CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Axicabtagene ciloleucel compared to standard of care in Swedish patients with large B-cell lymphoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis of the ZUMA-7 trial.
Axicabtagene ciloleucel compared to standard of care in Swedish patients with large B-cell lymphoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis of the ZUMA-7 trial.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
在完成一线化学免疫治疗后早期复发/难治、拟接受移植的弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者中,二线使用 axi-cel 治疗在瑞典情境下相较标准治疗具有成本效益。
本研究旨在评估瑞典成人移植候选弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者二线使用阿基仑赛(axi-cel)与标准治疗(SOC)的成本效果。这些患者在一线化学免疫治疗结束后12个月内复发,或对一线治疗无应答,即早期复发/难治。
采用三状态分区生存模型评估成本效果,并利用混合治愈模型将ZUMA-7试验(NCT03391466)的事件时间数据外推至观察期之后。通过敏感性分析和情景分析检验基准结果的稳健性,其中一项分析假设SOC组后续治疗不转换为试验方案外CAR-T 治疗。
模型估计axi-cel相较SOC在50年终身时间范围内每增加一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本效果比(ICER)为534,704瑞典克朗(50,303欧元);增量成本为812,944瑞典克朗(76,479欧元),增量QALY为1.52。按每QALY 1,000,000瑞典克朗(94,077欧元)的支付意愿阈值进行概率敏感性分析时,axi-cel在73%的模拟中具有成本效果。若不计治疗转换的成本和效果,情景分析中的ICER为694,351瑞典克朗(65,313欧元)。
对于一线化学免疫治疗后早期复发/难治且拟行移植的DLBCL患者,瑞典情境下二线axi-cel相较SOC具有成本效果。二线给予axi-cel可提高更多患者获得治愈的可能性,既带来生存获益,也可减轻生活质量负担及后续治疗费用,对患者和社会均有利。
Cost-effectiveness was assessed using a three-state partitioned survival model. Mixture cure models were used to extrapolate time-to-event data from the ZUMA-7 trial (NCT03391466) beyond the observational period. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to test the robustness of the base case results, including an analysis that assumed no switching to off-protocol CAR T-cell therapy in subsequent lines in the SOC arm.
The model estimated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of SEK 534,704 (EUR 50,303) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained over a lifetime horizon of 50 years, with an incremental cost of SEK 812,944 (EUR 76,479) and incremental QALY of 1.52 for axi-cel compared with SOC. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that axi-cel was cost-effective in 73% of the simulations when assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of SEK 1,000,000 (EUR 94,077) per QALY. The ICER was SEK 694,351 (EUR 65,313) in the scenario analysis where the costs and effects of treatment switching were not included.
2L treatment with axi-cel in transplant-intended DLBCL patients with early r/r after completing 1L chemoimmunotherapy was cost-effective compared to SOC in a Swedish setting. Administering axi-cel in 2L is cost-effective as it enhances the possibility of curing more patients, resulting in not just a survival advantage, but also a reduction in the burden on quality of life and cost of subsequent therapy. This will be advantageous to both patients and society.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。