CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Severe cytopenia after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy: a retrospective study from the EBMT Transplant Complications Working Party.
Severe cytopenia after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy: a retrospective study from the EBMT Transplant Complications Working Party.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
研究调查CAR-T 相关CTCAE 3级血细胞减少的发生率及结局。欧洲血液和骨髓移植协会CAR-T 登记中,纳入2021年8月前接受阿基仑赛(62%)或替沙仑赛(38%)治疗、且记录输注后100天血细胞减少状态的398名成人大B细胞淋巴瘤患者。多数既往接受2至3线治疗,22.3%接受4线及以上;80.4%疾病进展,5%稳定,14.6%部分或完全缓解;25.9%既往移植。中位年龄61.4岁。3级血细胞减少累积发生率在输注后30天为9.0%(95% CI 6.5–12.1),100天为12.1%(95% CI 9.1–15.5);发病中位时间16.5天。严重血细胞减少中15.2%为3级,84.8%为4级,47.6%未缓解。严重血细胞减少不显著影响OS(HR 1.13,p=0.57),但与较差PFS(HR 1.54,p=0.02)和较高复发率(HR 1.52,p=0.03)相关。发病后12个月OS、PFS、复发率和非复发死亡率分别为53.6%、20%、73.5%和6.5%。多变量分析中,CAR-T 治疗年份及治疗前总线数与发生率显著相关;既往移植、输注时疾病状态、年龄和性别均无显著关联。研究揭示欧洲真实世界CAR-T 后严重血细胞减少的频率和临床意义。
We investigated the incidence and outcome of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells-associated Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 3 cytopenia. In the EBMT CAR-T registry, we identified 398 adult patients with large B-cell lymphoma who had been treated with CAR-T-cells with axicel (62%) or tisacel (38%) before August 2021 and had cytopenia status documented for the first 100 days. Most patients had received two or three previous lines of therapy, however, 22. 3% had received four or more. Disease status was progressive in 80. 4%, stable in 5. 0% and partial/complete remission in 14. 6%.
25. 9% of the patients had received a transplantation before. Median age was 61. 4 years (min-max; IQR=18. 7-81; (52. 9-69. 5)). The cumulative incidence of grade 3 cytopenia was 9. 0% at 30 days (95% CI (6. 5 to 12. 1)) and 12. 1% at 100 days after CAR T-cell infusion (95% CI (9. 1 to 15. 5)).
The median time from CAR-T infusion to cytopenia onset was 16. 5 days (min-max; IQR=1-90; (4-29. 8)). Grade 3 and grade 4 CTCAE cytopenia occurred in 15. 2% and 84. 8%, respectively. In 47. 6% there was no resolution. Severe cytopenia had no significant impact on overall survival (OS) (HR 1. 13 (95% CI 0. 74 to 1. 73), p=0. 57).
However, patients with severe cytopenia had a poorer progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 1. 54 (95% CI 1. 07 to 2. 22), p=0. 02) and a higher relapse incidence (HR 1. 52 (95% CI 1. 04 to 2. 23), p=0. 03). In those patients who developed severe cytopenia during the first 100 days (n=47), OS, PFS, relapse incidence and non-relapse mortality at 12 months after diagnosis of severe cytopenia were 53. 6% (95% CI (40. 3 to 71. 2)), 20% (95% CI (10. 4 to 38. 6)), 73. 5% (95% CI (55. 2 to 85. 2)) and 6. 5% (95% CI (1.
7 to 16. 2)), respectively. In multivariate analysis of severe cytopenia risk factors, only year of CAR-T infusion (HR=0. 61, 95% CI (0. 39 to 0. 95), p=0. 028) and total number of treatment lines before CAR-T infusion (one or two lines vs three or more, HR=0. 41, 95% CI (0. 21 to 0. 83), p=0. 013) had a significant positive association with the incidence of cytopenia. Other factors, such as previous transplantation, disease status at time of CAR-T, patient age and patient sex, had no significant association.
Our data provide insight on frequency and clinical relevance of severe cytopenia after CAR T-cell therapy in the European real-world setting.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。