CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:The Cost-Effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel as Second-Line Therapy in Patients with Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the United States: An Economic Evaluation of the ZUMA-7 Trial.
The Cost-Effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel as Second-Line Therapy in Patients with Large B-Cell Lymphoma in the United States: An Economic Evaluation of the ZUMA-7 Trial.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
关键性ZUMA-7试验显示,对于二线大B细胞淋巴瘤(2L LBCL),阿基仑赛(axi-cel)的临床结局优于标准治疗(SOC;挽救性化学免疫治疗,应答者随后接受大剂量治疗和自体干细胞回输)。本分析旨在评估axi-cel相较当前2L LBCL标准治疗的成本效果。研究从美国支付方角度建立三状态分区生存模型,估算成本效果和预算影响;临床结局依据关键试验外推。模型计算预期质量调整生命年(QALY)、总成本(美元)、增量成本效果比(ICER)及预算影响,并开展敏感性和情景分析。估计10年时axi-cel组和SOC组存活比例分别为48%和38%;两组预估总生存期中位数分别为59个月和24个月。终生时间范围内,SOC和axi-cel组估计获得5.56和7.08个QALY,其中处于无事件状态的比例分别为41%和74%。axi-cel相较SOC的增量QALY和成本分别为1.51和100,366美元,对应ICER为每QALY 66,381美元。尽管SOC组有患者后续交叉接受CAR-T 治疗,二线CAR-T 仍可改善生活质量和生存时间;后续CAR-T 产生的成本抵消使增量成本差异有限。对于一线治疗后复发或耐药、存在重要未满足需求的LBCL患者,axi-cel是一种具有成本效果的治疗选择。
Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) was found to have superior clinical outcomes compared to standard of care (SOC; salvage chemoimmunotherapy, followed by high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell rescue for responders) for second-line large B-cell lymphoma (2L LBCL) in the pivotal ZUMA-7 trial. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of using axi-cel compared to the current standard 2L LBCL therapy. A 3-state partitioned-survival model estimated the cost effectiveness and budget impact from a payer perspective in the United States. Clinical outcomes were extrapolated based on the pivotal trial. The model calculated expected quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total costs (in United States dollars [USD], and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), along with the budget impact. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed.
The proportion alive at 10 years was estimated as 48% for axi-cel and 38% for SOC; median overall survival was estimated at 59 and 24 months for axi-cel and SOC, respectively. Over a lifetime horizon, the model estimated a total of 5. 56 and 7. 08 QALYs for SOC and axi-cel, respectively, of which 41% and 74% were in the event-free state, respectively. Incremental QALYs and costs were 1. 51 and $100,366 USD, resulting in an ICER of $66,381 USD per QALY for axi-cel versus SOC.
Despite crossover to subsequent CAR T in the SOC arm, second-line CAR T use was found to improve the quality and length of life compared to SOC. Cost offsets due to subsequent CAR T use led to a limited incremental cost difference. Treatment with axi-cel is a cost-effective option that addresses an important unmet clinical need for patients with LBCL who relapse or are refractory to front-line therapy.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。