CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Risk assessment with low-pass whole-genome sequencing of cell-free DNA before CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma.
Risk assessment with low-pass whole-genome sequencing of cell-free DNA before CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
复发/难治性大B细胞淋巴瘤(rrLBCL)患者在接受CD19CAR-T 细胞治疗(CAR-T19)后可获得长期缓解。然而,超过一半的受治者会经历治疗失败。
因此,需要方法来识别可能从替代或巩固治疗中获益的高危患者。我们评估了CAR-T19前游离DNA(cfDNA)的低深度全基因组测序(lpWGS)作为一种新的风险分层方法。
我们对122例在白细胞采集时接受标准治疗CAR-T19的rrLBCL患者的治疗前血浆样本进行了lpWGS,以定义DNA拷贝数改变(CNA)。在多变量筛选中,表示基因组不稳定的高局灶性CNA评分(FCS)是与较差的3个月完全缓解率(28% vs 56%,P = .0029)、无进展生存期(PFS;P = .0007;风险比,2.11)和总生存期(OS;P = .0026;风险比,2.10)相关的最显著治疗前变量。
我们在108例(89%)患者中识别出34个独特的局灶性CNA;其中,导致FAS死亡受体缺失的10q23.3缺失与不良结局的相关性最高,导致较差的PFS(P < .0001;风险比,3.49)和OS(P = .0027;风险比,2.68)。通过将FCS与肿瘤负荷增加的傳統标志物(乳酸脱氢酶升高和>1个结外部位)相结合,我们构建了一个简单的风险模型,能够可靠地对患者进行风险分层。
因此,cfDNA的lpWGS是一种微创检测方法,可以快速识别高危患者,并可能指导未来临床试验中患者选择和靶向治疗的评估。
Patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas (rrLBCL) can achieve long-term remission after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART19).
However, more than half of recipients will experience treatment failure.
Thus, approaches are needed to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from alternative or consolidative therapy.
We evaluated low-pass whole-genome sequencing (lpWGS) of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) before CART19 as a new approach for risk stratification.
We performed lpWGS on pretreatment plasma samples from 122 patients at time of leukapheresis who received standard-of-care CART19 for rrLBCL to define DNA copy number alterations (CNAs). In multivariable selection, high focal CNA score (FCS) denoting genomic instability was the most significant pretreatment variable associated with inferior 3-month complete response rates (28% vs 56%, P = . 0029), progression-free survival (PFS; P = . 0007; hazard ratio, 2. 11), and overall survival (OS; P = . 0026; hazard ratio, 2. 10).
We identified 34 unique focal CNAs in 108 (89%) patients; of these, deletion 10q23. 3 leading to loss of FAS death receptor was the most highly associated with poor outcomes, leading to inferior PFS (P < . 0001; hazard ratio, 3. 49) and OS (P = . 0027; hazard ratio, 2. 68). By combining FCS with traditional markers of increased tumor bulk (elevated lactate dehydrogenase and >1 extranodal site), we built a simple risk model that could reliably risk stratify patients.
Thus, lpWGS of cfDNA is a minimally invasive assay that could rapidly identify high-risk patients and may guide patient selection for and targeted therapies to evaluate in future clinical trials.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。