γδ T 细胞调节小细胞肺癌中的抗肿瘤免疫
γδ T cells modulate anti-tumor immunity in small cell lung cancer.
我们的发现表明,活化的γδ T细胞可能是SCLC治疗的有价值靶点。
英文原题:Anti-CSF-1R emactuzumab in combination with anti-PD-L1 atezolizumab in advanced solid tumor patients naïve or experienced for immune checkpoint blockade.
Emactuzumab联合atezolizumab显示出可控的安全性特征,与常规atezolizumab单药治疗相比,疲劳和皮疹增加。在ICB经治的NSCLC患者中尤其观察到可观的ORR。治疗期间CD8 +TILs的增加似乎与TAM亚群的持续存在相关。
这项1b期研究(NCT02323191)评估了集落刺激因子-1受体阻断单克隆抗体(mAb)emactuzumab与程序性细胞死亡-1配体(PD-L1)阻断单克隆抗体atezolizumab联合治疗晚期实体瘤患者的安全性、抗肿瘤活性、药代动力学和药效学,这些患者未接受过或已接受过免疫检查点阻断剂(ICBs)治疗。
Emactuzumab(500-1350 mg固定剂量)和atezolizumab(1200 mg固定剂量)每3周静脉给药一次。Emactuzumab的剂量递增采用3+3设计,直至最大耐受剂量(MTD)或最佳生物剂量(OBD)。在转移性ICB初治尿路上皮膀胱癌(UBC)和ICB经治黑色素瘤(MEL)、非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)及UBC患者中开展了扩展队列,以评估药效学和临床活性。
总体而言,221例患者接受了治疗。未达到MTD,OBD确定为1000 mg emactuzumab联合1200 mg atezolizumab。25例(11.3%)患者发生≥3级治疗相关不良事件,其中疲劳和皮疹最常见(各14例(6.3%))。确认的客观缓解率(ORR)分别为:ICB初治UBC为9.8%,ICB经治NSCLC为12.5%,ICB经治UBC为8.3%,ICB经治MEL为5.6%。肿瘤活检分析显示,在ICB初治UBC患者中,活化的CD8+肿瘤浸润T淋巴细胞(TILs)增加与临床获益相关,且与ICB初治患者相比,ICB经治患者的肿瘤相关巨噬细胞(TAM)减少较少。
BACKGROUND: This phase 1b study (NCT02323191) evaluated the safety, antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor-blocking monoclonal antibody (mAb) emactuzumab in combination with the programmed cell death-1 ligand (PD-L1)-blocking mAb atezolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors naïve or experienced for immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs). METHODS: Emactuzumab (500-1350 mg flat) and atezolizumab (1200 mg flat) were administered intravenously every 3 weeks. Dose escalation of emactuzumab was conducted using the 3+3 design up to the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or optimal biological dose (OBD). Extension cohorts to evaluate pharmacodynamics and clinical activity were conducted in metastatic ICB-naive urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) and ICB-pretreated melanoma (MEL), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and UBC patients. RESULTS: Overall, 221 patients were treated. No MTD was reached and the OBD was determined at 1000 mg of emactuzumab in combination with 1200 mg of atezolizumab. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 25 (11.3%) patients of which fatigue and rash were the most common (14 patients (6.3%) each). The confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 9.8% for ICB-naïve UBC, 12.5% for ICB-experienced NSCLC, 8.3% for ICB-experienced UBC and 5.6% for ICB-experienced MEL patients, respectively. Tumor biopsy analyses demonstrated increased activated CD8 +tumor infiltrating T lymphocytes (TILs) associated with clinical benefit in ICB-naïve UBC patients and less tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) reduction in ICB-experienced compared with ICB-naïve patients. CONCLUSION: Emactuzumab in combination with atezolizumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile with increased fatigue and skin rash over usual atezolizumab monotherapy. A considerable ORR was particularly seen in ICB-experienced NSCLC patients. Increase ofCD8 +TILs under therapy appeared to be associated with persistence of a TAM subpopulation.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。