 CAR-T 细胞治疗后的不良治疗结局相关,因此 CAR-T 细胞治疗候选患者应避免使用苯达莫司汀。
接受CD19靶向嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞治疗的复发/难治性(R/R)大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)患者中,约30%–40%可获得持久缓解。共识指南建议避免在单采前使用苯达莫司汀,但这一情境下缺乏具体数据。本文报告既往苯达莫司汀暴露患者接受CAR-T 后的不同结局。
研究纳入欧洲7个中心接受CAR-T 的患者,按单采前苯达莫司汀暴露分析安全性、疗效及CAR-T 扩增动力学,并进一步评估洗脱间隔和苯达莫司汀剂量的影响。所有苯达莫司汀暴露与未暴露患者疗效比较均采用逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)及倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析。
共纳入439例接受商业化CD19 CAR-T 的R/R LBCL患者,其中80例单采前接受苯达莫司汀。暴露患者单采时CD3+细胞和血小板显著较低。与未暴露患者相比,暴露患者总缓解率(ORR)较低(53%比72%;P<0.01),无进展生存期(PFS)较短(3.1比6.2个月;P=0.04),总生存期(OS)也较短(10.3比23.5个月;P=0.01)。经基线变量调整后,这些差异有所减弱。重点分析单采前苯达莫司汀洗脱时间后发现,近期暴露(<9个月,N=42)患者的ORR较低(40%比72%;P<0.01),PFS较短(1.3比6.2个月;P<0.01),OS也较短(4.6比23.5个月;P<0.01);IPTW和PSM分析后差异仍显著。相反,单采前苯达莫司汀累积剂量并不影响CAR-T 疗效结局。
单采前近期苯达莫司汀暴露与CD19 CAR-T 治疗结局较差相关,因此CAR-T 候选者应避免近期使用苯达莫司汀。
Approximately 30%-40% of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) infused with CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells achieve durable responses. Consensus guidelines suggest avoiding bendamustine before apheresis, but specific data in this setting are lacking. We report distinct outcomes after CAR T-cell therapy according to previous bendamustine exposure.
The study included CAR T-cell recipients from seven European sites. Safety, efficacy, and CAR T-cell expansion kinetics were analyzed according to preapheresis bendamustine exposure. Additional studies on the impact of the washout period and bendamustine dose were performed. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity score matching (PSM) analyses were carried out for all efficacy comparisons between bendamustine-exposed and bendamustine-na ve patients.
The study included 439 patients with R/R LBCL infused with CD19-targeted commercial CAR T cells, of whom 80 had received bendamustine before apheresis. Exposed patients had significantly lower CD3 + cells and platelets at apheresis. These patients had a lower overall response rate (ORR, 53% v 72%; P < .01), a shorter progression-free survival (PFS, 3.1 v 6.2 months; P = .04), and overall survival (OS, 10.3 v 23.5 months; P = .01) in comparison with the bendamustine-na ve group. Following adjustment methods for baseline variables, these differences were mitigated. Focusing on the impact of bendamustine washout before apheresis, those with recent (<9 months) exposure (N = 42) displayed a lower ORR (40% v 72%; P < .01), shorter PFS (1.3 v 6.2 months; P < .01), and OS (4.6 v 23.5 months; P < .01) in comparison with bendamustine-na ve patients. These differences remained significant after IPTW and PSM analysis. Conversely, the cumulative dose of bendamustine before apheresis did not affect CAR-T efficacy outcomes.
Recent bendamustine exposure before apheresis was associated with negative treatment outcomes after CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy and should be therefore avoided in CAR T-cell candidates.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。