← 返回

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5:相对于关注病毒变异株,其趋向性演变、强效体液免疫应答逃逸及对临床免疫治疗药物的耐药性

英文原题:SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5: Evolving tropism and evasion of potent humoral responses and resistance to clinical immunotherapeutics relative to viral variants of concern.

查看英文原题

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.5: Evolving tropism and evasion of potent humoral responses and resistance to clinical immunotherapeutics relative to viral variants of concern.

PubMed 2022/09/18(内容时间) EBioMedicine Q1 · IF 11.2(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

观察结果支持所有 Omicron 变异株在多种疫苗接种和/或康复者应答中显著逃逸中和抗体。治疗性单克隆抗体的效力也降低,且在不同 Omicron 谱系间存在差异。BA.5 与其他 Omicron 亚变异株的关键差异在于其嗜性回复为使用前 Omicron 谱系高效利用的已知 ACE2-TMPRSS2 通路。监测这些变化是否影响传播和/或疾病严重程度,将是全球持续追踪和管理 Omicron 疫情波的关键。

研究思路结论见上方概要

自2020年1月以来,已记录了严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)基因上不同的病毒变异株。全球疫苗规划的引入有助于降低COVID-19住院率和死亡率,尤其是在发达国家。2021年末,Omicron BA.1出现,与其他关注变异株相比,其遗传差异和临床效应发生了显著改变。在2022年初主导全球传播后不久,BA.1被基因上不同的Omicron谱系BA.2取代。BA.2的一个亚谱系,命名为BA.5,目前相对于BA.2和其他BA.2亚谱系具有生长优势。在此,我们使用活病毒中和试验,研究了一系列疫苗血清和恢复期血清以及治疗性单克隆抗体对Omicron BA.1、BA.2和BA.5以及前Omicron变异株的中和作用。使用原代鼻咽拭子,我们还测试了BA.5与前Omicron和Omicron病毒谱系相比,在利用ACE2-TMPRSS2通路能力方面的相对适应性。

使用A.2.2分支、Beta、Delta、BA.1、BA.2和BA.5的低传代临床分离株,我们在接种疫苗和恢复期队列中,使用从数千名血浆捐献者中汇集浓缩的人IgG以及获批的单克隆抗体疗法,测定了体外体液中和作用。随后,我们测定了原代鼻咽样本中的感染性与颗粒比率,并在存在和不存在TMPRSS2抑制剂Nafamostat的情况下,在基因工程改造的ACE2/TMPRSS2细胞系中扩增低传代分离株。

对3剂BNT162b2疫苗的峰值应答与Omicron谱系BA.1、BA.2和BA.5的中和下降9倍相关。来自恢复期和疫苗接种供者的浓缩混合人IgG以及伴有BA.1突破感染的BNT162b2疫苗接种与更广泛的中和广度相关,尽管在所有Omicron谱系中效力仍下降7倍。对临床级抗体进行检测显示,针对BA.5,使用Evusheld下降14.3倍,使用Sotrovimab下降16.8倍。虽然BA.1和BA.2在ACE2/TMPRSS2进入途径中的感染性减弱,但观察到BA.5与2020年初流行的clade相当,并且对TMPRSS2抑制剂Nafamostat更敏感。

展开英文摘要原文

Genetically distinct viral variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been recorded since January 2020. The introduction of global vaccine programs has contributed to lower COVID-19 hospitalisation and mortality rates, particularly in developed countries. In late 2021, Omicron BA.1 emerged, with substantially altered genetic differences and clinical effects from other variants of concern. Shortly after dominating global spread in early 2022, BA.1 was supplanted by the genetically distinct Omicron lineage BA.2. A sub-lineage of BA.2, designated BA.5, presently has an outgrowth advantage over BA.2 and other BA.2 sub-lineages. Here we study the neutralisation of Omicron BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5 and pre-Omicron variants using a range of vaccine and convalescent sera and therapeutic monoclonal antibodies using a live virus neutralisation assay. Using primary nasopharyngeal swabs, we also tested the relative fitness of BA.5 compared to pre-Omicron and Omicron viral lineages in their ability to use the ACE2-TMPRSS2 pathway.

Using low passage clinical isolates of Clade A.2.2, Beta, Delta, BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5, we determined humoral neutralisation in vitro in vaccinated and convalescent cohorts, using concentrated human IgG pooled from thousands of plasma donors, and licensed monoclonal antibody therapies. We then determined infectivity to particle ratios in primary nasopharyngeal samples and expanded low passage isolates in a genetically engineered ACE2/TMPRSS2 cell line in the presence and absence of the TMPRSS2 inhibitor Nafamostat.

Peak responses to 3 doses of BNT162b2 vaccine were associated with a 9-fold reduction in neutralisation for Omicron lineages BA.1, BA.2 and BA.5. Concentrated pooled human IgG from convalescent and vaccinated donors and BNT162b2 vaccination with BA.1 breakthrough infections were associated with greater breadth of neutralisation, although the potency was still reduced 7-fold across all Omicron lineages. Testing of clinical grade antibodies revealed a 14.3-fold reduction using Evusheld and 16.8-fold reduction using Sotrovimab for the BA.5. Whilst the infectivity of BA.1 and BA.2 was attenuated in ACE2/TMPRSS2 entry, BA.5 was observed to be equivalent to that of an early 2020 circulating clade and had greater sensitivity to the TMPRSS2 inhibitor Nafamostat. INTERPRETATION: Observations support all Omicron variants to significantly escape neutralising antibodies across a range of vaccination and/or convalescent responses. Potency of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies is also reduced and differs across Omicron lineages. The key difference of BA.5 from other Omicron sub-variants is the reversion in tropism back to using the well-known ACE2-TMPRSS2 pathway, utilised efficiently by pre-Omicron lineages. Monitoring if these changes influence transmission and/or disease severity will be key for ongoing tracking and management of Omicron waves globally. FUNDING: This work was primarily supported by Australian Medical Foundation research grants MRF2005760 (ST, GM & WDR), MRF2001684 (ADK and ST) and Medical Research Future Fund Antiviral Development Call grant (WDR), Medical Research Future Fund COVID-19 grant (MRFF2001684, ADK & SGT) and the New South Wales Health COVID-19 Research Grants Round 2 (SGT).

论文信息

作者
Aggarwal A、Akerman A、Milogiannakis V、Silva MR、Walker G、Stella AO、Kindinger A、Angelovich T
第一作者单位
The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia.Australia
通讯作者单位
The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, New South Wales, Australia. Electronic address: sturville@kirby.unsw.edu.au.Australia
期刊
EBioMedicine2022 Oct
原文标识
PubMed 36130476 · DOI 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104270