← 返回

超声引导下细针穿刺在弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤诊断中的价值:单中心经验

英文原题:The value of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A single center experiment.

查看英文原题

The value of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: A single center experiment.

PubMed 2022/10/19(内容时间) Eur J Radiol Q1 · IF 3.9(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

超声引导下 FNA 取样对提高 FC 标本质量具有重要价值。FNA 可显著提高 R/R DLBCL 中 FC 诊断的敏感性和准确性。

研究思路结论见上方概要

流式细胞术(FC)是指导复发难治性淋巴瘤患者靶向化疗和细胞免疫治疗的关键诊断方法。本研究旨在探讨超声引导下细针穿刺(FNA)在提高复发难治性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(R/R DLBCL)FC标本质量中的价值。

纳入20例标准治疗后R/R DLBCL患者。所有病例的原发灶均经病理学确诊。超声引导下穿刺均采用FNA和CNB,FNA获取的标本直接进行FC检测,CNB获取的标本经研磨后进行FC检测。以组织病理学为金标准,评估两种方法FC检测的准确性。

在20例R/R DLBCL病例中,19例经病理学诊断为DLBCL,1例诊断为炎性肉芽肿。在CNB获得的标本中,经研磨后FC检查的14例显示异常成熟B细胞,5例漏诊,所有病例均未误诊。在FNA获得的标本中,18例显示FC确认的异常成熟B细胞,1例漏诊,所有病例均未误诊。FC联合CNB和FNA的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为73.68 % (14/19) vs 94.73 % (18/19)、100 % (1/1) vs 100 % (1/1)和75 % (15/20) vs 97.14 % (19/20)。FC检测DLBCL的两种穿刺方法的敏感性差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。

展开英文摘要原文

Flow cytometry (FC) is a critical diagnostic approach for guiding targeted chemotherapy and cellular immunotherapy for relapsed and refractory lymphoma patients. The aim of the study was to investigate the value of ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) to improve the quality of FC specimens in relapsed and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL).

Twenty patients with R/R DLBCL after standard treatment were included. The primary lesions of all cases were confirmed by pathology. FNA and core needle biopsy (CNB) were both used for ultrasound-guided puncture, the specimens obtained by FNA are directly examined by FC, and the specimens by CNB were subjected to FC after grinding. The accuracy of FC with the two methods were evaluated using histopathology as the gold standard.

Of the 20 R/R DLBCL cases, 19 were diagnosed as DLBCL pathologically and one was diagnosed as inflammatory granuloma. Among the specimens obtained by CNB, 14 cases examined by FC after grinding showed abnormal mature B cells, five cases were missed, all cases are not misdiagnosed. Among the specimens obtained by FNA, 18 cases showed FC-confirmed abnormal mature B cells, one case was missed, all cases are not misdiagnosed. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FC with CNB and FNA were 73.68 % (14/19) vs 94.73 % (18/19), 100 % (1/1) vs 100 % (1/1), and 75 % (15/20) vs 97.14 % (19/20), respectively. The sensitivity of the two puncture methods of FC of DLBCL was statistically different (p < 0.001).

Sampling with ultrasound-guided FNA is of great value to improve the quality of FC specimens. FNA can significantly improve the sensitivity and accuracy of FC diagnosis in R/R DLBCL.

论文信息

作者
Feng SM、Tan S、Yao XY、Lin YH、Liu HD、Ma LX、Li P、Guo YL
第一作者单位
Center of Lymphoma Therapy, Boren Hospital, 100070 Beijing, China.China
通讯作者单位
Center of Lymphoma Therapy, Boren Hospital, 100070 Beijing, China. Electronic address: aodexiuji@126.com.China
期刊
European journal of radiology2022 Dec
原文标识
PubMed 36283194 · DOI 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110567