← 返回

接受 CAR-T 细胞治疗者的体验与观点:对在线 Reddit 讨论的定性分析

英文原题:Experiences and perspectives of individuals accessing CAR-T cell therapy: A qualitative analysis of online Reddit discussions.

查看英文原题

Experiences and perspectives of individuals accessing CAR-T cell therapy: A qualitative analysis of online Reddit discussions.

PubMed 2021/09/02(内容时间) J Cancer Policy Q3 · IF 2.2(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

患者及其家属的认知与困境,对于制定能够体察患者体验的技术评估、以及为公平分配资源的政策提供依据,都具有重要意义。政策摘要:我们的研究强调了患者与医生之间平衡决策的重要性,以确保患者了解癌症治疗的风险与获益。研究研究者可依据患者人口学特征对试验参与者进行评估,以确保在互联网接入较不普遍的环境中,个体也能公平地获得参与研究的机会。

研究思路结论见上方概要

几种嵌合抗原受体(CAR-T)T细胞疗法已被批准用于血液系统恶性肿瘤。尽管存在已知的安全性、可及性和成本问题,但关于患者和照护者如何理解CAR-T 等新型治疗及其相关不确定性,目前知之甚少。

我们从Reddit这一在线公共社交媒体网站收集了数据。我们在三个相关的subreddit板块中进行了关键词搜索:r/cancer、r/lymphoma、r/leukemia。我们系统性地提取了帖子及相关评论,并根据我们的纳入标准进行了审查。

我们共识别出186篇帖子,其中87篇被纳入定性分析,时间范围为2013年3月1日至2021年4月15日。采用定性内容分析以识别主题。在被排除的帖子中,88篇包含对其他免疫疗法的讨论,11篇为科学简介。我们识别出四个主题:1)与社区共同应对不确定性,2)寻求治愈,3)管理治疗相关的不确定性,4)克服与可及性相关的不确定性。我们发现患者在寻求获取新型疗法(如CAR-T 疗法)时面临诸多障碍。

展开英文摘要原文

We gathered data from Reddit, an online public social media site. We performed a keyword search in three relevant subreddit threads: r/cancer, r/lymphoma, r/leukemia. We systematically extracted threads and associated comments and reviewed against our inclusion criteria.

We identified a total of 186 posts and 87 were included in the qualitative analysis from March 1, 2013, to April 15, 2021. Qualitative content analysis was used to identify themes. Of those excluded, 88 contained discussions of other immunotherapies and 11 were scientific profiles. We identified four themes: 1) navigating uncertainty with community, 2) finding a cure, 3) managing treatment-related uncertainties, and 4) overcoming uncertainties related to access. We found patients experience numerous barriers when seeking access to novel therapeutics, such as CAR-T therapies.

The perceptions and struggles of patients and their families are relevant for developing technology assessments that are sensitive to patient experiences, as well as to inform policies for equitable resource allocation. POLICY SUMMARY: Our study underscores the importance of balanced decision making between patients and physicians to ensure patients understand the risk and benefits of cancer treatments. Study investigators might evaluate trial participants based on patient demographics to ensure equitable access to studies for individuals in settings where internet access is less common.

论文信息

作者
Jenei K、Burgess M、Peacock S、Raymakers AJN
单位
School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/@kjmeetswrld.Canada
文献类型
非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Journal of cancer policy2021 Dec
原文标识
PubMed 35559799 · DOI 10.1016/j.jcpo.2021.100303