CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Case report: CAR-T cell therapy-induced cardiac tamponade.
Case report: CAR-T cell therapy-induced cardiac tamponade.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
CD19 CAR-T 近期改善了难治性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的预后,但可引起多种不良事件,尤其是常伴心血管表现的CRS。急性心包积液少于1%,心脏压塞此前仅有一例报告,其管理和结局尚不明确。本文报告一例CAR-T 相关CRS并发心脏压塞,需紧急心包穿刺。65岁难治性DLBCL男性既往有扩张型心肌病但射血分数保留及短暂房颤,第二次复发时肿瘤累及心包。CAR-T 输注次日发生1级CRS,因低血压接受托珠单抗和地塞米松并转入ICU。超声显示急性心包积液及右心衰表现,符合压塞;尽管患者骨髓抑制且4级血小板减少,仍实施心包穿刺。心包液含大量淋巴瘤细胞,淋巴细胞中73%为CAR-T,比例与血液相近。穿刺后血流动力学改善,积液未复发。心包液中活化CAR-T 数量高且症状紧随输注出现,提示CAR-T 扩增可能直接参与机制。患者两天后离开ICU,初期DLBCL应答良好,但治疗开始后50天因再次复发死亡。结论:CAR-T 患者若有DLBCL心包受累并发生CRS,应评估压塞风险。若能妥善控制出血风险,心包穿刺联合抗IL-6治疗和皮质类固醇可作为可行有效处理。
UNLABELLED: CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has recently been shown to improve the prognosis of refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, CAR-T cells may induce numerous adverse events, in particular cytokine release syndrome (CRS) which is frequently associated with cardiovascular manifestations. Among the latter, acute pericardial effusion represents less than 1% of cases and cardiac tamponade has only been reported once. The management and outcome of these severe complications are not well established. We report here, a case of cardiac tamponade associated with CRS in a context of CAR-T cell therapy, which required urgent pericardiocentesis. CASE SUMMARY: A 65-year-old man with refractory DLBCL was treated with CAR-T cell therapy. He had a history of dilated cardiomyopathy with preserved ejection fraction and transient atrial fibrillation. A pericardial localization of the lymphoma was observed on the second relapse. One day after CAR-T cell infusion the patient was diagnosed with grade 1 CRS. Due to hypotension, he was treated with tocilizumab and dexamethasone, and then transferred to intensive care unit (ICU). Echocardiography performed at ICU admission showed acute pericardial effusion with signs of right ventricular heart failure due to cardiac tamponade. It was decided to perform pericardiocentesis despite grade IV thrombocytopenia in a context of aplasia. Analysis of pericardial fluid showed a large number of lymphoma cells and 73% of CAR-T cells amongst lymphocytes, a level that was similar in blood. Hemodynamic status improved after pericardiocentesis, and no recurrence of pericardial effusion was observed. The presence of a high count of activated CAR-T cells in the pericardial fluid as well as the short interval between CAR-T cells injection and the symptoms appear as potential arguments for a direct action of CAR-T cells in the mechanism of this adverse event. The patient was discharged from ICU after two days and initially exhibited a good response to DLBCL treatment. Unfortunately, he died fifty days after starting CAR-T cell therapy due to a new DLBCL relapse. CONCLUSION: Patients with a pericardial localization of DLBCL should be assessed for a risk of cardiac tamponade if receiving CAR-T cell therapy and presenting CRS. In this case, cardiac tamponade seems directly related to CAR-T cell expansion. Pericardiocentesis should be considered as a feasible and effective treatment if the risk of bleeding is well controlled, in association with anti-IL6 and corticosteroids.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。