CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:GLA/DRST real-world outcome analysis of CAR T-cell therapies for large B-cell lymphoma in Germany.
GLA/DRST real-world outcome analysis of CAR T-cell therapies for large B-cell lymphoma in Germany.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
CD19 靶向嵌合抗原受体 (CAR) T 细胞已发展为复发/难治性 (r/r) 大 B 细胞淋巴瘤 (LBCL) 患者的一种新的标准治疗 (SOC)。
在此,我们报告首批关于 SOC CAR-T 细胞治疗的德国真实世界数据,旨在探索与结局相关的风险因素。接受 SOC 阿基仑赛 (axi-cel) 或替沙仑赛 (tisa-cel) 治疗 LBCL 并注册于德国干细胞移植登记处 (DRST) 的患者符合条件。分析的主要结局为毒性、缓解、总生存期 (OS) 和无进展生存期 (PFS)。
我们报告了 2018 年 11 月至 2021 年 4 月期间在 21 个德国中心接受 axi-cel (n = 173) 或 tisa-cel (n = 183) 治疗的 356 例患者。尽管 axi-cel 和 tisa-cel 队列在年龄、性别、乳酸脱氢酶 (LDH)、国际预后指数 (IPI) 和预处理方面具有可比性,但 tisa-cel 组中体能状态差、不符合 ZUMA-1 入组条件以及需要桥接治疗的患者分别显著更多。中位随访 11 个月时,给药后 12 个月的 OS、PFS 和非复发死亡 (NRM) 的 Kaplan-Meier 估计值分别为 52%、30% 和 6%。虽然 NRM 主要由长期中性粒细胞减少和/或严重神经毒性后的感染驱动,并且在 axi-cel 中显著更高,但多变量分析中 PFS 的显著风险因素包括桥接失败、LDH 升高、年龄和 tisa-cel 使用。
总之,本研究表明,在真实世界环境中,CD19 靶向 CAR-T 细胞治疗 LBCL 的重要结局决定因素是桥接成功、CAR-T 产品选择、LDH,以及无长期中性粒细胞减少和/或严重神经毒性。这些发现可能对设计风险适应性CAR-T 细胞治疗策略具有意义。
CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have evolved as a new standard-of-care (SOC) treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL).
Here, we report the first German real-world data on SOC CAR T-cell therapies with the aim to explore risk factors associated with outcomes. Patients who received SOC axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) for LBCL and were registered with the German Registry for Stem Cell Transplantation (DRST) were eligible. The main outcomes analyzed were toxicities, response, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).
We report 356 patients who received axi-cel (n = 173) or tisa-cel (n = 183) between November 2018 and April 2021 at 21 German centers. Whereas the axi-cel and tisa-cel cohorts were comparable for age, sex, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), international prognostic index (IPI), and pretreatment, the tisa-cel group comprised significantly more patients with poor performance status, ineligibility for ZUMA-1, and the need for bridging, respectively.
With a median follow-up of 11 months, Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS, PFS, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) 12 months after dosing were 52%, 30%, and 6%, respectively. While NRM was largely driven by infections subsequent to prolonged neutropenia and/or severe neurotoxicity and significantly higher with axi-cel, significant risk factors for PFS on the multivariate analysis included bridging failure, elevated LDH, age, and tisa-cel use.
In conclusion, this study suggests that important outcome determinants of CD19-directed CAR T-cell treatment of LBCL in the real-world setting are bridging success, CAR-T product selection, LDH, and the absence of prolonged neutropenia and/or severe neurotoxicity.
These findings may have implications for designing risk-adapted CAR T-cell therapy strategies.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。