← 返回

在 CAR-T 时代,异基因造血细胞移植对复发/难治性侵袭性 B 细胞淋巴瘤的作用

英文原题:Role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas in the CART era.

查看英文原题

Role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas in the CART era.

PubMed 2023/03/14(内容时间) Bone Marrow Transplant Q1 · IF 5.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

抗CD19CAR-T 细胞已迅速被采纳为治疗侵袭性B细胞淋巴瘤(ABCL)二线治疗失败后的标准三线疗法,尽管缺乏与基于异基因造血细胞移植(alloHCT)策略的直接比较。利用西班牙移植与细胞治疗工作组(GETH-TC)登记处,我们筛选了具有以下特征的患者:2016年至2021年间接受CAR-T 或alloHCT;年龄≥18岁;诊断为ABCL;接受过≥2线治疗;在复发时接受抗CD19 CAR-T 或alloHCT作为治疗。分析共纳入316例患者(CAR-T = 215,alloHCT = 101)。CAR-T 队列和alloHCT队列的中位随访时间分别为15个月和36个月。在多变量分析中,CAR-T 在主要研究终点(无进展生存期)方面被证实与alloHCT相似(风险比[HR] 0.92,95% CI:0.56-1.51,p = 0.75)。

此外,当分析仅限于输注时疾病对化疗敏感(完全缓解和部分缓解)的患者时(CAR-T = 26,alloHCT = 93),未报告差异(第+18个月无进展生存率:65% vs 55%,p = 0.59)。

然而,CAR-T 的非复发死亡率更低(HR 0.34,95% CI:0.13-0.85,p = 0.02)。鉴于较低的毒性和相似的生存结局,这些结果提示应在alloHCT之前使用CAR-T。

展开英文摘要原文

Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART) has rapidly been adopted as the standard third-line therapy to treat aggressive B-cell lymphomas (ABCL) after failure of second-line therapy despite the lack of direct comparisons with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT)-based strategies. Using the Grupo Español de Trasplante y Terapia Celular (GETH-TC) registry, we selected patients with the following characteristics: CART or alloHCT performed between 2016 and 2021; ≥18 years old; ABCL diagnosis; ≥2 lines of therapy; and either anti-CD19 CART or alloHCT as therapy at relapse.

The analysis included a total of 316 (CART = 215, alloHCT = 101) patients. Median follow-up was 15 and 36 months for the CART and alloHCT cohorts, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, CART was confirmed to be similar to alloHCT for the primary study endpoint (progression-free survival) (hazard ratio [HR] 0. 92, CI95%:0. 56-1. 51, p = 0. 75).

Furthermore, when the analysis was limited to only patients with chemo-sensitive diseases (complete and partial response) at infusion (CART = 26, alloHCT=93), no differences were reported (progression-free survival at month +18: 65% versus 55%, p = 0. 59).

However, CART had lower non-relapse mortality (HR 0. 34, 95% CI: 0. 13-0. 85, p = 0. 02). Given the lower toxicity and similar survival outcomes, these results suggest the use of CART before alloHCT.

论文信息

作者
Mussetti A、Bento L、Bastos-Oreiro M、Rius-Sansalvador B、Albo C、Bailen R、Barba P、Benzaquén A
单位
Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), L'Hospitalet De Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. amussetti@iconcologia.net.Spain
期刊
Bone marrow transplantation2023 Jun
原文标识
PubMed 36918682 · DOI 10.1038/s41409-023-01949-x