← 返回

Axicabtagene Ciloleucel 与最佳支持治疗在加拿大用于治疗两线或以上系统性治疗后复发/难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)成人患者的成本效果

英文原题:The Cost Effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Versus Best Supportive Care in the Treatment of Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL) After Two or More Lines of Systemic Therapy in Canada.

查看英文原题

The Cost Effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Versus Best Supportive Care in the Treatment of Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL) After Two or More Lines of Systemic Therapy in Canada.

PubMed 2022/07/18(内容时间) Pharmacoeconomics Q1 · IF 4.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

该分析结果表明,在加拿大,与最佳支持治疗相比,axi-cel 用于治疗复发/难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤成人患者可能被视为一种具有成本效益的资源分配方案。

研究思路结论见上方概要

Axicabtagene ciloleucel(axi-cel)已在加拿大获得上市许可,用于治疗接受过两线或以上系统性治疗后的复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤,因此需要评估axi-cel对患者和医疗保健系统的临床和经济价值。本分析的目标是从社会和公共医疗支付方的角度,确定在加拿大复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者中,axi-cel与最佳支持治疗相比的成本效果。

开发了一个药物经济学模型,并使用来自ZUMA-1和SCHOLAR-1研究的临床数据,通过倾向评分匹配比较进行填充。采用分区生存混合治愈建模方法来表征axi-cel治疗大B细胞淋巴瘤的潜在治愈效果。医疗资源利用和不良事件数据基于ZUMA-1的结果,效用值来源于ZUMA-1数据并辅以已发表文献。成本(以2021年加拿大元计)取自公开可用的加拿大成本数据库和已发表文献。收益和成本按每年1.5%折现,并进行了敏感性分析以评估结果的稳健性。

在基础案例中,与最佳支持治疗相比,axi-cel产生了6.2个增量生命年,相当于额外4.6个质量调整生命年,并伴有606,010美元的额外成本。从社会视角来看,与最佳支持治疗相比,增量成本效用比为每获得一个质量调整生命年132,747美元(从公共医疗支付者视角为每获得一个质量调整生命年106,392美元)。分析的关键驱动因素包括axi-cel的无进展生存期和总生存期值。

展开英文摘要原文

Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) received marketing authorisation in Canada for the treatment of relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy, and the clinical and economic value of axi-cel to patients and the healthcare system should be examined. The objective of this analysis is to determine, from societal and public healthcare payer perspectives, the cost effectiveness of axi-cel versus best supportive care for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in Canada.

A pharmacoeconomic model was developed and populated with clinical data derived from the ZUMA-1 and SCHOLAR-1 studies using a propensity score-matched comparison. A partitioned survival mixture-cure modelling approach was taken to characterise the potential curative effect of axi-cel therapy in large B-cell lymphoma. Healthcare resource utilisation and adverse event data were based on results from ZUMA-1, and utility values were derived from ZUMA-1 data supplemented with published literature. Costs (in 2021 Canadian dollars) were taken from publicly available Canadian cost databases and published literature. Benefits and costs were discounted at 1.5% per year, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results.

In the base case, axi-cel generated an incremental 6.2 life-years compared to best supportive care, corresponding to 4.6 additional quality-adjusted life-years, and was associated with $606,010 in additional costs. The incremental cost-utility ratio was $132,747 per quality-adjusted life-year gained compared with best supportive care from a societal perspective ($106,392 per quality-adjusted life-year gained from a public healthcare payer perspective). Key drivers of the analysis included progression-free survival and overall survival values for axi-cel.

The results of this analysis suggest that axi-cel may be considered a cost-effective allocation of resources compared with best supportive care for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in Canada.

论文信息

作者
Hillis C、Vicente C、Ball G
单位
McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. hillisc@mcmaster.ca.Canada
文献类型
非美国政府资助研究
期刊
PharmacoEconomics2022 Sep
原文标识
PubMed 35844002 · DOI 10.1007/s40273-022-01169-z