不适合移植的大 B 细胞淋巴瘤二线使用 axicabtagene ciloleucel:ALYCANTE 最终分析
Second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel in large B-cell lymphoma ineligible for transplantation: ALYCANTE final analysis.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Lisocabtagene maraleucel as second-line therapy for large B-cell lymphoma: primary analysis of the phase 3 TRANSFORM study.
Lisocabtagene maraleucel as second-line therapy for large B-cell lymphoma: primary analysis of the phase 3 TRANSFORM study.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
这项全球3期研究比较了lisocabtagene maraleucel(liso-cel)与标准治疗(SOC)作为原发性难治或早期复发(≤12个月)大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)二线治疗的疗效。符合自体干细胞移植(ASCT)条件的成人(N = 184)按1:1比例随机分配至liso-cel(100 × 106嵌合抗原受体阳性T细胞)或SOC(3个周期铂类免疫化疗,随后对缓解者进行大剂量化疗和ASCT)。主要终点为无事件生存期(EFS)。在这项中位随访17.5个月的主要分析中,liso-cel组的中位EFS未达到(NR),而SOC组为2.4个月。liso-cel组的完全缓解(CR)率为74%,而SOC组为43%(P < .0001),liso-cel组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)为NR,而SOC组为6.2个月(风险比[HR] = 0.400;P < .0001)。
liso-cel组的中位总生存期(OS)为NR,而SOC组为29.9个月(HR = 0.724;P = .0987)。当对SOC交叉至liso-cel进行调整后,18个月OS率在liso-cel组为73%,在SOC组为54%(HR = 0.415)。liso-cel组中3级细胞因子释放综合征和神经系统事件分别发生于1%和4%的患者(无4级或5级事件)。这些数据表明,与SOC相比,liso-cel在EFS、CR率和PFS方面均有显著改善,并支持liso-cel作为原发性难治或早期复发LBCL患者相较于SOC的首选二线治疗。该试验注册于www.ClinicalTrials.gov,编号为#NCT03575351。
This global phase 3 study compared lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) with a standard of care (SOC) as second-line therapy for primary refractory or early relapsed (≤12 months) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Adults eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT; N = 184) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to liso-cel (100 × 106 chimeric antigen receptor-positive T cells) or SOC (3 cycles of platinum-based immunochemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT in responders). The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS). In this primary analysis with a 17. 5-month median follow-up, median EFS was not reached (NR) for liso-cel vs 2. 4 months for SOC. Complete response (CR) rate was 74% for liso-cel vs 43% for SOC (P < .
0001) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was NR for liso-cel vs 6. 2 months for SOC (hazard ratio [HR] = 0. 400; P < . 0001). Median overall survival (OS) was NR for liso-cel vs 29. 9 months for SOC (HR = 0. 724; P = . 0987). When adjusted for crossover from SOC to liso-cel, 18-month OS rates were 73% for liso-cel and 54% for SOC (HR = 0. 415).
Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome and neurological events occurred in 1% and 4% of patients in the liso-cel arm, respectively (no grade 4 or 5 events). These data show significant improvements in EFS, CR rate, and PFS for liso-cel compared with SOC and support liso-cel as a preferred second-line treatment compared with SOC in patients with primary refractory or early relapsed LBCL. This trial was registered at www. clinicaltrials. gov as #NCT03575351.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。