CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Radiation prior to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is an optimizing bridging strategy in relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma.
Radiation prior to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is an optimizing bridging strategy in relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
我们的结果提供并强化了新的见解,即使用放疗作为桥接策略被证明可降低重度 CRS 的发生率并改善患者的 PFS。在亚组分析中,证实放疗可改善大包块疾病患者的 PFS 和 OS。这些发现为提高 CAR-T 细胞治疗的疗效和安全性开辟了新途径。
我们旨在分析在复发/难治性侵袭性B细胞淋巴瘤(r/r ABL)接受CAR-T 细胞治疗前,采用放疗桥接方案联合或不联合化疗与单纯化疗相比的安全性和疗效。
本研究纳入了2017年2月至2020年10月期间接受CAR-T 细胞治疗并桥接方案为单纯化疗(C-CAR-T 组,n = 31)和放疗联合或不联合化疗(R-CAR-T 组,n = 29)的60例患者进行回顾性分析,排除了入组CD19/22 CAR-T 细胞“鸡尾酒”临床试验的105例患者中的45例,包括34例未接受桥接治疗的患者。
R-CAR-T 组未发现显著毒性,两组均无患者发生CAR-T 相关死亡。然而,与C-CAR-T 组相比,R-CAR-T 组3级细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)的发生率更低(0% vs 19.4%,P = 0.036)。C-CAR-T 组和R-CAR-T 组的神经毒性发生率分别为9.9%和6.9%(P = 0.697)。R-CAR-T 组在第30天评估时获得了更高的总缓解率(ORR)(82.8% vs 45.2%,P = 0.0025)。进一步分析结局,R-CAR-T 组较C-CAR-T 组呈现出更好的1年无进展生存期(PFS)率(46.9% vs 22.6%,P = 0.0356)。有趣的是,桥接放疗方案极大改善了 bulky disease 患者的6个月PFS(50.8% vs 16.7%,P = 0.0369)和1年总生存期(OS)率(56.3% vs 33.3%,P = 0.0236)。该研究还发现,进行放疗作为桥接方案是预测更好PFS的独立因素(HR:0.534,95% CI:0.289-0.987,P = 0.045)。
We aimed to analyze the safety and efficacy of a radiation bridging regimen with or without chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone prior to CAR T-cell treatment for relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma (r/r ABL). METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this study, 45 out of 105 patients enrolled in CD19/22 CAR T-cell "cocktail" clinical trial were excluded, including 34 patients without bridging treatment. Total 60 patients receiving CAR T-cell therapies with bridging regimens as chemotherapy alone (C-CAR-T group, n = 31), and radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy (R-CAR-T group, n = 29) between February 2017 and October 2020 were retrospectively analyzed.
No significant toxicities were identified in the R-CAR-T group, and no patients in either group experienced CAR-T-related deaths. However, the R-CAR-T group showed a lower incidence of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) of grade 3 relative to the C-CAR-T group (0% vs 19.4%, P = 0.036). The incidence of neurological toxicity was 9.9% and 6.9% in the C-CAR-T group and R-CAR-T group, respectively (P = 0.697). The R-CAR-T group achieved a higher overall response rate (ORR) at the day 30 assessment (82.8% vs 45.2%, P = 0.0025). Further analyzing the outcomes, the R-CAR-T group presented a better 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate than the C-CAR-T group (46.9% vs 22.6%, P = 0.0356). Intriguingly, the bridging radiation regimen extremely improved the 6-month PFS (50.8% vs 16. 7%, P = 0.0369) and 1-year overall survival (OS) (56.3% vs 33.3%, P = 0.0236) rates in patients with bulky disease. The study also found that conducting radiotherapy as a bridging regimen was an independent factor that predicted better PFS (HR: 0.534, 95% CI: 0.289-0.987, P = 0.045).
Our results provide and strengthen novel insights that the use of radiotherapy as a bridging strategy was demonstrated to reduce the incidence of severe CRS and improve the PFS of patients. In subgroup analysis, it was confirmed that radiotherapy can improve PFS and OS in patients with bulky disease. These findings open new avenues to improve the efficacy and safety of CAR T-cell therapy.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。