CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Bendamustine is safe and effective for lymphodepletion before tisagenlecleucel in patients with refractory or relapsed large B-cell lymphomas.
Bendamustine is safe and effective for lymphodepletion before tisagenlecleucel in patients with refractory or relapsed large B-cell lymphomas.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
苯达莫司汀用于 tisagenlecleucel 前的淋巴细胞清除,其疗效与氟达拉滨/环磷酰胺相似,但毒性更低,包括细胞因子释放综合征、神经毒性、感染性和血液学毒性,以及住院利用率降低。
抗CD19CAR-T 细胞免疫疗法(CAR-T)现已成为复发/难治性B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤的标准治疗;然而,相当一部分患者对CAR-T 无应答和/或发生毒性。淋巴细胞清除化疗是CAR-T 治疗的重要组成部分,可增强CAR-T 细胞植入、扩增、细胞毒性和持续存在能力。我们假设淋巴细胞清除方案可能影响CAR-T 安全性和疗效。
比较两种tisagenlecleucel输注前淋巴细胞清除方案的安全性和疗效:氟达拉滨/环磷酰胺(n=42)或苯达莫司汀(n=90)。患者为复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者,连续在美国3家学术医疗机构(宾夕法尼亚大学n=90;俄勒冈健康与科学大学n=35)及欧洲维也纳大学(n=7)接受治疗。依据2014年Lugano标准评估应答;依据不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)5.0版,并在可能时采用美国移植与细胞治疗学会(ASTCT)共识分级评估毒性。
与苯达莫司汀相比,氟达拉滨/环磷酰胺在tisagenlecleucel输注后导致更深的淋巴细胞减少,但两组tisagenlecleucel疗效相近。然而,两组不良事件发生率和严重程度存在显著差异。具体而言,苯达莫司汀治疗患者细胞因子释放综合征和神经毒性发生率较低。此外,氟达拉滨/环磷酰胺组血液学毒性发生率较高。苯达莫司汀组患者的中性粒细胞、血红蛋白和血小板最低值较高,血细胞计数恢复时间较短,且血小板和红细胞输注更少。与接受氟达拉滨/环磷酰胺者相比,苯达莫司汀队列感染、中性粒细胞减少性发热和输注后住院事件更少。
tisagenlecleucel输注前使用苯达莫司汀进行淋巴细胞清除,疗效与氟达拉滨/环磷酰胺相近,但毒性更低,包括CRS、神经毒性、感染和血液学毒性,且医疗资源使用减少。
Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell immunotherapy (CAR-T) is now a standard treatment of relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas; however, a significant portion of patients do not respond to CAR-T and/or experience toxicities. Lymphodepleting chemotherapy is a critical component of CAR-T that enhances CAR-T-cell engraftment, expansion, cytotoxicity, and persistence. We hypothesized that the lymphodepletion regimen might affect the safety and efficacy of CAR-T.
We compared the safety and efficacy of lymphodepletion using either fludarabine/cyclophosphamide (n = 42) or bendamustine (n = 90) before tisagenlecleucel in two cohorts of patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas treated consecutively at three academic institutions in the United States (University of Pennsylvania, n = 90; Oregon Health & Science University, n = 35) and Europe (University of Vienna, n = 7). Response was assessed using the Lugano 2014 criteria and toxicities were assessed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 and, when possible, the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) consensus grading.
Fludarabine/cyclophosphamide led to more profound lymphocytopenia after tisagenlecleucel infusion compared with bendamustine, although the efficacy of tisagenlecleucel was similar between the two groups. We observed significant differences, however, in the frequency and severity of adverse events. In particular, patients treated with bendamustine had lower rates of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. In addition, higher rates of hematological toxicities were observed in patients receiving fludarabine/cyclophosphamide. Bendamustine-treated patients had higher nadir neutrophil counts, hemoglobin levels, and platelet counts, as well as a shorter time to blood count recovery, and received fewer platelet and red cell transfusions. Fewer episodes of infection, neutropenic fever, and post-infusion hospitalization were observed in the bendamustine cohort compared with patients receiving fludarabine/cyclophosphamide.
Bendamustine for lymphodepletion before tisagenlecleucel has efficacy similar to fludarabine/cyclophosphamide with reduced toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicity, infectious and hematological toxicities, as well as reduced hospital utilization.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。