← 返回

强化治疗可改善新诊断晚期结外 NK/T 细胞淋巴瘤的长期生存:一项多机构真实世界研究

英文原题:Intensive therapy can improve long-term survival in newly diagnosed, advanced-stage extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: A multi-institutional, real-world study.

查看英文原题

Intensive therapy can improve long-term survival in newly diagnosed, advanced-stage extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: A multi-institutional, real-world study.

PubMed 2023/08/04(内容时间) Int J Cancer Q2 · IF 4.9(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

本研究探讨了晚期结外自然杀伤/T细胞淋巴瘤(ENKTL)的治疗与预后。中位随访时间为75.03个月,195例新诊断的III/IV期ENKTL患者的中位总生存期(mOS)为19.43个月,估计1年、2年、3年和5年OS分别为59.5%、46.3%、41.8%和35.1%。化疗(CT)+放疗(RT)与单纯CT相比(P = .007),以及造血干细胞移植(HSCT)与非HSCT相比(P < .001),均改善了OS。对于≤60岁且不适合HSCT的患者,其他达到完全缓解的治疗方案带来了相当的OS(P = .141)。9例曾接受西达本胺治疗的患者达到中位无进展生存期(mPFS)和中位总生存期(mOS)分别为53.63个月(范围,3.47-92.33)和54.80个月(范围,5.50-95.70),其中4例接受西达本胺维持治疗(MT)的患者达到mPFS和mOS分别为55.83个月(范围,53.27-92.33)和60.65个月(范围,53.70-95.70),可能为非HSCT患者提供了一种替代选择。

非蒽环类(ANT-)与含蒽环类方案相比、含门冬酰胺酶(Aspa)与不含Aspa方案相比、含吉西他滨(Gem)与不含Gem方案相比,分别延长了PFS(P = .031;P = .005;P = .009)和OS(P = .010;P = .086;P = .003)。多因素分析表明,含Gem方案改善了PFS(HR = 0.691,P = .061)和OS(HR = 0.624,P = .037)。与仅含Gem或Aspa的方案相比,Gem + Aspa联合方案略微改善了PFS和OS(P > 0.05)。提出了一线“强化治疗”,包括CT(特别是Gem + Aspa方案)、RT、HSCT和替代性西达本胺MT,可改善晚期ENKTL的长期生存。正在进行的前瞻性临床研究可能进一步揭示西达本胺MT的价值。

展开英文摘要原文

The study investigated the treatment and prognosis of advanced-stage extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL). With a median follow-up of 75. 03 months, the median overall survival (mOS) for the 195 newly diagnosed stage III/IV ENKTL patients was 19. 43 months, and estimated 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year OS were 59. 5%, 46. 3%, 41. 8% and 35. 1%, respectively. Chemotherapy (CT) + radiotherapy (RT) compared to CT alone (P = . 007), and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) compared to non-HSCT (P < . 001), both improved OS. For patients ≤60 years and ineligible for HSCT, other therapies with complete remission led to comparable OS (P = . 141). Nine patients ever treated with chidamide achieved a median progression-free survival (mPFS) and mOS of 53. 63 (range, 3. 47-92. 33) and 54. 80 (range, 5. 50-95. 70) months, and four with chidamide maintenance therapy (MT) achieved a mPFS and mOS of 55.

83 (range, 53. 27-92. 33) and 60. 65 (range, 53. 70-95. 70) months, possibly providing an alternative option for non-HSCT patients. Non-anthracycline (ANT)- compared to ANT-, asparaginase (Aspa)- compared to non-Aspa- and gemcitabine (Gem)- compared to non-Gem-based regimens, prolonged PFS (P = . 031; P = . 005; P = . 009) and OS (P = . 010; P = . 086; P = . 003), respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that Gem-based regimens improved PFS (HR = 0.

691, P = . 061) and OS (HR = 0. 624, P = . 037). Gem + Aspa combinations slightly improved PFS and OS compared to regimens containing Gem or Aspa alone (P > 0. 05). First-line "intensive therapy," including CT (particularly Gem + Aspa regimens), RT, HSCT and alternative chidamide MT, was proposed and could improve long-term survival for advanced-stage ENKTLs. Ongoing prospective clinical studies may shed further light on the value of chidamide MT.

论文信息

作者
Wei YC、Qi F、Zheng BM、Zhang CG、Xie Y、Chen B、Liu WX、Liu WP
单位
Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.China
文献类型
多中心研究 · 非美国政府资助研究
期刊
International journal of cancer2023 Nov 1
原文标识
PubMed 37539660 · DOI 10.1002/ijc.34672