CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Comparative effectiveness of ZUMA-5 (axi-cel) vs SCHOLAR-5 external control in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.
Comparative effectiveness of ZUMA-5 (axi-cel) vs SCHOLAR-5 external control in relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
在关键的ZUMA-5试验中,axicabtagene ciloleucel(axi-cel;一种自体抗CD19CAR-T 细胞疗法)在复发/难治性(r/r)滤泡性淋巴瘤(FL)患者中显示出高比例的持久缓解。
在此,将ZUMA-5的结果与国际SCHOLAR-5队列进行比较,该队列应用了模拟随机对照试验条件的关键ZUMA-5试验纳入标准。SCHOLAR-5数据提取自5个国家的机构以及1项历史临床试验,纳入2014年7月后开始三线或更高线治疗的r/r FL患者。通过倾向性评分对预设预后因素进行标准化死亡比(SMR)加权,使患者特征达到平衡。采用加权Kaplan-Meier分析评估至事件发生时间结局。使用加权比值比比较总缓解率(ORR)和完全缓解(CR)率。143例SCHOLAR-5患者在SMR加权后缩减为有效样本85例,而ZUMA-5为86例。SCHOLAR-5和ZUMA-5的中位随访时间分别为25.4个月和23.3个月。
SCHOLAR-5的中位总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)分别为59.8个月和12.7个月,而ZUMA-5均未达到。OS和PFS的风险比分别为0.42(95%置信区间[CI],0.21-0.83)和0.30(95% CI,0.18-0.49)。SCHOLAR-5的ORR和CR率分别为49.9%和29.9%,ZUMA-5分别为94.2%和79.1%,比值比分别为16.2(95% CI,5.6-46.9)和8.9(95% CI,4.3-18.3)。与现有疗法相比,axi-cel在具有意义的临床终点方面表现出改善,表明axi-cel满足了r/r FL患者重要的未满足需求。该试验注册于www.ClinicalTrials.gov,编号为#NCT03105336。
In the pivotal ZUMA-5 trial, axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel; an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy) demonstrated high rates of durable response in relapsed/refractory (r/r) follicular lymphoma (FL) patients.
Here, outcomes from ZUMA-5 are compared with the international SCHOLAR-5 cohort, which applied key ZUMA-5 trial eligibility criteria simulating randomized controlled trial conditions. SCHOLAR-5 data were extracted from institutions in 5 countries, and from 1 historical clinical trial, for r/r FL patients who initiated a third or higher line of therapy after July 2014.
Patient characteristics were balanced through propensity scoring on prespecified prognostic factors using standardized mortality ratio (SMR) weighting. Time-to-event outcomes were evaluated using weighted Kaplan-Meier analysis.
Overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) rate were compared using weighted odds ratios. The 143 ScHOLAR-5 patients reduced to an effective sample of 85 patients after SMR weighting vs 86 patients in ZUMA-5. Median follow-up time was 25. 4 and 23. 3 months for SCHOLAR-5 and ZUMA-5. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in SCHOLAR-5 were 59. 8 months and 12. 7 months and not reached in ZUMA-5. Hazard ratios for OS and PFS were 0.
42 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0. 21-0. 83) and 0. 30 (95% CI, 0. 18-0. 49). The ORR and CR rate were 49. 9% and 29. 9% in SCHOLAR-5 and 94. 2% and 79. 1% in ZUMA-5, for odds ratios of 16. 2 (95% CI, 5. 6-46. 9) and 8. 9 (95% CI, 4. 3-18. 3). Compared with available therapies, axi-cel demonstrated an improvement in meaningful clinical endpoints, suggesting axi-cel addresses an important unmet need for r/r FL patients. This trial was registered at www. clinicaltrials. gov as #NCT03105336.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。