CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Efficacy and Toxicity of CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Lymphoma in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Efficacy and Toxicity of CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Lymphoma in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法在实体器官移植受者中的安全性和有效性尚不明确,因为该患者群体中可用的数据很少。CAR-T 细胞疗法理论上存在损害移植器官功能的风险;反之,器官移植相关的免疫抑制也可能改变CAR-T 细胞的功能。鉴于移植后淋巴增殖性疾病较为常见,且通常难以用常规化学免疫疗法治愈,了解在实体器官移植受者中实施针对淋巴瘤的CAR-T 细胞疗法的风险与获益至关重要。
我们旨在确定CAR-T 细胞疗法在实体器官移植受者中的有效性及相关不良反应,包括细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)、免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)以及实体器官移植功能受损。
我们对因非霍奇金淋巴瘤接受CAR-T 细胞治疗的成人实体器官移植受者进行了系统综述和meta分析。主要结局包括有效性,定义为总体缓解(OR)、完全缓解(CR)、无进展生存期和总生存期,以及CRS和ICANS的发生率。次要结局包括移植器官丢失率、器官功能受损率以及免疫抑制剂方案的调整。经过系统性文献综述和2名审查者筛选流程,我们确定了10项适合描述性分析的研究和4项适合meta分析的研究。在所有患者中,69%(35例中的24例)对CAR-T 细胞疗法产生缓解,52%(35例中的18例)达到CR。任何级别的 CRS 发生率为 83%(35 例中 29 例),3 级 CRS 发生率为 9%(35 例中 3 例)。60% 的患者(35 例中 21 例)发生 ICANS,34%(35 例中 12 例)发生 3 级 ICANS。所有患者中任何级别 5 级毒性的发生率为 11%(35 例中 4 例)。14% 的患者(35 例中 5 例)发生移植器官丢失。
22 例患者曾暂停免疫抑制剂治疗,但其中 68%(22 例中 15 例)最终重新开始使用。在纳入 meta 分析的研究中,合并 OR 率为 70%(95% CI,29.2% 至 100%;I 2 = 71%),合并 CR 率为 46%(95% CI,25.4% 至 67.8%;I 2 = 29%)。任何级别 CRS 和 3 级 CRS 的发生率分别为 88%(95% CI,69% 至 99%;I 2 = 0%)和 5%(95% CI,0% 至 21%;I 2 = 0%)。任何级别 ICANS 和 3 级 ICANS 的发生率分别为 54%(95% CI,9% 至 96%;I 2 = 68%)和 40%(95% CI,3% 至 85%;I 2 = 63%)。CAR-T 细胞疗法在实体器官移植受者中的疗效与既往研究性研究中报道的普通人群相当,在 CRS、ICANS 和移植器官损害方面具有可接受的毒性特征。需要进一步研究以确定对该患者群体器官功能的长期影响、持续缓解率以及 CAR-T 输注前后的最佳实践。
The safety and efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients is poorly understood, given the paucity of available data in this patient population. There is a theoretical risk of compromising transplanted organ function with CAR T cell therapy; conversely, organ transplantation-related immunosuppression can alter the function of CAR T cells.
Given the prevalence of post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease, which often can be difficult to treat with conventional chemoimmunotherapy, understanding the risks and benefits of delivering lymphoma-directed CAR T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients is of utmost importance.
We sought to determine the efficacy of CAR T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients as well as the associated adverse effects, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and compromised solid organ transplant function.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of adult recipients of solid organ transplant who received CAR T cell therapy for non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Primary outcomes included efficacy, defined as overall response (OR), complete response (CR), progression-free survival, and overall survival, as well as rates of CRS and ICANS. Secondary outcomes included rates of transplanted organ loss, compromised organ function, and alterations to immunosuppressant regimens. After a systematic literature review and 2-reviewer screening process, we identified 10 studies suitable for descriptive analysis and 4 studies suitable for meta-analysis. Among all patients, 69% (24 of 35) achieved a response to CAR T cell therapy, and 52% (18 of 35) achieved a CR. CRS of any grade occurred in 83% (29 of 35), and CRS grade 3 occurred in 9% (3 of 35). Sixty percent of the patients (21 of 35) developed ICANS, and 34% (12 of 35) developed ICANS grade 3.
The incidence of any grade 5 toxicity among all patients was 11% (4 of 35). Fourteen percent of the patients (5 of 35) experienced loss of the transplanted organ. Immunosuppressant therapy was held in 22 patients but eventually restarted in 68% of them (15 of 22). Among the studies included in the meta-analysis, the pooled OR rate was 70% (95% confidence interval [CI], 29. 2% to 100%; I 2 = 71%) and the pooled CR rate was 46% (95% CI, 25. 4% to 67. 8%; I 2 = 29%).
The rates of any grade CRS and grade 3 CRS were 88% (95% CI, 69% to 99%; I 2 = 0%) and 5% (95% CI, 0% to 21%; I 2 = 0%), respectively. The rates of any grade ICANS and ICANS grade 3 were 54% (95% CI, 9% to 96%; I 2 = 68%) and 40% (95% CI, 3% to 85%; I 2 = 63%), respectively. The efficacy of CAR T cell therapy in solid organ transplant recipients is comparable to that in the general population as reported in prior investigational studies, with an acceptable toxicity profile in terms of CRS, ICANS, and transplanted organ compromise.
Further studies are needed to determine long-term effects on organ function, sustained response rates, and best practices peri-CAR T infusion period in this patient population.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。