← 返回

Brexucabtagene Autoleucel 与最佳支持治疗用于加拿大接受 Bruton 酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗后复发/难治性套细胞淋巴瘤的成本效益比较

英文原题:Cost-Effectiveness of Brexucabtagene Autoleucel versus Best Supportive Care for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma following Treatment with a Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in Canada.

查看英文原题

Cost-Effectiveness of Brexucabtagene Autoleucel versus Best Supportive Care for the Treatment of Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma following Treatment with a Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in Canada.

PubMed 2022/03/17(内容时间) Curr Oncol Q2 · IF 3.6(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

对于套细胞淋巴瘤(MCL)患者,在接受布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(BTKi)治疗后的复发/难治性(R/R)疾病尚无公认的标准治疗方案。Brexucabtagene autoleucel(brexu-cel)是MCL中一种有前景的新治疗方式。

我们探讨了brexu-cel治疗R/R MCL是否具有成本效益。我们开发了一种分区生存混合治愈方法,以在终生时间范围内对成本和结局进行建模。临床数据来源于ZUMA-2临床试验。成本估算自加拿大公开数据库、已发表的肿瘤学文献以及泛加拿大肿瘤药物评审经济指导报告。健康状态效用值来源于依鲁替尼提交至英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所用于R/R MCL的资料,并辅以已发表肿瘤学文献中的数值。在终生时间范围的base case中,与BSC相比,brexu-cel产生了9.56个增量生命年和额外7.03个质量调整生命年,同时伴有621,933加元的额外成本。与BSC相比,由此产生的增量成本效用比为每获得一个QALY 88,503加元。基于该分析,我们发现,在加拿大,对于既往接受过BTKi治疗的成人R/R MCL患者,相对于BSC,brexu-cel是对医疗资源具有成本效益的使用,不过仍需要更长期随访数据的研究来确认这些结果。

展开英文摘要原文

For patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL), there is no recognized standard of care for relapsed/refractory (R/R) disease after treatment with a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi). Brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) represents a promising new treatment modality in MCL.

We explored whether brexu-cel was cost-effective for the treatment of R/R MCL.

We developed a partitioned survival mixture cure approach to model the costs and outcomes over a lifetime horizon. The clinical data were derived from the ZUMA-2 clinical trial. The costs were estimated from the publicly available Canadian databases, published oncology literature, and pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review economic guidance reports. The health state utilities were sourced from the ibrutinib submission to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence for R/R MCL and supplemented with values from the published oncology literature.

In the base case over a lifetime horizon, brexu-cel generated an incremental 9. 56 life-years and an additional 7. 03 quality-adjusted life-years compared to BSC, while associated with CAD 621,933 in additional costs. The resultant incremental cost-utility ratio was CAD 88,503 per QALY gained compared with BSC.

Based on this analysis, we found brexu-cel to be a cost-effective use of healthcare resources relative to BSC for treatment of adult patients with R/R MCL previously treated with a BTKi in Canada, though additional research is needed to confirm these results using longer follow-up data.

论文信息

作者
Ball G、Lemieux C、Cameron D、Seftel MD
第一作者单位
Gilead Sciences Canada, Inc., Mississauga, ON L5N 2W3, Canada.Canada
通讯作者单位
Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V1Y 1T3, Canada.Canada
文献类型
非美国政府资助研究
期刊
Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022 Mar 17
原文标识
PubMed 35323364 · DOI 10.3390/curroncol29030164