CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Improved outcomes of large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with CD19 CAR T in the UK over time.
Improved outcomes of large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with CD19 CAR T in the UK over time.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
CD19靶向嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞治疗大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)取得成功,但其毒性和实施上的物流挑战抵消了部分获益;现货型疗法(如CD20×CD3双特异性抗体)或可克服这些困难。
然而,将CAR-T 疗效作为复发/难治性(R/R)LBCL标准治疗对照时,需要考虑实施CAR-T 这类新型复杂疗法所带来的学习曲线。为此,研究分析了英国726例计划接受CD19 CAR-T 治疗的R/R LBCL患者,比较全国CAR-T 项目首年(时期1;2019年)与较近治疗时期(时期2;2020–2022年)的结局。与时期1相比,时期2脱落率显著降低(17%比27%,p=0.001),无进展生存期改善(1年PFS 50%比32%,p<0.001),总生存期亦改善(1年OS 60%比40%,p<0.001)。研究还观察到桥接治疗应用增加、桥接治疗结局改善、托珠单抗/糖皮质激素使用增加,以及高级别细胞因子释放综合征(4%比9%,p=0.01)和重症监护病房入住率(20%比32%,p=0.001)下降。
结果显示CAR-T 结局随时间显著改善,提示将CAR-T 与R/R LBCL新治疗方案比较时,应采用最新临床数据。
The success of CD19 Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) has been partially offset by toxicity and logistical challenges, which off-the-shelf agents like CD20xCD3 bispecific antibodies might potentially overcome.
However, when using CAR T outcomes as the 'standard-of-care comparator for relapsed/refractory (r/r) LBCL, a potential learning curve with implementing a novel, complex therapy like CAR T needs to be considered. To address this, we analysed 726 UK patients intended to be treated with CD19 CAR T for r/r LBCL and compared outcomes between the first year of the national CAR T programme (Era 1; 2019) and the more recent treatment era (Era 2; 2020-2022).
We identified significant improvements for Era 2 versus Era 1 in dropout rate (17% vs. 27%, p = 0. 001), progression-free survival (1-year PFS 50% vs. 32%, p < 0. 001) and overall survival (1-year OS 60% vs. 40%, p < 0. 001).
We also observed increased use of bridging therapy, improvement in bridging outcomes, more tocilizumab/corticosteroid use, reduced high-grade cytokine release syndrome (4% vs. 9%, p = 0. 01) and intensive care unit admissions (20% vs. 32%, p = 0. 001).
Our results demonstrate significant improvement in CAR T outcomes over time, highlighting the importance of using up-to-date clinical data when comparing CAR T against new treatment options for r/r LBCL.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。