CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of Outpatient Tisagenlecleucel Recipients for B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of Outpatient Tisagenlecleucel Recipients for B Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
Tisagenlecleucel(tisa-cel)是一种已获批的靶向CD19的CAR-T 细胞疗法,用于复发/难治性B细胞恶性肿瘤。鉴于其可能危及生命的毒性,包括细胞因子释放综合征和免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征,通常考虑住院进行tisa-cel输注和毒性监测;然而,tisa-cel的毒性特征可能有利于门诊给药。本文综述了在门诊环境中接受tisa-cel治疗患者的特征和结局。一项回顾性分析纳入了2018年6月25日至2021年1月22日期间在9个美国学术医学中心接受tisa-cel治疗的18岁及以上B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者。9个代表性中心中有6个(75%)设有门诊项目。共157例患者可评估,其中93例(57%)在门诊治疗组,64例(43%)在住院治疗组。总结了基线特征、毒性和疗效以及资源利用情况。门诊组最常见的淋巴细胞清除(LD)方案为苯达莫司汀(65%),住院组为氟达拉滨/环磷酰胺(91%)。
与住院组相比,门诊组Charlson合并症指数为0的患者更多(51%对15%;P < .001),LD时乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平高于正常范围的患者更少(32%对57%,P = .003),内皮激活和应激指数评分更低(.57对1.4;P < .001)。门诊组任何级别的CRS和ICANS均较低(分别为29%对56% [P < .001]和10%对16% [P = .051])。42例门诊tisa-cel接受者(45%)需要非计划入院,中位住院时间为5天(范围,1至27天),而住院组为13天(范围,4至38天)。两组接受tocilizumab的中位剂量相似,重症监护室(ICU)转入率(5%对8%;P = .5)和中位ICU住院时间(6天对5天;P = .7)也相似。两组在CAR-T 输注后30天内均无毒性相关死亡。两组的无进展生存期和总生存期相似。通过仔细的患者选择,门诊tisa-cel给药是可行的,并且与住院治疗具有相似的疗效结局。门诊毒性监测和管理可能有助于优化医疗资源利用。
Tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) is an approved CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy for relapsed/refractory B cell malignancies. Given potentially life-threatening toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, inpatient tisa-cel infusion and toxicity monitoring are often considered; however, the toxicity profile of tisa-cel may be conducive to outpatient administration.
Here we review the characteristics and outcomes of tisa-cel recipients treated in the outpatient setting. Patients age 18 years with B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma who received tisa-cel between June 25, 2018, and January 22, 2021, at 9 US academic medical centers were included in a retrospective analysis. Six of the 9 representative centers (75%) had an outpatient program in place. A total of 157 patients were evaluable, including 93 (57%) in the outpatient treatment group and 64 (43%) in the inpatient treatment group. Baseline characteristics, toxicity and efficacy, and resource utilization were summarized. The most common lymphodepletion (LD) regimen was bendamustine in the outpatient group (65%) and fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (91%) in the inpatient group. The outpatient group had more patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 0 (51% versus 15%; P < . 001), fewer patients with an elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level above the normal range at the time of LD (32% versus 57%, P = .
003) compared to the inpatient group, and a lower Endothelial Activation and Stress Index score (. 57 versus 1. 4; P < . 001). Any-grade CRS and ICANS were lower in the outpatient group (29% versus 56% [P < . 001] and 10% versus 16% [P = . 051], respectively). Forty-two outpatient tisa-cel recipients (45%) required an unplanned admission, with a median length of stay of 5 days (range, 1 to 27 days), compared to 13 days (range, 4 to 38 days) in the inpatient group. The median number of tocilizumab doses administered was similar in the 2 groups as were the rate of intensive care unit (ICU) transfer (5% versus 8%; P = .
5) and median length of ICU stay (6 days versus 5 days; P = . 7). There were no toxicity-related deaths in the 30 days post-CAR-T infusion in either group. Progression-free survival and overall survival were similar in the 2 groups. With careful patient selection, outpatient tisa-cel administration is feasible and associated with similar efficacy outcomes as inpatient treatment. Outpatient toxicity monitoring and management may help optimize healthcare resource utilization.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。