← 返回

包括透析的肾功能减退患者接受靶向 CD19 的 CAR-T 细胞治疗的结局

英文原题:Outcomes of CD19-Targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Patients with Reduced Renal Function Including Dialysis.

查看英文原题

Outcomes of CD19-Targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Patients with Reduced Renal Function Including Dialysis.

PubMed 2022/09/26(内容时间) Transplant Cell Ther Q1 · IF 4.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

肾功能损害(RI)患者通常被排除在评估嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法的试验之外。我们评估了接受标准治疗(SOC)CAR-T 细胞疗法治疗复发/难治性(R/R)弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的RI患者的结局。在这项回顾性、单中心队列研究中,纳入接受SOC axicabtagene ciloleucel(axi-cel)或tisagenlecleucel(tisa-cel)治疗、且既往接受过2线或以上治疗的R/R DLBCL患者,根据RI和氟达拉滨减量(DR)状态比较肾脏和生存结局。RI定义为使用第-5天肌酐(Cr)值、按肾脏病饮食改良方程确定的估算肾小球滤过率<60 mL/min/1.73 m 2。急性肾损伤(AKI)依据标准肾脏病:改善全球预后标准进行识别和分级。若至第+30天时Cr在基线0.2 mg/mL以内,则认为发生肾脏恢复。若氟达拉滨给药剂量低于美国食品药品监督管理局推荐标签剂量的90%,则认为发生DR。

在接受CAR-T 细胞治疗的166例患者中,有17例(10.2%)存在基线RI,149例(89.8%)无RI。CAR-T 细胞输注后,基线RI患者与无RI患者之间任何级别AKI的发生率无显著差异(42% vs 21%;P = .08)。同样,严重2/3级AKI见于17例基线RI患者中的1例(5.8%)以及149例无RI患者中的11例(7.3%)(P = 1)。肾脏灌注减少(39例中28例;72%)是AKI最常见的原因,其中细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)导致39例AKI中的17例(44%)。伴RI患者与不伴RI患者之间,以及接受标准剂量氟达拉滨与接受减剂量氟达拉滨的患者之间,PFS和OS均无差异。相比之下,伴AKI患者的临床结局比不伴AKI患者更差(多变量PFS:风险比[HR],2.1;95%置信区间[CI],1.2至3.7;OS:HR,3.9;95%CI,2.1至7.4)。

值得注意的是,发生AKI患者的峰值炎性细胞因子水平更高。最后,我们描述了2例接受透析的终末期肾病(ESRD)患者,他们接受了淋巴细胞清除和CAR-T 细胞治疗。基线肾功能未影响DLBCL患者接受CAR-T 细胞治疗后的肾脏或疗效结局。另一方面,伴AKI患者的临床结局更差。AKI通常与CRS和高峰值炎性细胞因子水平相关。CAR-T 细胞治疗在ESRD患者中是可行的,但需要仔细规划淋巴细胞清除。

展开英文摘要原文

Patients with renal impairment (RI) are typically excluded from trials evaluating chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies.

We evaluated the outcomes of patients with RI receiving standard of care (SOC) CAR T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). In this retrospective, single-center cohort study of patients with R/R DLBCL treated with SOC axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) after 2 or more prior lines of therapy, renal and survival outcomes were compared based on RI and fludarabine dose reduction (DR) status. RI was defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1. 73 m 2 as determined by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation using day -5 creatinine (Cr) values. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was identified and graded using standard Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria. Renal recovery was considered to occur if Cr was within . 2 mg/mL of baseline by day +30. Fludarabine was considered DR if given at <90% of the recommended Food and Drug Administration label dose.

Among 166 patients treated with CAR T cell therapy were 17 patients (10. 2%) with baseline RI and 149 (89. 8%) without RI. After CAR T cell infusion, the incidence of any grade AKI was not significantly different between patients with baseline RI and those without RI (42% versus 21%; P = . 08). Similarly, severe grade 2/3 AKI was seen in 1 of 17 patients (5. 8%) with baseline RI and in 11 of 149 patients (7. 3%) without RI (P = 1).

Decreased renal perfusion (28 of 39; 72%) was the most common cause of AKI, with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) contributing to 17 of 39 AKIs (44%). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) did not differ between patients with RI and those without RI or between those who received standard-dose fludarabine and those who received reduced-dose fludarabine.

In contrast, patients with AKI had worse clinical outcomes than those without AKI (multivariable PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 2. 1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1. 2 to 3. 7; OS: HR, 3. 9; 95% CI, 2. 1 to 7. 4).

Notably, peak inflammatory cytokine levels were higher in patients who experienced AKI.

Finally, we describe 2 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis who received lymphodepletion and CAR T cell therapy. Baseline renal function did not affect renal or efficacy outcomes after CAR T cell therapy in DLBCL. On the other hand, patients with AKI went on to experience worse clinical outcomes. AKI was commonly related to CRS and high peak inflammatory cytokine levels. CAR T cell therapy is feasible in patients with ESRD and requires careful planning of lymphodepletion.

论文信息

作者
Wood AC、Perez AP、Arciola B、Patel K、Johnson G、DiMaggio E、Bachmeier CA、Reid K
第一作者单位
Department of Malignant Hematology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.United States
通讯作者单位
Department of Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida. Electronic address: michael.jain@moffitt.org.United States
文献类型
美国 NIH 资助研究
期刊
Transplantation and cellular therapy2022 Dec
原文标识
PubMed 36174934 · DOI 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.09.009