← 返回

初治放化疗联合或不联合西达本胺(Tucidinostat)治疗中高危早期结外鼻型 NK/T 细胞淋巴瘤患者:中国一项随机 2 期研究

英文原题:First-Line Chemoradiation With or Without Chidamide (Tucidinostat) in Patients With Intermediate- and High-Risk Early-Stage Extranodal Nasal-Type Natural Killer/T-Cell Lymphoma: A Randomized Phase 2 Study in China.

查看英文原题

First-Line Chemoradiation With or Without Chidamide (Tucidinostat) in Patients With Intermediate- and High-Risk Early-Stage Extranodal Nasal-Type Natural Killer/T-Cell Lymphoma: A Randomized Phase 2 Study in China.

PubMed 2022/04/20(内容时间) Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Q1 · IF 7.4(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

研究概要

在中危和高危早期 ENKTCL 患者中,与 IMRT + GDP 相比,在 IMRT + GDP 基础上加用西达本胺作为一线治疗取得了相似的治疗结局和可耐受的毒性。

研究思路结论见上方概要

我们研究了调强放射治疗(IMRT)后接吉西他滨、地塞米松、顺铂(GDP)联合西达本胺在中高危早期结外自然杀伤/T细胞淋巴瘤,鼻型(ENKTCL)一线治疗中的安全性和疗效特征。

这是一项在中国2个中心进行的开放标签、随机2期试验。患者若新诊断为中危和高危早期ENKTCL,且根据列线图修订风险指数至少具有一项危险因素,则符合入组条件:>60岁、血清乳酸脱氢酶升高、原发肿瘤侵犯、II期或东部肿瘤协作组体能状态>1或II期疾病。患者在一线治疗中接受IMRT后接GDP,联合或不联合西达本胺。2年无进展生存期(PFS)为主要终点。毒性、2年总生存期(OS)和缓解率为次要终点。

共纳入符合条件患者74例,入组时间为2015年5月至2019年12月。其中37例接受IMRT + GDP + 西达本胺治疗(西达本胺组),37例接受IMRT + GDP治疗(对照组)。中位随访时间为43.4个月(范围1.0-74.6个月)。治疗完成时,西达本胺组客观缓解率为86.5%,对照组为78.4%(P = .359)。西达本胺组2年OS率和PFS率分别为89.2%和75.2%,对照组分别为83.8%(P = .388)和70.2%(P = .821)。主要不良事件为血液学毒性和黏膜炎,两组发生率相似(P > .05)。

展开英文摘要原文

We investigated the safety and efficacy profile of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) followed by gemcitabine, dexamethasone, cisplatin (GDP), plus chidamide in the first-line setting for intermediate- and high-risk early-stage extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKTCL).

This was an open-label, randomized phase 2 trial performed at 2 centers in China. Patients were eligible if they were newly-diagnosed with intermediate- and high-risk early-stage ENKTCL with at least one risk factor based on a nomogram-revised risk index: >60 years old, elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase, invasion of the primary tumor, stage II or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status >1 or stage II disease. Patients were treated with IMRT followed by GDP, with or without chidamide, in the first-line setting. Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) comprised the primary endpoint. Toxicities, the 2-year overall survival (OS), and the response rate comprised the secondary endpoints.

Eligible patients (N = 74) were enrolled between May 2015 and December 2019. Among them, 37 patients were treated with IMRT + GDP + chidamide (chidamide group), whereas 37 cases were treated with IMRT + GDP (control group). Follow-up comprised a median of 43.4 months (range, 1.0-74.6 months). The objective response rate was 86.5% in the chidamide group and 78.4% in the control group (P = .359) at the end of treatment completion. The 2 year OS and PFS rates were 89.2% and 75.2% in the chidamide group versus 83.8% (P = .388) and 70.2% (P = .821) in the control group. The main adverse events were hematological toxicities and mucositis, with similar rates in the 2 groups (P > .05).

The addition of chidamide to IMRT + GDP as first-line treatment achieved similar treatment outcomes and tolerable toxicities compared with IMRT + GDP in patients with intermediate- and high-risk early-stage ENKTCL.

论文信息

作者
Chai Y、Chen B、Qi F、Fang H、Qi SN、Guo RY、Li N、Yang Y
第一作者单位
Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.China
通讯作者单位
Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. Electronic address: dongmei030224@163.com.China
文献类型
II 期临床试验 · 随机对照试验 · 非美国政府资助研究
期刊
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2022 Jul 15
原文标识
PubMed 35452752 · DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.001