← 返回

复发/难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者 CAR-T 细胞疗法的成本效果:治疗地点无影响

英文原题:Cost-Effectiveness of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma: No Impact of Site of Care.

查看英文原题

Cost-Effectiveness of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma: No Impact of Site of Care.

PubMed 2022/06/11(内容时间) Adv Ther Q1 · IF 4.7(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

对于复发/难治性 LBCL 患者,与 tisa-cel 和 liso-cel 相比,Axi-cel 是一种具有成本效益的 CAR-T 细胞疗法。

中文摘要

本支付方模型比较美国 R/R LBCL 患者接受 CAR-T 细胞治疗(axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel]、lisocabtagene maraleucel [liso-cel]、tisagenlecleucel [tisa-cel])后的终身成本和获益。输注后 3 个月成本根据单位成本及 1175 例弥漫性 R/R LBCL 患者的真实世界全支付方治疗场所特异性利用数据计算(CAR-T 细胞治疗时间为 2017 年 10 月至 2020 年 9 月)。不同疗法和治疗场所的 3 级及以上细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)和神经事件(NE)发生率根据已发表试验估算。终身质量调整生命年(QALY)及长期成本根据各疗法的总生存期和无进展生存期数据计算,并针对试验人群差异进行校正。基础情景假设所有疗法均有 17% 在门诊治疗(真实世界数据)。axi-cel 其他基础情景参数采用 ZUMA-1 队列 1/2 数据;情景分析则采用 ZUMA-1 队列 4/6 数据(更新后的安全性管理)。

基础情景下,axi-cel 总成本高于 liso-cel(63.7 万美元 vs 62.1 万美元)和 tisa-cel(63.1 万美元 vs 57.7 万美元)。各疗法输注后 3 个月成本为 5.7 万至 5.9 万美元。axi-cel 总 QALY 也高于 liso-cel(7.7 vs 5.9)和 tisa-cel(7.2 vs 5.0);每增加一个 QALY 的增量成本分别为 0.9 万美元和 2.5 万美元。基础情景下,axi-cel 相较 liso-cel 的增量净货币获益为 25.5 万美元(95% 置信区间 [CI]:18.1 万–32.6 万美元),相较 tisa-cel 为 28 万美元(95% CI:20 万–35.3 万美元)。axi-cel 生存期更长,因此终身成本也更高。在所有情景中(例如改变门诊治疗比例、CRS/NE 发生率),在最高支付意愿低于每 QALY 2.6 万美元时,axi-cel 相较两种对照疗法均具有成本效益,原因是其增量生存获益和生活质量提升更高。

对于 R/R LBCL 患者,与 tisa-cel 和 liso-cel 相比,axi-cel 是一种具有成本效益的 CAR-T 细胞疗法。治疗场所不影响 CAR-T 细胞疗法的成本效益。

展开英文摘要原文

This payer model compares lifetime costs/benefits for CAR T cell-treated (axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel], lisocabtagene maraleucel [liso-cel], tisagenlecleucel [tisa-cel]) patients with R/R LBCL in the USA. Three-month post-infusion costs were derived from unit costs and real-world all-payer (RW) site-specific utilization data for 1175 patients with diffuse R/R LBCL (CAR T cell therapy October 2017-September 2020). Therapy- and site-specific grade 3+ cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic event (NE) incidences were imputed from published trials. Lifetime quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and long-term costs were calculated from therapy-specific overall and progression-free survival data, adjusted for differences in trial populations. The base case used 17% outpatient site (RW) for all therapies. ZUMA-1 trial cohorts 1/2 informed other axi-cel base case inputs; ZUMA-1 cohorts 4/6 data (updated safety management) supported scenario analyses.

Base case total costs for axi-cel exceeded liso-cel ($637 K versus $621 K) and tisa-cel ($631 K versus $577 K) costs. Three-month post-infusion costs were $57 K to $59 K across all therapies. Total QALYs for axi-cel also exceeded those for liso-cel (7.7 versus 5.9) and tisa-cel (7.2 versus 5.0) with incremental costs per QALY gained of $9 K versus liso-cel and $25 K versus tisa-cel. Base case incremental net monetary benefit was $255 K (95% confidence interval (CI) $181-326 K) for axi-cel versus liso-cel, and $280 K (95% CI $200-353 K) versus tisa-cel. Longer survival with axi-cel conferred higher lifetime costs. In all scenarios (e.g., varied outpatient proportions, CRS/NE incidence), axi-cel was cost-effective versus both comparators at a maximum willingness-to-pay of under $26 K/QALY as a result of axi-cel's higher incremental survival gains and quality-of-life.

Axi-cel is a cost-effective CAR T cell therapy for patients with R/R LBCL compared to tisa-cel and liso-cel. Site of care does not impact the cost-effectiveness of CAR T cell therapy.

论文信息

作者
Cummings Joyner AK、Snider JT、Wade SW、Wang ST、Buessing MG、Johnson S、Gergis U
单位
Medicus Economics, LLC, 2 Stonehill Lane, Milton, MA, 02186, USA. alicekate.cummings@medicuseconomics.com.United States
文献类型
非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Advances in therapy2022 Aug
原文标识
PubMed 35689726 · DOI 10.1007/s12325-022-02188-0