← 返回

宿主特异性差异在高度扩增的 TCR 克隆型中与应答者对比无应答者抗 PD-L1 治疗的不同结果相关

英文原题:Host-specific differences in top-expanded TCR clonotypes correlate with divergent outcomes of anti-PD-L1 treatment in responders versus non-responders.

查看英文原题

Host-specific differences in top-expanded TCR clonotypes correlate with divergent outcomes of anti-PD-L1 treatment in responders versus non-responders.

PubMed 2023/03/27(内容时间) Front Immunol Q1 · IF 7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)彻底改变了癌症治疗;然而,不同个体对 ICI 治疗的反应差异很大,其潜在机制仍知之甚少。在此,我们采用了一种小鼠鳞状细胞癌(SCC)模型,在该模型中,荷瘤受体在接受抗 PD-L1 治疗后分化为应答者(R)与非应答者(NR)。

我们使用 immunoSEQ 平台进行了深入的 TCRβ 测序,以描绘 CD8 TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)的差异。我们发现 R 和 NR CD8 TIL 均表现出克隆扩增的证据,提示无论应答状态如何均存在激活。

我们在 R 与 NR 之间未检测到克隆扩增或克隆多样性指数的差异。然而,前位扩增(>1%)的 TCRβ 克隆型在 R 与 NR CD8 TIL 之间似乎相互排斥,显示在 R 与 NR 中针对同一 SCC 肿瘤,不同 TCRβ 克隆型存在优先扩增。

值得注意的是,R 与 NR 中 TCR 克隆型的相互排斥仅在计数前位 TCRβ 克隆型时观察到,因为此类前位扩增的克隆型在相反结局组中以低得多的频率存在。许多 TCRβ 序列仅在一个受体中以高频率被检测到,提示高度个体化的抗肿瘤免疫应答。

我们得出结论,R 与 NR CD8 TIL 之间前位 TCR 克隆型克隆频率的差异可能是抗 PD-L1 应答差异的因素之一。这一观点可能为不同个体中 ICI 应答的变异性提供新的解释,并可能对个性化癌症免疫治疗新策略的开发产生重大影响。

展开英文摘要原文

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment; however, the responses to ICI treatment are highly variable in different individuals and the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood.

Here, we employed a mouse squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) model where tumor-bearing recipients diverged into responders (R) versus non-responders (NR) upon anti-PD-L1 treatment.

We performed in-depth TCRβ sequencing with immunoSEQ platform to delineate the differences in CD8 tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs).

We found that R and NR CD8 TILs both exhibited evidence of clonal expansion, suggesting activation regardless of response status.

We detected no differences in clonal expansion or clonal diversity indexes between R vs. NR.

However, the top expanded (>1%) TCRβ clonotypes appeared to be mutually exclusive between R and NR CD8 TILs, showing a preferential expansion of distinct TCRβ clonotypes in response to the same SCC tumor in R vs. NR.

Notably, the mutual exclusivity of TCR clonotypes in R vs. NR was only observed when top TCRβ clonotypes were counted, because such top-expanded clonotypes are present in the opposite outcome group at a much lower frequency. Many TCRβ sequences were detected in only one recipient at a high frequency, implicating highly individualized anti-tumor immune responses.

We conclude that differences in the clonal frequency of top TCR clonotypes between R and NR CD8 TILs may be one of the factors underlying differential anti-PD-L1 responses. This notion may offer a novel explanation for variable ICI responses in different individuals, which may substantially impact the development of new strategies for personalized cancer immunotherapy.

论文信息

作者
John J、Chen SMY、Woolaver RA、Ge H、Vashisht M、Huang Z、Chen Z、Wang JH
单位
UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.United States
文献类型
美国 NIH 资助研究 · 非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Frontiers in immunology2023
原文标识
PubMed 37051229 · DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1100520