← 返回

有效的桥接治疗可改善大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的 CD19 CAR-T 结局并维持安全性

英文原题:Effective bridging therapy can improve CD19 CAR-T outcomes while maintaining safety in patients with large B-cell lymphoma.

查看英文原题

Effective bridging therapy can improve CD19 CAR-T outcomes while maintaining safety in patients with large B-cell lymphoma.

PubMed 2023/06/27(内容时间) Blood Adv Q1 · IF 7.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

桥接治疗(BT)对大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)CD19靶向CAR-T 细胞(CD19 CAR-T)治疗结局的影响尚未充分阐明。目前实践主要依据医师偏好,而非确立证据。确定有效BT方式和疗效预测因素,可能提高CAR-T 意向治疗的完成率并改善临床结局。

本研究分析375名成人LBCL患者接受axicabtagene ciloleucel(Axi-cel)或tisagenlecleucel(Tisa-cel)后的结局,并评估其BT方式和反应。多数患者接受化疗(57%)或放疗(17%)作为BT。研究观察到BT对患者安全,相关发病和死亡极少。对BT达到完全或部分缓解,可使CD19 CAR-T 治疗后疾病进展或死亡风险降低42%。多变量分析确定了若干与BT应答可能性相关的因素,包括对上一线治疗的反应、无大肿块病变以及使用含polatuzumab的化疗方案。数据提示,与Axi-cel相比,BT达到完全或部分缓解对Tisa-cel可能更重要,因为接受Tisa-cel且BT疗效低于部分缓解的所有患者,均在CD19 CAR-T 输注后12个月内明确复发。

总之,LBCL患者的BT应精心规划,以获得最佳反应并降低疾病负荷,改善CD19 CAR-T 相关结局。对所有适合患者均应强烈考虑含polatuzumab的方案;若患者在接受Tisa-cel前BT未达到完全或部分缓解,可在可行时考虑进一步桥接治疗。

展开英文摘要原文

The impact of bridging therapy (BT) on CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CD19CAR-T) outcomes in large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is poorly characterized. Current practice is guided through physician preference rather than established evidence. Identification of effective BT modalities and factors predictive of response could improve both CAR-T intention to treat and clinical outcomes.

We assessed BT modality and response in 375 adult patients with LBCL in relation to outcomes after axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel (Tisa-cel) administration. The majority of patients received BT with chemotherapy (57%) or radiotherapy (17%).

We observed that BT was safe for patients, with minimal morbidity or mortality.

We showed that complete or partial response to BT conferred a 42% reduction in disease progression and death after CD19CAR-T therapy. Multivariate analysis identified several factors associated with likelihood of response to BT, including response to last line therapy, the absence of bulky disease, and the use of polatuzumab-containing chemotherapy regimens.

Our data suggested that complete or partial response to BT may be more important for Tisa-cel than for Axi-cel, because all patients receiving Tisa-cel with less than partial response to BT experienced frank relapse within 12 months of CD19CAR-T infusion.

In summary, BT in LBCL should be carefully planned toward optimal response and disease debulking, to improve patient outcomes associated with CD19CAR-T. Polatuzumab-containing regimens should be strongly considered for all suitable patients, and failure to achieve complete or partial response to BT before Tisa-cel administration may prompt consideration of further lines of BT where possible.

论文信息

作者
Roddie C、Neill L、Osborne W、Iyengar S、Tholouli E、Irvine D、Chaganti S、Besley C
第一作者单位
Department of Haematology, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.United Kingdom
通讯作者单位
Department of Haematology, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.United Kingdom
文献类型
非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Blood advances2023 Jun 27
原文标识
PubMed 36724512 · DOI 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022009019