CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Demographic differences among patients treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in the United States.
Demographic differences among patients treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in the United States.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
美国 CAR-T 治疗接受者更可能为白人,也更可能为大都市区居民。这些观察到的人口统计学差异与治疗结果或住院死亡率无关。
目前尚不清楚是否所有美国人都同等受益于CAR-T 细胞疗法的可及性。我们旨在评估接受CAR-T 治疗的成年患者之间是否存在人口统计学差异,并评估CAR-T 治疗结局的预测因素。
目的:在美国全国住院患者样本中评估2018年接受CAR-T 治疗的非霍奇金淋巴瘤、急性淋巴细胞白血病和多发性骨髓瘤的≥18岁患者记录。方法:比较两组CAR-T 接受者(白人和非白人)的急性并发症和住院死亡率。采用logistic回归分析评估社会人口学因素与住院死亡率之间的关联。
在符合纳入标准的1275名CAR-T 接受者中,女性占40.4%,白人占66.9%,黑人占4.2%,西班牙裔占13.3%,亚洲或太平洋岛民占4.2%,美洲原住民占1.3%。高达96.8%的CAR-T 操作在城市教学医院进行,85.3%的CAR-T 接受者居住在大都市县。与非白人相比,白人在接受CAR-T 治疗时更年轻(p < 0.001)。非白人的院内死亡率较高,但无统计学显著性(5.4% vs. 4.4%,p = 0.764)。两个种族群体在住院时间、住院费用或急性毒性反应发生率方面没有差异。我们发现种族与治疗结果之间没有关联。性别、神经毒性和Charlson合并症指数是院内死亡率的显著预测因素。
It is not clear if all Americans have benefitted equally from the availability of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy. We aimed to evaluate if demographic differences existed among adult patients who received CART therapy and to assess predictors of CART treatment outcomes.
Records of patients ≥18 years who received CART therapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and multiple myeloma in 2018 were evaluated in the National Inpatient Sample. Acute complications and inhospital mortality were compared between two groups of CART recipients: Whites and non-Whites. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between sociodemographic factors and inhospital mortality.
Of 1275 CART recipients that met inclusion criteria, there were 40.4% of females, 66.9% of Whites, Blacks (4.2%), Hispanics (13.3%), Asians or Pacific Islanders (4.2%), and Native Americans (1.3%). Up to 96.8% of CART procedures were performed in urban teaching hospitals, and 85.3% of CART recipients lived in metropolitan counties. Non-Whites, compared to Whites, were younger at the time of CART therapy (p < 0.001). The inhospital mortality rate was higher in non-Whites, though not statistically significant (5.4% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.764). There were no differences in length of hospital stay, hospital charges, or rates of acute toxicities between the two race groups. We found no association between race and treatment outcomes. Gender, neurotoxicity, and Charlson Comorbidity Index were significant predictors of inhospital mortality.
CART therapy recipients in the United States were more likely to be Whites and more likely to be residents of metropolitan areas. These observed demographic differences were not associated with treatment outcomes or inhospital mortalities.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。