为肝细胞癌武装 GPC3 CAR-T 细胞:多少才足够,下一步是什么?
Armouring GPC3 CAR T cells for hepatocellular carcinoma: how much is enough and what comes next?
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Efficacy and security of tumor vaccines for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systemic review and meta-analysis of the last 2 decades.
Efficacy and security of tumor vaccines for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systemic review and meta-analysis of the last 2 decades.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
针对 HCC 的肿瘤疫苗,尤其是 DC 疫苗,是安全的且值得探索。
肝细胞癌(HCC)肿瘤疫苗受到广泛关注。全球已开展大量临床试验,但肿瘤疫苗的疗效和安全性仍不明确。本研究旨在评估肿瘤疫苗的疗效与安全性。
在PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science和Cochrane Library数据库检索相关研究,采用随机效应模型对客观缓解率(ORR)、中位OS或中位PFS及其95%置信区间进行荟萃分析;合并个体层面OS和PFS数据并进行生存分析,同时收集所有观察到的不良事件。
纳入31项研究、35个符合条件的队列,共932例HCC患者。合并ORR为7%(95% CI 3%–14%);树突状细胞(DC)疫苗ORR为19%(95% CI 11%–29%),显著高于肽疫苗的1%(95% CI 0%–5%)。合并中位OS和PFS分别为13.67个月(95% CI 8.20–22.80)和6.19个月(95% CI 2.97–12.91)。DC疫苗的中位OS为21.77个月(95% CI 18.33–25.86),长于肽疫苗的10.08个月(95% CI 5.23–19.44);DC疫苗中位PFS为11.01个月(95% CI 5.25–23.09),亦长于肽疫苗的1.97个月(95% CI 1.53–2.54)。与丙肝相关HCC相比,乙肝相关HCC可能从肿瘤疫苗获得更多获益。几乎所有研究中观察到的毒性均为中度或轻微。
HCC肿瘤疫苗,尤其DC疫苗,具有安全性且值得探索;仍需开展更多高质量前瞻性研究。
Tumor vaccines for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an area of intense interest. Tremendous clinical trials have been conducted globally, but the efficacy and security of tumor vaccines are elusive. The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and security of tumor vaccines.
All relevant studies were identified in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science and Cochrane Library databases. Objective response rate (ORR), median overall survival (OS), or median progression-free survival (PFS) and 95% CI were meta-analyzed based on the random-effects model. The individual-level data of OS, PFS were pooled by conducting survival analysis. All observed adverse events were collected.
31 studies containing 35 eligible cohorts with 932 HCC patients were included. The pooled ORR were 7% (95% CI 3-14%), while ORR of dendritic cell (DC) vaccine (19%, 95% CI 11-29%) were highly significant than ORR of peptide vaccine (1%, 95% CI 0-5%). The pooled median OS and PFS were 13.67 months (95% CI 8.20-22.80) and 6.19 months (95% CI 2.97-12.91), respectively. The pooled median OS (DC vaccine: median OS = 21.77 months, 95% CI 18.33-25.86; Peptide vaccine: median OS = 10.08 months, 95% CI 5.23-19.44) and PFS (DC vaccine: median PFS = 11.01 months, 95% CI 5.25-23.09; Peptide vaccine: median PFS = 1.97 months, 95% CI 1.53-2.54) of DC vaccine were also longer than that of peptide vaccine. HBV-related HCC may acquire more benefits from tumor vaccines than HCV-related HCC. In almost all studies, the observed toxicities were moderate even tiny.
Tumor vaccines for HCC, especially DC vaccine, are safe and worth exploring. More high-quality prospective studies are warranted.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。