CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Salvage radiotherapy in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma after failure of CAR T-cell therapy.
Salvage radiotherapy in relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma after failure of CAR T-cell therapy.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
尽管CD19靶向嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法已成功治疗复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL),但CAR-T 治疗失败后仍亟需有效挽救策略。
本研究开展多机构回顾性研究,分析CAR-T(阿基仑赛[axi-cel]或替沙仑赛[tisa-cel])治疗后复发并接受挽救治疗的患者,挽救方式包括单独放疗(RT)、单独全身治疗或联合治疗。共120例CAR-T 后复发LBCL患者接受挽救治疗,其中单独放疗25例、联合治疗15例、单独全身治疗80例。自CAR-T 输注起中位随访10.2个月(四分位距5.2–20.9个月)。78%(93例)患者的复发部位此前在CAR-T 治疗前曾受累。CAR-T 失败后,54例患者共93个病灶接受挽救放疗,中位剂量为30 Gy(范围4–50.4 Gy),中位分割次数为10次(范围1–28次)。
81个可评估病灶的1年局部控制率为84%。单变量分析显示,接受全面放疗(与局灶放疗相比)的患者自放疗开始起总生存期(OS)中位数显著较长(19.1个月比3.0个月;P<0.001)。接受全面放疗的29例患者中有23例为局限期疾病。该亚组中,单独放疗患者与放疗后追加其他治疗患者的OS中位数无差异(log-rank P=0.2)。多变量生存分析显示,CAR-T 后达到部分缓解或完全缓解与更优OS独立相关(风险比0.5;95%置信区间0.3–0.9;P=0.01)。研究结果提示,放疗可控制CAR-T 治疗后复发LBCL的局部病灶,尤其对接受全面放疗的局限期复发患者。
Despite the success of CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR T)-cell therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), there is a need for effective salvage strategies post-CAR T-cell therapy failure.
We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study of patients who relapsed following CAR T-cell therapy (axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel] or tisagenlecleucel [tisa-cel]) and received salvage therapies (radiation therapy [RT] alone, systemic therapy alone, or combined modality therapy [CMT]). A total of 120 patients with post-CAR T relapsed LBCL received salvage therapies (RT alone, 25 patients; CMT, 15 patients; systemic therapy alone, 80 patients). The median follow-up from CAR T-cell infusion was 10. 2 months (interquartile range, 5. 2-20. 9 months). Failure occurred in previously involved sites prior to CAR T-cell therapy in 78% of patients (n=93). A total of 93 sites were irradiated in 54 patients who received any salvage RT post-CAR T failure.
The median dose/fractionation were 30 Gy (range, 4-50. 4 Gy) and 10 fractions (range, 1-28 fractions). The 1-year local control rate for the 81 assessable sites was 84%. On univariate analysis, the median overall survival (OS) from the start date of RT was significantly higher among patients who received comprehensive RT versus focal RT (19. 1 months vs. 3. 0 months; P=<0. 001).
Twenty-three of 29 patients who received comprehensive RT had limited-stage disease. Among these, there was no difference in median OS among the patients who received RT alone versus those who received RT followed by additional therapies (log-rank P=0. 2). On multivariate survival analysis, achieving PR or CR post-CAR T (hazard ratio =0. 5; 95% confidence interval: 0. 3-0. 9; P=0. 01) was independently associated with superior OS.
Our findings suggest that RT can provide local control for LBCL relapsed post-CAR T-cell therapy, particularly in patients with limited-stage relapsed disease treated with comprehensive RT.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。