CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Cost-Effectiveness of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma: No Impact of Site of Care.
Cost-Effectiveness of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma: No Impact of Site of Care.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
对于复发/难治性 LBCL 患者,与 tisa-cel 和 liso-cel 相比,Axi-cel 是一种具有成本效益的 CAR-T 细胞疗法。
本支付方模型比较美国 R/R LBCL 患者接受 CAR-T 细胞治疗(axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel]、lisocabtagene maraleucel [liso-cel]、tisagenlecleucel [tisa-cel])后的终身成本和获益。输注后 3 个月成本根据单位成本及 1175 例弥漫性 R/R LBCL 患者的真实世界全支付方治疗场所特异性利用数据计算(CAR-T 细胞治疗时间为 2017 年 10 月至 2020 年 9 月)。不同疗法和治疗场所的 3 级及以上细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)和神经事件(NE)发生率根据已发表试验估算。终身质量调整生命年(QALY)及长期成本根据各疗法的总生存期和无进展生存期数据计算,并针对试验人群差异进行校正。基础情景假设所有疗法均有 17% 在门诊治疗(真实世界数据)。axi-cel 其他基础情景参数采用 ZUMA-1 队列 1/2 数据;情景分析则采用 ZUMA-1 队列 4/6 数据(更新后的安全性管理)。
基础情景下,axi-cel 总成本高于 liso-cel(63.7 万美元 vs 62.1 万美元)和 tisa-cel(63.1 万美元 vs 57.7 万美元)。各疗法输注后 3 个月成本为 5.7 万至 5.9 万美元。axi-cel 总 QALY 也高于 liso-cel(7.7 vs 5.9)和 tisa-cel(7.2 vs 5.0);每增加一个 QALY 的增量成本分别为 0.9 万美元和 2.5 万美元。基础情景下,axi-cel 相较 liso-cel 的增量净货币获益为 25.5 万美元(95% 置信区间 [CI]:18.1 万–32.6 万美元),相较 tisa-cel 为 28 万美元(95% CI:20 万–35.3 万美元)。axi-cel 生存期更长,因此终身成本也更高。在所有情景中(例如改变门诊治疗比例、CRS/NE 发生率),在最高支付意愿低于每 QALY 2.6 万美元时,axi-cel 相较两种对照疗法均具有成本效益,原因是其增量生存获益和生活质量提升更高。
对于 R/R LBCL 患者,与 tisa-cel 和 liso-cel 相比,axi-cel 是一种具有成本效益的 CAR-T 细胞疗法。治疗场所不影响 CAR-T 细胞疗法的成本效益。
This payer model compares lifetime costs/benefits for CAR T cell-treated (axicabtagene ciloleucel [axi-cel], lisocabtagene maraleucel [liso-cel], tisagenlecleucel [tisa-cel]) patients with R/R LBCL in the USA. Three-month post-infusion costs were derived from unit costs and real-world all-payer (RW) site-specific utilization data for 1175 patients with diffuse R/R LBCL (CAR T cell therapy October 2017-September 2020). Therapy- and site-specific grade 3+ cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic event (NE) incidences were imputed from published trials. Lifetime quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and long-term costs were calculated from therapy-specific overall and progression-free survival data, adjusted for differences in trial populations. The base case used 17% outpatient site (RW) for all therapies. ZUMA-1 trial cohorts 1/2 informed other axi-cel base case inputs; ZUMA-1 cohorts 4/6 data (updated safety management) supported scenario analyses.
Base case total costs for axi-cel exceeded liso-cel ($637 K versus $621 K) and tisa-cel ($631 K versus $577 K) costs. Three-month post-infusion costs were $57 K to $59 K across all therapies. Total QALYs for axi-cel also exceeded those for liso-cel (7.7 versus 5.9) and tisa-cel (7.2 versus 5.0) with incremental costs per QALY gained of $9 K versus liso-cel and $25 K versus tisa-cel. Base case incremental net monetary benefit was $255 K (95% confidence interval (CI) $181-326 K) for axi-cel versus liso-cel, and $280 K (95% CI $200-353 K) versus tisa-cel. Longer survival with axi-cel conferred higher lifetime costs. In all scenarios (e.g., varied outpatient proportions, CRS/NE incidence), axi-cel was cost-effective versus both comparators at a maximum willingness-to-pay of under $26 K/QALY as a result of axi-cel's higher incremental survival gains and quality-of-life.
Axi-cel is a cost-effective CAR T cell therapy for patients with R/R LBCL compared to tisa-cel and liso-cel. Site of care does not impact the cost-effectiveness of CAR T cell therapy.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。