← 返回

Lisocabtagene maraleucel 作为大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的二线治疗:3 期 TRANSFORM 研究的主要分析

英文原题:Lisocabtagene maraleucel as second-line therapy for large B-cell lymphoma: primary analysis of the phase 3 TRANSFORM study.

查看英文原题

Lisocabtagene maraleucel as second-line therapy for large B-cell lymphoma: primary analysis of the phase 3 TRANSFORM study.

PubMed 2023/04/06(内容时间) Blood Q1 · IF 23.9(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

这项全球3期研究比较了lisocabtagene maraleucel(liso-cel)与标准治疗(SOC)作为原发性难治或早期复发(≤12个月)大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)二线治疗的疗效。符合自体干细胞移植(ASCT)条件的成人(N = 184)按1:1比例随机分配至liso-cel(100 × 106嵌合抗原受体阳性T细胞)或SOC(3个周期铂类免疫化疗,随后对缓解者进行大剂量化疗和ASCT)。主要终点为无事件生存期(EFS)。在这项中位随访17.5个月的主要分析中,liso-cel组的中位EFS未达到(NR),而SOC组为2.4个月。liso-cel组的完全缓解(CR)率为74%,而SOC组为43%(P < .0001),liso-cel组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)为NR,而SOC组为6.2个月(风险比[HR] = 0.400;P < .0001)。

liso-cel组的中位总生存期(OS)为NR,而SOC组为29.9个月(HR = 0.724;P = .0987)。当对SOC交叉至liso-cel进行调整后,18个月OS率在liso-cel组为73%,在SOC组为54%(HR = 0.415)。liso-cel组中3级细胞因子释放综合征和神经系统事件分别发生于1%和4%的患者(无4级或5级事件)。这些数据表明,与SOC相比,liso-cel在EFS、CR率和PFS方面均有显著改善,并支持liso-cel作为原发性难治或早期复发LBCL患者相较于SOC的首选二线治疗。该试验注册于www.ClinicalTrials.gov,编号为#NCT03575351。

展开英文摘要原文

This global phase 3 study compared lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) with a standard of care (SOC) as second-line therapy for primary refractory or early relapsed (≤12 months) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Adults eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT; N = 184) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to liso-cel (100 × 106 chimeric antigen receptor-positive T cells) or SOC (3 cycles of platinum-based immunochemotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT in responders). The primary end point was event-free survival (EFS). In this primary analysis with a 17. 5-month median follow-up, median EFS was not reached (NR) for liso-cel vs 2. 4 months for SOC. Complete response (CR) rate was 74% for liso-cel vs 43% for SOC (P < .

0001) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was NR for liso-cel vs 6. 2 months for SOC (hazard ratio [HR] = 0. 400; P < . 0001). Median overall survival (OS) was NR for liso-cel vs 29. 9 months for SOC (HR = 0. 724; P = . 0987). When adjusted for crossover from SOC to liso-cel, 18-month OS rates were 73% for liso-cel and 54% for SOC (HR = 0. 415).

Grade 3 cytokine release syndrome and neurological events occurred in 1% and 4% of patients in the liso-cel arm, respectively (no grade 4 or 5 events). These data show significant improvements in EFS, CR rate, and PFS for liso-cel compared with SOC and support liso-cel as a preferred second-line treatment compared with SOC in patients with primary refractory or early relapsed LBCL. This trial was registered at www. clinicaltrials. gov as #NCT03575351.

论文信息

作者
Abramson JS、Solomon SR、Arnason J、Johnston PB、Glass B、Bachanova V、Ibrahimi S、Mielke S
第一作者单位
Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA.United States
通讯作者单位
Division of Hematology, Hematologic Malignancies and Stem Cell Transplantation, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO.United States
文献类型
随机对照试验 · 非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Blood2023 Apr 6
原文标识
PubMed 36542826 · DOI 10.1182/blood.2022018730