CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Safety and Efficacy of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Standard of Care in Patients 65 Years of Age or Older with Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
Safety and Efficacy of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel versus Standard of Care in Patients 65 Years of Age or Older with Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
Axi-cel 是一种有效的二线根治性治疗,安全性可控,并改善了 65 岁 R/R LBCL 患者的患者报告结局。
复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)老年患者可能被认为不适合根治性治疗,包括大剂量化疗联合自体干细胞移植(HDT-ASCT)。本文报告ZUMA-7预设的65岁及以上患者亚组分析。
一线免疫化疗无效或12个月内复发的LBCL患者按1:1随机接受阿基仑赛(axi-cel,抗CD19自体CAR-T)或标准治疗(2至3周期免疫化疗后行HDT-ASCT)。主要终点为无事件生存期(EFS),次要终点包括安全性和患者报告结局。
axi-cel组51人,标准治疗组58人。中位随访24.3个月时,中位EFS分别为21.5和2.5个月(HR 0.276,描述性p<0.0001)。客观缓解率为88%比52%,完全缓解率75%比33%。3级不良事件分别发生于94%和82%;未发生5级CRS或神经事件。生活质量分析显示,第100和150天axi-cel组全球健康、躯体功能及EQ-5D-5L评分改善更好。65岁以上与更年轻患者的CAR-T 扩增和基线炎症谱相近。
axi-cel是老年复发/难治性LBCL患者有效的二线根治意图治疗,安全性可管理,并改善患者报告结局。
Older patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) may be considered ineligible for curative-intent therapy including high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT). Here, we report outcomes of a preplanned subgroup analysis of patients 65 years in ZUMA-7.
Patients with LBCL refractory to or relapsed 12 months after first-line chemoimmunotherapy were randomized 1:1 to axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel; autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy] or standard of care (SOC; 2-3 cycles of chemoimmunotherapy followed by HDT-ASCT). The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Secondary endpoints included safety and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
Fifty-one and 58 patients aged 65 years were randomized to axi-cel and SOC, respectively. Median EFS was greater with axi-cel versus SOC (21.5 vs. 2.5 months; median follow-up: 24.3 months; HR, 0.276; descriptive P < 0.0001). Objective response rate was higher with axi-cel versus SOC (88% vs. 52%; OR, 8.81; descriptive P < 0.0001; complete response rate: 75% vs. 33%). Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 94% of axi-cel and 82% of SOC patients. No grade 5 cytokine release syndrome or neurologic events occurred. In the quality-of-life analysis, the mean change in PRO scores from baseline at days 100 and 150 favored axi-cel for EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health, Physical Functioning, and EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale (descriptive P < 0.05). CAR T-cell expansion and baseline serum inflammatory profile were comparable in patients 65 and <65 years.
Axi-cel is an effective second-line curative-intent therapy with a manageable safety profile and improved PROs for patients 65 years with R/R LBCL.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。