← 返回

美国大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者中 axicabtagene ciloleucel 作为二线治疗的成本效果:ZUMA-7 试验的经济学评价

英文原题:The Cost-Effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel as Second-Line Therapy in Patients with Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the United States: An Economic Evaluation of the ZUMA-7 Trial.

查看英文原题

The Cost-Effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel as Second-Line Therapy in Patients with Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the United States: An Economic Evaluation of the ZUMA-7 Trial.

PubMed 2022/08/12(内容时间) Transplant Cell Ther Q1 · IF 4.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

关键性ZUMA-7试验显示,对于二线大B细胞淋巴瘤(2L LBCL),阿基仑赛(axi-cel)的临床结局优于标准治疗(SOC;挽救性化学免疫治疗,应答者随后接受大剂量治疗和自体干细胞回输)。本分析旨在评估axi-cel相较当前2L LBCL标准治疗的成本效果。研究从美国支付方角度建立三状态分区生存模型,估算成本效果和预算影响;临床结局依据关键试验外推。模型计算预期质量调整生命年(QALY)、总成本(美元)、增量成本效果比(ICER)及预算影响,并开展敏感性和情景分析。估计10年时axi-cel组和SOC组存活比例分别为48%和38%;两组预估总生存期中位数分别为59个月和24个月。终生时间范围内,SOC和axi-cel组估计获得5.56和7.08个QALY,其中处于无事件状态的比例分别为41%和74%。axi-cel相较SOC的增量QALY和成本分别为1.51和100,366美元,对应ICER为每QALY 66,381美元。尽管SOC组有患者后续交叉接受CAR-T 治疗,二线CAR-T 仍可改善生活质量和生存时间;后续CAR-T 产生的成本抵消使增量成本差异有限。对于一线治疗后复发或耐药、存在重要未满足需求的LBCL患者,axi-cel是一种具有成本效果的治疗选择。

展开英文摘要原文

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) was found to have superior clinical outcomes compared to standard of care (SOC; salvage chemoimmunotherapy, followed by high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell rescue for responders) for second-line large B-cell lymphoma (2L LBCL) in the pivotal ZUMA-7 trial. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of using axi-cel compared to the current standard 2L LBCL therapy. A 3-state partitioned-survival model estimated the cost effectiveness and budget impact from a payer perspective in the United States. Clinical outcomes were extrapolated based on the pivotal trial. The model calculated expected quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total costs (in United States dollars [USD], and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), along with the budget impact. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed.

The proportion alive at 10 years was estimated as 48% for axi-cel and 38% for SOC; median overall survival was estimated at 59 and 24 months for axi-cel and SOC, respectively. Over a lifetime horizon, the model estimated a total of 5. 56 and 7. 08 QALYs for SOC and axi-cel, respectively, of which 41% and 74% were in the event-free state, respectively. Incremental QALYs and costs were 1. 51 and $100,366 USD, resulting in an ICER of $66,381 USD per QALY for axi-cel versus SOC.

Despite crossover to subsequent CAR T in the SOC arm, second-line CAR T use was found to improve the quality and length of life compared to SOC. Cost offsets due to subsequent CAR T use led to a limited incremental cost difference. Treatment with axi-cel is a cost-effective option that addresses an important unmet clinical need for patients with LBCL who relapse or are refractory to front-line therapy.

论文信息

作者
Perales MA、Kuruvilla J、Snider JT、Vadgama S、Blissett R、El-Moustaid F、Smith NJ、Patel AR
单位
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: peralesm@MSKCC.org.United States
文献类型
美国 NIH 资助研究 · 非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Transplantation and cellular therapy2022 Nov
原文标识
PubMed 35970302 · DOI 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.08.010