← 返回

逃逸 DNA 修复的突变细胞为何未更频繁地导致癌症?肿瘤微环境中先天免疫系统的重要性

英文原题:Why Don't the Mutant Cells That Evade DNA Repair Cause Cancer More Frequently? Importance of the Innate Immune System in the Tumor Microenvironment.

查看英文原题

Why Don't the Mutant Cells That Evade DNA Repair Cause Cancer More Frequently? Importance of the Innate Immune System in the Tumor Microenvironment.

PubMed 2023/03/06(内容时间) Int J Mol Sci Q1 · IF 5.6(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

大多数恶性实体瘤的标准治疗仍是切除肿瘤,随后辅以化疗和放疗,以期清除残余癌细胞。这一策略成功延长了许多癌症患者的生命。但对于原发性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM),该策略未能控制复发或延长患者预期寿命。面对这种令人失望的结果,利用肿瘤微环境(TME)细胞设计疗法逐渐受到关注。迄今,此类“免疫疗法”绝大多数采用细胞毒性T(Tc)细胞基因修饰(CAR-T 疗法),或阻断抑制Tc细胞介导癌细胞清除的PD-1或PD-L1蛋白。尽管取得这些进展,GBM对多数患者而言仍是“死亡之吻”。虽然设计癌症疗法时已考虑使用小胶质细胞、巨噬细胞和自然杀伤(NK)细胞等先天免疫细胞,但此类尝试尚未进入临床。

我们此前发表了一系列临床前研究,提出“重新教育”GBM相关小胶质细胞和巨噬细胞(TAM)的策略,使其转变为肿瘤杀伤状态。此类细胞随后分泌趋化因子,募集活化的GBM杀伤性NK细胞,并在GBM同系小鼠模型中挽救50%–60%的小鼠。本综述讨论生物化学家普遍关心的一个基础问题:“既然机体一直会产生突变细胞,为什么我们没有更频繁地患癌?”综述回顾了探讨该问题的文献,并讨论已发表的部分TAM重教育策略,使其重新承担癌症发生前原有的“哨兵”职责。

展开英文摘要原文

The standard of care for most malignant solid tumors still involves tumor resection followed by chemo- and radiation therapy, hoping to eliminate the residual tumor cells. This strategy has been successful in extending the life of many cancer patients. Still, for primary glioblastoma (GBM), it has not controlled recurrence or increased the life expectancies of patients. Amid such disappointment, attempts to design therapies using the cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) have gained ground.

Such "immunotherapies" have so far overwhelmingly used genetic modifications of Tc cells (Car-T cell therapy) or blocking of proteins (PD-1 or PD-L1) that inhibit Tc-cell-mediated cancer cell elimination. Despite such advances, GBM has remained a "Kiss of Death" for most patients. Although the use of innate immune cells, such as the microglia, macrophages, and natural killer (NK) cells, has been considered in designing therapies for cancers, such attempts have not reached the clinic yet.

We have reported a series of preclinical studies highlighting strategies to "re-educate" GBM-associated microglia and macrophages (TAMs) so that they assume a tumoricidal status. Such cells then secrete chemokines to recruit activated, GBM-eliminating NK cells and cause the rescue of 50-60% GBM mice in a syngeneic model of GBM.

This review discusses a more fundamental question that most biochemists harbor: "since we are generating mutant cells in our body all the time, why don't we get cancer more often?" The review visits publications addressing this question and discusses some published strategies for re-educating the TAMs to take on the "sentry" role they initially maintained in the absence of cancer.

论文信息

作者
Mohapatra S、Cafiero J、Kashfi K、Mehta P、Banerjee P
单位
Department of Chemistry, The College of Staten Island, City University of New York, Staten Island, NY 10314, USA.United States
文献类型
综述
期刊
International journal of molecular sciences2023 Mar 6
原文标识
PubMed 36902456 · DOI 10.3390/ijms24055026