← 返回

复发/难治性弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤伴高肿瘤负荷患者中程序性死亡受体 1 抑制剂联合抗 CD19 CAR-T 细胞治疗后程序性死亡受体 1 抑制剂维持治疗的疗效

英文原题:Efficacy of programmed cell death 1 inhibitor maintenance therapy after combined treatment with programmed cell death 1 inhibitors and anti-CD19-chimeric antigen receptor T cells in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and high tumor burden.

查看英文原题

Efficacy of programmed cell death 1 inhibitor maintenance therapy after combined treatment with programmed cell death 1 inhibitors and anti-CD19-chimeric antigen receptor T cells in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and high tumor burden.

PubMed 2022/03/01(内容时间) Hematol Oncol Q1 · IF 4.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

我们研究了程序性细胞死亡1(PD-1)抑制剂与抗CD19嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞联合治疗及后续PD-1抑制剂维持治疗在高肿瘤负荷的复发/难治性(R/R)弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者中的疗效和安全性。

本研究纳入了44例高肿瘤负荷的R/R DLBCL患者。实验组26例患者接受PD-1抑制剂与抗CD19-CAR-T 细胞联合治疗,而对照组18例患者仅接受抗CD19-CAR-T 细胞治疗。联合组和对照组的客观缓解率(ORR)分别为65.39%和61.11%。联合治疗组中达到完全缓解或部分缓解的患者选择接受PD-1抑制剂维持治疗。在CAR-T 细胞输注后3个月和12个月,联合组的无进展生存率和总生存率均高于对照组。两组在细胞因子释放综合征或免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征分级方面无显著差异。在维持治疗组中,仅8例患者出现1级常见不良事件评价标准(CTCAE),3例出现2级CTCAE。

总体而言,我们发现PD-1抑制剂与抗CD19-CAR-T 细胞联合治疗未影响ORR。然而,达到ORR的患者可能从联合治疗后的PD-1抑制剂维持治疗中获益,且未增加副作用。

展开英文摘要原文

We studied the efficacy and safety of the combined treatment with programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors and anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and subsequent PD-1 inhibitor maintenance treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and high tumor burden. Forty-four R/R DLBCL patients with high tumor burden were enrolled in this study. The experimental group of 26 patients received combined therapy with PD-1 inhibitors and anti-CD19-CAR T cells, while the control group of 18 patients received anti-CD19-CAR T-cell therapy alone. The objective response rate (ORR) was 65. 39% and 61.

11% in the combination and control groups, respectively. The PD-1 inhibitor maintenance therapy was selected for patients who achieved complete response or partial response in the combination therapy group. Progression-free survival and overall survival rates in the combination group were higher than those in the control group 3 and 12 months after CAR T-cell infusion.

There was no significant difference in the grade of cytokine release syndrome or immune effector cell associated neurotoxic syndrome between the two groups. In the maintenance therapy group, only eight patients experienced grade 1 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and three grade 2 CTCAE.

Overall, we found that the ORR was not affected by the combination therapy with PD-1 inhibitors and anti-CD19-CAR T cells.

However, patients who had achieved the ORR might benefit from PD-1 inhibitor maintenance therapy after combination therapy without increased side effects.

论文信息

作者
Mu J、Deng H、Lyu C、Yuan J、Li Q、Wang J、Jiang Y、Deng Q
第一作者单位
Department of Hematology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.China
通讯作者单位
Department of Hematology, Characteristic Medical Center of Chinese People's Armed Police Force, Tianjin, China.China
期刊
Hematological oncology2023 Apr
原文标识
PubMed 35195933 · DOI 10.1002/hon.2981