CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas in the CART era.
Role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas in the CART era.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
抗CD19CAR-T 细胞已迅速被采纳为治疗侵袭性B细胞淋巴瘤(ABCL)二线治疗失败后的标准三线疗法,尽管缺乏与基于异基因造血细胞移植(alloHCT)策略的直接比较。利用西班牙移植与细胞治疗工作组(GETH-TC)登记处,我们筛选了具有以下特征的患者:2016年至2021年间接受CAR-T 或alloHCT;年龄≥18岁;诊断为ABCL;接受过≥2线治疗;在复发时接受抗CD19 CAR-T 或alloHCT作为治疗。分析共纳入316例患者(CAR-T = 215,alloHCT = 101)。CAR-T 队列和alloHCT队列的中位随访时间分别为15个月和36个月。在多变量分析中,CAR-T 在主要研究终点(无进展生存期)方面被证实与alloHCT相似(风险比[HR] 0.92,95% CI:0.56-1.51,p = 0.75)。
此外,当分析仅限于输注时疾病对化疗敏感(完全缓解和部分缓解)的患者时(CAR-T = 26,alloHCT = 93),未报告差异(第+18个月无进展生存率:65% vs 55%,p = 0.59)。
然而,CAR-T 的非复发死亡率更低(HR 0.34,95% CI:0.13-0.85,p = 0.02)。鉴于较低的毒性和相似的生存结局,这些结果提示应在alloHCT之前使用CAR-T。
Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CART) has rapidly been adopted as the standard third-line therapy to treat aggressive B-cell lymphomas (ABCL) after failure of second-line therapy despite the lack of direct comparisons with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT)-based strategies. Using the Grupo Español de Trasplante y Terapia Celular (GETH-TC) registry, we selected patients with the following characteristics: CART or alloHCT performed between 2016 and 2021; ≥18 years old; ABCL diagnosis; ≥2 lines of therapy; and either anti-CD19 CART or alloHCT as therapy at relapse.
The analysis included a total of 316 (CART = 215, alloHCT = 101) patients. Median follow-up was 15 and 36 months for the CART and alloHCT cohorts, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, CART was confirmed to be similar to alloHCT for the primary study endpoint (progression-free survival) (hazard ratio [HR] 0. 92, CI95%:0. 56-1. 51, p = 0. 75).
Furthermore, when the analysis was limited to only patients with chemo-sensitive diseases (complete and partial response) at infusion (CART = 26, alloHCT=93), no differences were reported (progression-free survival at month +18: 65% versus 55%, p = 0. 59).
However, CART had lower non-relapse mortality (HR 0. 34, 95% CI: 0. 13-0. 85, p = 0. 02). Given the lower toxicity and similar survival outcomes, these results suggest the use of CART before alloHCT.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。