CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Efficacy comparison of tisagenlecleucel vs usual care in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma.
Efficacy comparison of tisagenlecleucel vs usual care in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
ELARA 试验表明,tisagenlecleucel(tisa-cel)是一种有效的抗 CD19 CAR-T 细胞疗法,用于治疗复发/难治性滤泡性淋巴瘤(r/r FL)。由于 ELARA 是单臂试验,本研究将 ELARA 试验中 tisa-cel 的结局与真实世界队列的常规治疗进行比较。截至 2021 年 3 月 29 日,ELARA 入组了 98 例患者(中位随访时间:自入组起 15 个月)。常规治疗数据来自 ReCORD-FL,这是一项针对 r/r FL 患者的全球回顾性研究,这些患者符合与 ELARA 相似的入组标准。数据截止日期为 2020 年 12 月 31 日,ReCORD-FL 研究纳入了 187 例既往接受过 ≥2 线治疗的患者(中位随访时间:自三线治疗起 57 个月)。对来自 ELARA 试验的 97 例患者和来自 ReCORD-FL 研究的 143 例基线因素数据无缺失的患者进行了间接治疗比较。
通过倾向性评分模型在队列之间选择或匹配评估结局的治疗线。经优势加权进行基线因素调整后,tisa-cel 的完全缓解率(CRR;95% 置信区间)为 69.1%(59.8%-78.3%),而常规治疗为 37.3%(26.4%-48.3%);总缓解率分别为 85.6%(78.7%-92.5%)vs. 63.6%(52.5%-74.7%)。tisa-cel 在 12 个月时无进展/无事件的 Kaplan-Meier 概率为 70.5%(61.4%-79.7%),而常规治疗为 51.9%(40.6%-63.3%),风险比(HR)=0.60(0.34-0.86);12 个月总生存率分别为 96.6%(92.9%-100%)vs. 71.7%(61.2%-82.2%),HR=0.2(0.02-0.38)。
总之,与常规治疗相比,tisa-cel 与完全缓解率提高 1.9 倍、12 个月无进展或无事生存率提高 1.4 倍相关,并且死亡风险降低 80%。这些发现为 tisa-cel 在既往接受过 ≥2 线治疗的 r/r FL 患者中的获益提供了额外证据。该试验注册于 www.ClinicalTrials.gov,注册号为 NCT03568461。
The ELARA trial indicates tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) is an effective anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (r/r FL). As ELARA is a single-arm trial, this study compares tisa-cel outcomes from the ELARA trial with usual care from a real-world cohort. ELARA enrolled 98 patients as of 29 March 2021 (median follow-up: 15 months from enrollment). Usual care data were obtained from ReCORD-FL, a global retrospective study of patients with r/r FL, who met similar eligibility criteria to ELARA. With a data cutoff date of 31 December 2020, 187 patients with ≥2 preceding treatment lines were included in the ReCORD-FL (median follow-up: 57 months from third-line) study.
An indirect treatment comparison was performed for 97 patients from the ELARA trial and 143 patients from the ReCORD-FL study with no missing data on baseline factors. The line of therapy for which outcomes were assessed was selected or matched between cohorts using propensity score modeling. After baseline factor adjustment via weighting by odds, complete response rate (CRR; 95% confidence interval) was 69. 1% (59. 8%-78.
3%) for tisa-cel vs. 37. 3% (26. 4%-48. 3%) for usual care; overall response rate was 85. 6% (78. 7%-92. 5%) vs. 63. 6% (52. 5%-74. 7%). Kaplan-Meier probability of being progression/event-free at 12 months was 70. 5% (61. 4%-79. 7%) for tisa-cel vs. 51. 9% (40. 6%-63. 3%) for usual care, with hazard ratio (HR)=0. 60 (0. 34-0. 86); 12-month overall survival was 96. 6% (92. 9%-100%) vs. 71. 7% (61. 2%-82. 2%), with HR=0. 2 (0. 02-0. 38).
In conclusion, tisa-cel was associated with a 1. 9-fold higher complete response rate and a 1. 4-fold higher rate of being progression or event free at 12 months vs usual care, as well as a death risk reduction of 80%. The findings provide additional evidence on the benefit of tisa-cel in patients with r/r FL after ≥2 treatment lines. This trial was registered at www. clinicaltrials. gov as NCT03568461.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。