CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Patient-reported outcomes in ZUMA-7, a phase 3 study of axicabtagene ciloleucel in second-line large B-cell lymphoma.
Patient-reported outcomes in ZUMA-7, a phase 3 study of axicabtagene ciloleucel in second-line large B-cell lymphoma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
在此,我们报告了来自关键性随机3期ZUMA-7研究(比较axicabtagene ciloleucel(axi-cel)与SOC)的首个比较分析,评估了在二线复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤(R/R LBCL)中,CAR-T 细胞治疗与标准治疗(SOC)的患者报告结局(PROs)。PRO工具在基线、第50天、第100天、第150天、第9个月以及从随机化起每3个月给药一次,直至24个月或发生无事件生存期事件。生活质量(QoL)分析集包括具有基线和≥1次随访PRO完成的患者。对生活质量问卷-核心30(QLQ-C30)躯体功能、总体健康状况/QoL和EQ-5D-5L视觉模拟量表(VAS)的预设假设,使用重复测量混合效应模型进行检验。临床意义变化定义为QLQ-C30为10分,EQ-5D-5L VAS为7分。在359例患者中,296例(165例axi-cel,131例SOC)符合QoL分析的纳入标准。
在第100天,观察到有利于axi-cel而非SOC的统计学显著且具有临床意义的评分较基线平均变化差异,涉及QLQ-C30总体健康状况/QoL(估计差异18.1 [95%置信区间(CI),12.3-23.9])、躯体功能(13.1 [95% CI,8.0-18.2])和EQ-5D-5L VAS(13.7 [95% CI,8.5-18.8];所有P < .0001)。在第150天,评分显著有利于axi-cel而非SOC,涉及总体健康状况/QoL(9.8 [95% CI,2.6-17.0];P = .0124)和EQ-5D-5L VAS(11.3 [95% CI,5.4-17.1];P = .0004)。Axi-cel在QoL方面显示出优于SOC的具有临床意义的改善。Axi-cel更优的临床结局和良好的患者体验应有助于为二线R/R LBCL的治疗选择提供信息。该试验已在www. ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号为#NCT03391466。
Here, we report the first comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy vs standard-of-care (SOC) therapy in second-line relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (R/R LBCL) from the pivotal randomized phase 3 ZUMA-7 study of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) vs SOC. PRO instruments were administered at baseline, day 50, day 100, day 150, month 9, and every 3 months from randomization until 24 months or an event-free survival event. The quality of life (QoL) analysis set comprised patients with a baseline and ≥1 follow-up PRO completion. Prespecified hypotheses for Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) physical functioning, global health status/QoL, and EQ-5D-5L visual analog scale (VAS) were tested using mixed-effects models with repeated measures. Clinically meaningful changes were defined as 10 points for QLQ-C30 and 7 for EQ-5D-5L VAS.
Among 359 patients, 296 (165 axi-cel, 131 SOC) met inclusion criteria for QoL analysis. At day 100, statistically significant and clinically meaningful differences in mean change of scores from baseline were observed favoring axi-cel over SOC for QLQ-C30 global health status/QoL (estimated difference 18. 1 [95% confidence interval (CI), 12. 3-23. 9]), physical functioning (13. 1 [95% CI, 8. 0-18. 2]), and EQ-5D-5L VAS (13. 7 [95% CI, 8. 5-18. 8]; P < .
0001 for all). At day 150, scores significantly favored axi-cel vs SOC for global health status/QoL (9. 8 [95% CI, 2. 6-17. 0]; P = . 0124) and EQ-5D-5L VAS (11. 3 [95% CI, 5. 4-17. 1]; P = . 0004). Axi-cel showed clinically meaningful improvements in QoL over SOC. Superior clinical outcomes and favorable patient experience with axi-cel should help inform treatment choices in second-line R/R LBCL. This trial was registered at www. clinicaltrials. gov as #NCT03391466.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。