← 返回

西达基奥仑赛用于 CARTITUDE-1 研究中既往接受异基因干细胞移植的患者

英文原题:Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in Patients With Prior Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant in the CARTITUDE-1 Study.

查看英文原题

Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel in Patients With Prior Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant in the CARTITUDE-1 Study.

PubMed 2023/08/22(内容时间) Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk Q1 · IF 4.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

在 CARTITUDE-1 研究中,有或无既往异基因造血干细胞移植(alloSCT)史的患者之间,cilta-cel 的疗效和安全性相当。

中文摘要

既往接受异基因造血干细胞移植(alloSCT)的患者通常被排除在CAR-T 细胞治疗试验之外,因为制备的细胞中可能包含异基因T细胞。西达基奥仑赛(cilta-cel)在经多线治疗的复发/难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者中显示早期、深度且持久的应答,安全性可管理。本研究回顾分析了CARTITUDE-1研究中输注cilta-cel前曾接受alloSCT的患者。

符合CARTITUDE-1条件者年龄至少18岁,既往接受至少3线治疗,或对蛋白酶体抑制剂(PI)和免疫调节药物(IMiD)均为双重难治,且曾接受PI、IMiD和抗CD38抗体治疗。活动性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)患者,或采集单采细胞前6个月内接受alloSCT者被排除。患者在淋巴细胞清除治疗后5至7天接受cilta-cel。

7例患者既往治疗线数中位数为9线(范围6–14线),距alloSCT的中位时间为5.1年(范围2.7–6.2年)。cilta-cel输注后中位随访27.7个月,总缓解率为85.7%(n=6)。安全性总体上与既往未接受alloSCT者一致(细胞因子释放综合征分别为85.7%和95.6%;免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征分别为14.3%和16.7%)。一名既往接受alloSCT的患者出现3级治疗期间不良事件,包括运动和神经认知障碍/帕金森综合征。未报告GVHD病例。两名患者因不良事件死亡(一例死于治疗相关肺脓肿,另一例死于无关的肝衰竭)。

CARTITUDE-1中既往接受和未接受alloSCT患者的cilta-cel疗效和安全性相当。仍需开展更多研究,以充分阐明alloSCT后CAR-T 治疗的适用性。

展开英文摘要原文

Patients with prior allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) are typically excluded from trials of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies, because their engineered cells may include allogeneic T cells. Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) demonstrated early, deep, durable responses and manageable safety in heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients. We retrospectively analyzed patients who received alloSCT prior to cilta-cel in CARTITUDE-1.

Patients eligible for CARTITUDE-1 were 18 years, had 3 prior lines of therapy (LOT) or were double refractory to a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) and had received a PI, IMiD, and anti-CD38 antibody. Patients with active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) or had alloSCT within 6 months before apheresis were excluded. Patients received cilta-cel 5 to 7 days after lymphodepletion.

Patients (N = 7) received median 9 prior LOTs (range, 6-14); median time since alloSCT was 5.1 years (range, 2.7-6.2). At median follow-up 27.7 months after cilta-cel infusion, overall response rate was 85.7% (n = 6). The safety profile was generally consistent with patients without alloSCT as prior therapy (cytokine release syndrome, 85.7% vs. 95.6%, respectively; immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, 14.3% vs. 16.7%). One patient with prior alloSCT had grade 3 movement and neurocognitive treatment-emergent adverse events/parkinsonism. No GVHD cases were reported. Two patients died due to adverse events (treatment-related lung abscess; unrelated liver failure).

Cilta-cel efficacy and safety were comparable between CARTITUDE-1 patients with and without prior alloSCT. Additional studies are needed to fully elucidate the suitability of CAR-T cell therapy in the post-alloSCT setting.

论文信息

作者
Htut M、Dhakal B、Cohen AD、Martin T、Berdeja JG、Usmani SZ、Agha M、Jackson CC
第一作者单位
City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA.United States
通讯作者单位
Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY. Electronic address: sundar.jagannath@mountsinai.org.United States
文献类型
非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2023 Dec
原文标识
PubMed 37716872 · DOI 10.1016/j.clml.2023.08.012