← 返回

ZUMA-7 中患者报告结局,一项关于 axicabtagene ciloleucel 用于二线大 B 细胞淋巴瘤的 3 期研究

英文原题:Patient-reported outcomes in ZUMA-7, a phase 3 study of axicabtagene ciloleucel in second-line large B-cell lymphoma.

查看英文原题

Patient-reported outcomes in ZUMA-7, a phase 3 study of axicabtagene ciloleucel in second-line large B-cell lymphoma.

PubMed 2022/11/24(内容时间) Blood Q1 · IF 23.9(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

在此,我们报告了来自关键性随机3期ZUMA-7研究(比较axicabtagene ciloleucel(axi-cel)与SOC)的首个比较分析,评估了在二线复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤(R/R LBCL)中,CAR-T 细胞治疗与标准治疗(SOC)的患者报告结局(PROs)。PRO工具在基线、第50天、第100天、第150天、第9个月以及从随机化起每3个月给药一次,直至24个月或发生无事件生存期事件。生活质量(QoL)分析集包括具有基线和≥1次随访PRO完成的患者。对生活质量问卷-核心30(QLQ-C30)躯体功能、总体健康状况/QoL和EQ-5D-5L视觉模拟量表(VAS)的预设假设,使用重复测量混合效应模型进行检验。临床意义变化定义为QLQ-C30为10分,EQ-5D-5L VAS为7分。在359例患者中,296例(165例axi-cel,131例SOC)符合QoL分析的纳入标准。

在第100天,观察到有利于axi-cel而非SOC的统计学显著且具有临床意义的评分较基线平均变化差异,涉及QLQ-C30总体健康状况/QoL(估计差异18.1 [95%置信区间(CI),12.3-23.9])、躯体功能(13.1 [95% CI,8.0-18.2])和EQ-5D-5L VAS(13.7 [95% CI,8.5-18.8];所有P < .0001)。在第150天,评分显著有利于axi-cel而非SOC,涉及总体健康状况/QoL(9.8 [95% CI,2.6-17.0];P = .0124)和EQ-5D-5L VAS(11.3 [95% CI,5.4-17.1];P = .0004)。Axi-cel在QoL方面显示出优于SOC的具有临床意义的改善。Axi-cel更优的临床结局和良好的患者体验应有助于为二线R/R LBCL的治疗选择提供信息。该试验已在www. ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号为#NCT03391466。

展开英文摘要原文

Here, we report the first comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy vs standard-of-care (SOC) therapy in second-line relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (R/R LBCL) from the pivotal randomized phase 3 ZUMA-7 study of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) vs SOC. PRO instruments were administered at baseline, day 50, day 100, day 150, month 9, and every 3 months from randomization until 24 months or an event-free survival event. The quality of life (QoL) analysis set comprised patients with a baseline and ≥1 follow-up PRO completion. Prespecified hypotheses for Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) physical functioning, global health status/QoL, and EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale (VAS) were tested using mixed-effects models with repeated measures. Clinically meaningful changes were defined as 10 points for QLQ-C30 and 7 for EQ-5D-5L VAS.

Among 359 patients, 296 (165 axi-cel, 131 SOC) met inclusion criteria for QoL analysis. At day 100, statistically significant and clinically meaningful differences in mean change of scores from baseline were observed favoring axi-cel over SOC for QLQ-C30 global health status/QoL (estimated difference 18. 1 [95% confidence interval (CI), 12. 3-23. 9]), physical functioning (13. 1 [95% CI, 8. 0-18. 2]), and EQ-5D-5L VAS (13. 7 [95% CI, 8. 5-18. 8]; P < .

0001 for all). At day 150, scores significantly favored axi-cel vs SOC for global health status/QoL (9. 8 [95% CI, 2. 6-17. 0]; P = . 0124) and EQ-5D-5L VAS (11. 3 [95% CI, 5. 4-17. 1]; P = . 0004). Axi-cel showed clinically meaningful improvements in QoL over SOC. Superior clinical outcomes and favorable patient experience with axi-cel should help inform treatment choices in second-line R/R LBCL. This trial was registered at www. clinicaltrials. gov as #NCT03391466.

论文信息

作者
Elsawy M、Chavez JC、Avivi I、Larouche JF、Wannesson L、Cwynarski K、Osman K、Davison K
第一作者单位
Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.Canada
通讯作者单位
Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC on behalf of Stichting Hemato-Oncologie voor Volwassenen Nederland (HOVON)/ Lunenburg Lymphoma Phase 1 / II Consortium (LLPC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.Netherlands
文献类型
III 期临床试验 · 非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Blood2022 Nov 24
原文标识
PubMed 35839452 · DOI 10.1182/blood.2022015478