不适合移植的大 B 细胞淋巴瘤二线使用 axicabtagene ciloleucel:ALYCANTE 最终分析
Second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel in large B-cell lymphoma ineligible for transplantation: ALYCANTE final analysis.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Clinical features, prognostic stratification, and treatment of advanced-stage non-nasal type extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: a multi-institutional real-world study.
Clinical features, prognostic stratification, and treatment of advanced-stage non-nasal type extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma: a multi-institutional real-world study.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
本研究旨在探讨晚期非鼻型结外自然杀伤/T细胞淋巴瘤(ENKTCL)的临床特征、预后及治疗。本真实世界研究回顾性分析了近10-15年间来自中国两家大型肿瘤中心的新诊断晚期非鼻型ENKTCL患者56例,并筛选同期收治的新诊断晚期鼻型ENKTCL 139例进行对比。与非鼻型ENKTCL相比,非鼻型ENKTCL的Ki-67表达水平显著更高(P = 0.011)。中位随访时间为75.03个月,非鼻型组的生存结局略差于鼻型组,但差异无统计学意义(中位总生存期(OS):14.57 vs. 21.53个月,5年OS:28.0% vs. 38.5%,P = 0.120)。在非鼻型组中,东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)评分≥ 2(风险比(HR)= 2.18,P = 0.039)和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)升高(HR = 2.44,P = 0.012)与更差的OS显著相关。
在本非鼻型ENKTCL队列中,一线以吉西他滨为基础的化疗方案相较于非吉西他滨为基础的方案显示出疗效和生存结局略有改善的趋势(客观缓解率:91.7% vs. 63.6%,P = 0.144;完全缓解率:50.0% vs. 33.3%,P = 0.502;中位无进展生存期:10.43 vs. 3.40个月,P = 0.106;中位OS:25.13 vs. 9.30个月,P = 0.125),这需要在更大样本量的研究中进一步验证。晚期非鼻型患者经过合理治疗可获得与鼻型病例相当的预后。改良列线图修订指数(包括年龄、ECOG评分和LDH)和改良国际预后指数(包括年龄、ECOG评分、LDH和结外受累数目)在非鼻型ENKTCL中有效发挥预后分层作用。
The present study aimed to investigate the clinical features, prognosis, and treatment of advanced-stage non-nasal type extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTCL). This real-world study retrospectively reviewed 56 newly diagnosed advanced-stage non-nasal type ENKTCL patients from two large-scale Chinese cancer centers in the last 10-15 years and screened 139 newly diagnosed advanced-stage nasal type ENKTCLs admitted during the same period for comparison. The non-nasal type ENKTCLs exhibited significantly higher Ki-67 expression levels compared to nasal type disease (P = 0. 011). With a median follow-up duration of 75. 03 months, the non-nasal group showed slightly inferior survival outcomes without statistically significant differences compared to the nasal group (median overall survival (OS): 14. 57 vs. 21. 53 months, 5-year OS: 28. 0% vs. 38. 5%, P = 0. 120). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score ≥ 2 (hazard ratio (HR) = 2. 18, P = 0.
039) and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) elevation (HR = 2. 44, P = 0. 012) were significantly correlated with worse OS in the non-nasal group. First-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy regimens showed a trend toward slightly improved efficacy and survival outcomes compared to non-gemcitabine-based ones in the present cohort of non-nasal ENKTCLs (objective response rate: 91. 7% vs. 63. 6%, P = 0. 144; complete response rate: 50. 0% vs. 33. 3%, P = 0. 502; median progression-free survival: 10. 43 vs. 3.
40 months, P = 0. 106; median OS: 25. 13 vs. 9. 30 months, P = 0. 125), which requires further validation in larger sample size studies. Advanced-stage non-nasal type patients could achieve comparable prognosis with nasal cases after rational therapy. The modified nomogram-revised index (including age, ECOG score, and LDH) and modified international prognostic index (including age, ECOG score, LDH, and number of extranodal involvement) functioned effectively for prognostic stratification in non-nasal type ENKTCLs.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。