← 返回

新辅助治疗的胃肠道癌症患者脾脏和外周血免疫恢复情况

英文原题:Splenic and PB immune recovery in neoadjuvant treated gastrointestinal cancer patients.

查看英文原题

Splenic and PB immune recovery in neoadjuvant treated gastrointestinal cancer patients.

PubMed 2022/02/21(内容时间) Int Immunopharmacol Q1 · IF 5.6(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

近年来,免疫治疗,尤其是免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI),联合化疗和手术已对某些肿瘤类型显示出治疗活性。然而,关于免疫治疗与标准治疗及方法的最佳联合方案知之甚少。在胃肠道(GI)癌症患者中,尤其是胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC),术前(新辅助)化疗增加了可接受手术的患者数量并改善了其缓解情况。

然而,大多数化疗具有免疫抑制作用,且很少有研究探讨新辅助化疗(NCT)对患者免疫力的影响和/或化疗与免疫治疗的最佳联合方案。

此外,大多数针对癌症患者免疫调节的化疗/免疫治疗研究集中于术后(辅助)化疗,且局限于外周血(PB)和偶尔的TIL(肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞)(TILs);这些仅代表宿主免疫细胞中的少数。

我们此前的研究检测了GI癌症患者PB和脾脏中髓系和淋系细胞的表型及频率,不依赖于化疗方案。这些结果促使我们质疑NCT对宿主免疫的影响。

我们在此报告独特的 study,检测了接受NCT治疗的GI癌症患者脾脏和PB中髓系和淋系细胞群体的表型、频率和数量,并与未接受治疗的癌症患者和良性GI肿瘤手术患者进行比较。

总体而言,我们注意到NCT后6周(手术时)的患者与未接受治疗的患者相比,免疫学差异有限,支持免疫快速正常化。我们观察到,与初治癌症患者和良性胃肠道肿瘤患者相比,NCT患者的脾脏中髓源性抑制细胞(MDSCs)频率较低,但PB中未见差异。

此外,与未治疗癌症患者和良性胃肠道肿瘤患者相比,NCT患者的脾脏和PB中CD4+ T细胞频率及检查点蛋白表达较高。有趣的是,在接受NCT治疗的癌症患者中,PB和脾脏中成熟(CD45RO+)CD4+和CD8+ T细胞的频率高于初治患者。这些差异可能部分还与患者分期、肿瘤分级和/或NCT治疗方案相关。

总之,胃肠道癌症患者接受NCT治疗约6周后,手术时白细胞表型谱与初治胃肠道癌症患者(即接受辅助治疗的患者)相似;这表明NCT可能不会限制对免疫干预的反应,并可能因脾脏MDSCs频率较低和成熟T细胞频率较高而改善肿瘤反应。

展开英文摘要原文

In recent years, immune therapy, notably immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), in conjunction with chemotherapy and surgery has demonstrated therapeutic activity for some tumor types.

However, little is known about the optimal combination of immune therapy with standard of care therapies and approaches. In patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, especially pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy has increased the number of patients who can undergo surgery and improved their responses.

However, most chemotherapy is immunosuppressive, and few studies have examined the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) on patient immunity and/or the optimal combination of chemotherapy with immune therapy.

Furthermore, the majority of chemo/immunotherapy studies focused on immune regulation in cancer patients have focused on postoperative (adjuvant) chemotherapy and are limited to peripheral blood (PB) and occasionally tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs); representing a minority of immune cells in the host.

Our previous studies examined the phenotype and frequencies of myeloid and lymphoid cells in the PB and spleens of GI cancer patients, independent of chemotherapy regimen. These results led us to question the impact of NCT on host immunity.

We report herein, unique studies examining the splenic and PB phenotypes, frequencies, and numbers of myeloid and lymphoid cell populations in NCT treated GI cancer patients, as compared to treatment naïve cancer patients and patients with benign GI tumors at surgery.

Overall, we noted limited immunological differences in patients 6 weeks following NCT (at surgery), as compared to treatment naive patients, supporting rapid immune normalization.

We observed that NCT patients had a lower myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) frequency in the spleen, but not the PB, as compared to treatment naive cancer patients and patients with benign GI tumors. Further, NCT patients had a higher splenic and PB frequency of CD4 + T-cells, and checkpoint protein expression, as compared to untreated, cancer patients and patients with benign GI tumors. Interestingly, in NCT treated cancer patients the frequency of mature (CD45RO + ) CD4 + and CD8 + T-cells in the PB and spleens was higher than in treatment naive patients.

These differences may also be associated, in part with patient stage, tumor grade, and/or NCT treatment regimen. In summary, the phenotypic profile of leukocytes at the time of surgery, approximately 6 weeks following NCT treatment in GI cancer patients, are similar to treatment naive GI cancer patients (i. e. , patients who receive adjuvant therapy); suggesting that NCT may not limit the response to immune intervention and may improve tumor responses due to the lower splenic frequency of MDSCs and higher frequency of mature T-cells.

论文信息

作者
Cole KE、Ly QP、Hollingsworth MA、Cox JL、Fisher KW、Padussis JC、Foster JM、Vargas LM
第一作者单位
Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198 USA.United States
通讯作者单位
Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198 USA; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA. Electronic address: jtalmadg@unmc.edu.United States
期刊
International immunopharmacology2022 May
原文标识
PubMed 35203041 · DOI 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.108628