CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Prognostic value of the International Metabolic Prognostic Index for lymphoma patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.
Prognostic value of the International Metabolic Prognostic Index for lymphoma patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
在 CAR-T 的背景下,IMPI 对 PFS 估计具有预后价值。与一线 DLBCL 治疗中的 IMPI 不同,我们未观察到基线时 IMPI 与 CAR-T 后 OS 之间存在显著关联。
CAR-T 细胞疗法(CAR-T)可延长复发/难治性B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的生存期。近期引入的国际代谢预后指数(IMPI)已被证明可改善大B细胞淋巴瘤一线治疗的预后判断。在此,我们探讨IMPI在CD19 CAR-T 治疗背景下对无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的预后价值。
连续接受治疗、具有基线 18 F-FDG PET/CT 成像以及 CAR-T 后 30 天随访成像的患者被纳入。IMPI 由年龄、分期和基线代谢肿瘤体积(MTV)组成,并与国际预后指数(IPI)进行比较。两个指数均按四分位数分组,如先前对 IPI 所述。此外,连续 IMPI 被细分为三分位数,以更好地区分风险组。总缓解率(ORR)、缓解深度(DoR)和 PFS 根据 Lugano 标准确定。比例 Cox 回归分析研究了 IMPI 和 IPI 与 PFS 和 OS 的关联。
共纳入39例患者。IPI为1、2、3、4和5的患者分别占23%、21%、26%、21%和10%。IMPI低危、IMPI中危和IMPI高危患者的30天ORR分别为69%、62%和62%,30天DoR分别为- 67%、- 66%和- 54%,PFS分别为187天、97天和87天。ORR和DoR与较低IMPI无相关性(r = 0.065,p = 0.697)。将患者分为三个风险组显示PFS分层有显著趋势(p = 0.030),而IPI则没有(p = 0.133)。CAR-T 后,IPI和IMPI均与OS无显著关联(均p > 0.05)。
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) prolongs survival for patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The recently introduced International Metabolic Prognostic Index (IMPI) was shown to improve prognostication in the first-line treatment of large B-cell lymphoma. Here, we investigate the prognostic value of the IMPI for progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the setting of CD19 CART.
Consecutively treated patients with baseline 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging and follow-up imaging at 30 days after CART were included. IMPI is composed of age, stage, and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) at baseline and was compared with the International Prognostic Index (IPI). Both indices were grouped into quartiles, as previously described for IPI. In addition, the continuous IMPI was subdivided into tertiaries for better separation of risk groups. Overall response rate (ORR), depth of response (DoR), and PFS were determined based on Lugano criteria. Proportional Cox regression analysis studied association of IMPI and IPI with PFS and OS.
Thirty-nine patients were included. The IPI was 1 in 23%, 2 in 21%, 3 in 26%, 4 in 21%, and 5 in 10% of the patients. IMPI low risk , IMPI intermediate risk , and IMPI high risk patients had 30-day ORR of 69%, 62%, and 62% and 30-day DoR of - 67%, - 66%, and - 54% with a PFS of 187 days, 97 days, and 87 days, respectively. ORR and DoR showed no correlation with lower IMPI (r = 0.065, p = 0.697). Dividing patients into three risk groups showed a significant trend for PFS stratification (p = 0.030), while IPI did not (p = 0.133). Neither IPI nor IMPI yielded a significant association with OS after CART (both p > 0.05).
In the context of CART, the IMPI yielded prognostic value regarding PFS estimation. In contrast with IMPI in the first-line DLBCL setting, we did not observe a significant association of IMPI at baseline with OS after CART.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。