不适合移植的大 B 细胞淋巴瘤二线使用 axicabtagene ciloleucel:ALYCANTE 最终分析
Second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel in large B-cell lymphoma ineligible for transplantation: ALYCANTE final analysis.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Intensive therapy can improve long-term survival in newly diagnosed, advanced-stage extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: A multi-institutional, real-world study.
Intensive therapy can improve long-term survival in newly diagnosed, advanced-stage extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: A multi-institutional, real-world study.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
本研究探讨了晚期结外自然杀伤/T细胞淋巴瘤(ENKTL)的治疗与预后。中位随访时间为75.03个月,195例新诊断的III/IV期ENKTL患者的中位总生存期(mOS)为19.43个月,估计1年、2年、3年和5年OS分别为59.5%、46.3%、41.8%和35.1%。化疗(CT)+放疗(RT)与单纯CT相比(P = .007),以及造血干细胞移植(HSCT)与非HSCT相比(P < .001),均改善了OS。对于≤60岁且不适合HSCT的患者,其他达到完全缓解的治疗方案带来了相当的OS(P = .141)。9例曾接受西达本胺治疗的患者达到中位无进展生存期(mPFS)和中位总生存期(mOS)分别为53.63个月(范围,3.47-92.33)和54.80个月(范围,5.50-95.70),其中4例接受西达本胺维持治疗(MT)的患者达到mPFS和mOS分别为55.83个月(范围,53.27-92.33)和60.65个月(范围,53.70-95.70),可能为非HSCT患者提供了一种替代选择。
非蒽环类(ANT-)与含蒽环类方案相比、含门冬酰胺酶(Aspa)与不含Aspa方案相比、含吉西他滨(Gem)与不含Gem方案相比,分别延长了PFS(P = .031;P = .005;P = .009)和OS(P = .010;P = .086;P = .003)。多因素分析表明,含Gem方案改善了PFS(HR = 0.691,P = .061)和OS(HR = 0.624,P = .037)。与仅含Gem或Aspa的方案相比,Gem + Aspa联合方案略微改善了PFS和OS(P > 0.05)。提出了一线“强化治疗”,包括CT(特别是Gem + Aspa方案)、RT、HSCT和替代性西达本胺MT,可改善晚期ENKTL的长期生存。正在进行的前瞻性临床研究可能进一步揭示西达本胺MT的价值。
The study investigated the treatment and prognosis of advanced-stage extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL). With a median follow-up of 75. 03 months, the median overall survival (mOS) for the 195 newly diagnosed stage III/IV ENKTL patients was 19. 43 months, and estimated 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year OS were 59. 5%, 46. 3%, 41. 8% and 35. 1%, respectively. Chemotherapy (CT) + radiotherapy (RT) compared to CT alone (P = . 007), and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) compared to non-HSCT (P < . 001), both improved OS. For patients ≤60 years and ineligible for HSCT, other therapies with complete remission led to comparable OS (P = . 141). Nine patients ever treated with chidamide achieved a median progression-free survival (mPFS) and mOS of 53. 63 (range, 3. 47-92. 33) and 54. 80 (range, 5. 50-95. 70) months, and four with chidamide maintenance therapy (MT) achieved a mPFS and mOS of 55.
83 (range, 53. 27-92. 33) and 60. 65 (range, 53. 70-95. 70) months, possibly providing an alternative option for non-HSCT patients. Non-anthracycline (ANT)- compared to ANT-, asparaginase (Aspa)- compared to non-Aspa- and gemcitabine (Gem)- compared to non-Gem-based regimens, prolonged PFS (P = . 031; P = . 005; P = . 009) and OS (P = . 010; P = . 086; P = . 003), respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that Gem-based regimens improved PFS (HR = 0.
691, P = . 061) and OS (HR = 0. 624, P = . 037). Gem + Aspa combinations slightly improved PFS and OS compared to regimens containing Gem or Aspa alone (P > 0. 05). First-line "intensive therapy," including CT (particularly Gem + Aspa regimens), RT, HSCT and alternative chidamide MT, was proposed and could improve long-term survival for advanced-stage ENKTLs. Ongoing prospective clinical studies may shed further light on the value of chidamide MT.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。