复发/难治性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤三线或后线治疗中 CAR-T 细胞疗法的匹配调整间接治疗比较：lisocabtagene maraleucel 对比 tisagenlecleucel

There are no head-to-head clinical studies comparing chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies for the treatment of relapsed or refractory aggressive large B-cell lymphomas. Naive, indirect comparisons may be inappropriate, as the study designs and patient populations could differ substantially. Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAIC) can reduce many biases associated with indirect comparisons between studies. To determine the comparative efficacy and safety of lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) to tisagenlecleucel, we describe an unanchored MAIC of the pivotal studies TRANSCEND NHL 001 (TRANSCEND; NCT02631044; liso-cel) and JULIET (NCT02445248; tisagenlecleucel).

Individual patient data (IPD) from TRANSCEND were available to the authors; for the JULIET pivotal study, summary-level data from the published study were used. To balance the populations between two studies, IPD from TRANSCEND were adjusted to match the marginal distribution (e.g., mean, variance) of clinical factors among patients from JULIET.

Results from the primary MAIC showed liso-cel had statistically significant greater efficacy than tisagenlecleucel (objective response rate: odds ratio [OR] = 2.78, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.63 4.74; complete response rate: OR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.22 3.30; progression-free survival: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.47 0.91; overall survival: HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47 0.95). MAIC of safety outcomes showed lower ORs for all-grade and grade 3 cytokine release syndrome, and grade 3 prolonged cytopenia for liso-cel when compared with tisagenlecleucel; there were no statistically significant differences detected for other safety outcomes.

Overall, this MAIC of two CAR T-cell therapies indicates liso-cel had favorable efficacy and a comparable or better safety profile relative to tisagenlecleucel. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02631044 and NCT02445248.