← 返回

接受过继细胞疗法(ACT)治疗癌症的患者所使用的患者报告结局(PRO)工具:一项系统综述

英文原题:Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments used in patients undergoing adoptive cell therapy (ACT) for the treatment of cancer: a systematic review.

查看英文原题

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments used in patients undergoing adoptive cell therapy (ACT) for the treatment of cancer: a systematic review.

PubMed 2023/09/30(内容时间) Syst Rev Q1 · IF 5.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

已确定的 PRO 均非专为 ACT 设计。应考虑现有工具的适用性。应考虑在急性期更频繁地收集数据、随后在随访期间减少频率是否合适。应考虑是否一种工具适用于所有时间点,还是应根据治疗后时间对工具进行调整。需要更多研究来确定 PRO 评估的确切时间点,并需要开展患者定性研究,以确定在整个治疗和随访期间对患者最重要的问题。

研究思路结论见上方概要

过继性细胞治疗(ACT)是一个快速发展的领域。患者报告结局(PROs)允许患者报告治疗期间及治疗后治疗对其生活质量的影响。本系统综述旨在描述ACT肿瘤治疗中所使用的PROs的广度,并为未来在该患者群体中使用PROs提供指导。

于2021年8月由两名评审员进行了系统检索(MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Embase和CINAHL)。检索词涵盖以下内容:“过继细胞疗法”、“患者报告结局”和“癌症”。如果研究使用PRO测量工具报告ACT的影响,则纳入研究。对PROs的方法学质量进行了评估。对任何相关论文进行了前向和后向参考文献检索。基于Cochrane和Revenson的高质量研究分类标准应用了质量分级量表。由两名研究人员提取研究及所纳入PROs的关键数据并制成表格。

共识别出109篇论文;纳入11篇论文。大多数研究为单臂试验或观察性研究。共识别出22种不同的PRO;没有一种是ACT特异性的。PROMIS-29和EQ-5D是最常用的。很少有研究在最初1-2周内收集PRO数据。4项研究对患者随访超过一年,另有4项研究对患者随访约3个月。

展开英文摘要原文

A systematic search was conducted (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase and CINAHL) in August 2021 by two reviewers. Search terms covered the following: "adoptive cell therapy", "patient-reported outcomes" and "cancer". Studies were included if they used a PRO measure to report the impact of ACT. The methodological quality of PROs was assessed. Forward and backward reference searching was conducted of any relevant papers. A quality grading scale was applied based on Cochrane and Revenson criteria for classification of high-quality studies. Key data from the studies and the included PROs was extracted by two researchers and tabulated.

One-hundred nine papers were identified; 11 papers were included. The majority of studies were single-arm trials or observational studies. Twenty-two different PROs were identified; none was ACT specific. The PROMIS-29 and EQ-5D were most commonly used. Few studies collected PRO data in the first 1-2 weeks. Four studies followed patients up for over a year, and a further four studies followed patients for approximately 3 months. DISCUSSION: None of the PROs identified have been designed specifically for ACT. Appropriateness of existing instruments should be considered. It should be considered whether it is appropriate to collect data more frequently in the acute stage and then less frequently during follow-up. It should be considered if one tool is suitable at all time points or if the tool should be adapted depending on time since treatment. More research is needed to identify the exact timings of PRO assessments, and qualitative work with patients is needed to determine the most important issues for them throughout the treatment and follow-up.

论文信息

作者
Taylor S、Law K、Coomber-Moore J、Davies M、Thistlethwaite F、Calvert M、Aiyegbusi O、Yorke J
单位
Christie Patient Centred Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M204BX, UK. sally.taylor38@nhs.net.United Kingdom
文献类型
系统综述 · 非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Systematic reviews2023 Sep 30
原文标识
PubMed 37777816 · DOI 10.1186/s13643-023-02337-8