不适合移植的大 B 细胞淋巴瘤二线使用 axicabtagene ciloleucel:ALYCANTE 最终分析
Second-line axicabtagene ciloleucel in large B-cell lymphoma ineligible for transplantation: ALYCANTE final analysis.
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel vs. Tisagenlecleucel for the Management of Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Spain.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel vs. Tisagenlecleucel for the Management of Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Spain.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
本研究旨在评估在西班牙,对于接受过≥2线系统性治疗后的复发/难治性(R/R)弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL),axicabtagene ciloleucel(axi-cel)相比tisagenlecleucel(tisa-cel)的成本效果。采用终身分区生存混合治愈模型,该模型包括进展前、进展后和死亡健康状态,用于估算累积成本以及以生命年增益(LYG)和质量调整生命年(QALY)表示的产出。采用匹配调整间接比较,将ZUMA-1(axi-cel的关键临床试验)的患者水平数据重新加权至tisa-cel关键试验JULIET的聚合水平数据。分析从国家卫生系统视角进行,因此仅纳入直接成本。进行了敏感性分析(SA)。与tisa-cel相比,axi-cel每例患者获得2.74个增量LYG和2.31个额外QALY。axi-cel相比tisa-cel的总增量终身成本为每例患者€30,135。axi-cel相比tisa-cel的增量成本效果比为€10,999/LYG,增量成本效用比为€13,049/QALY增益。SA证明了结果的稳健性。考虑到西班牙常用的支付意愿阈值(€22,000/QALY和€60,000/QALY),axi-cel相比tisa-cel是西班牙R/R DLBCL成年患者的一种具有成本效果的治疗方案。
The study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) vs. tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after ≥2 lines of systemic therapy in Spain. A lifetime partitioned survival mixture cure model, which comprises pre-progression, post-progression, and death health states, was used to estimate the accumulated costs and outcomes in terms of life years gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life years (QALY). A matching-adjusted indirect comparison was used to reweight patient-level data from ZUMA-1, the pivotal clinical trial for axi-cel, to aggregate-level data from the pivotal tisa-cel trial, JULIET.
The analysis was performed from the National Health System perspective, thus only direct costs were included. Sensitivity analyses (SA) were performed. Axi-cel yielded 2. 74 incremental LYG and 2. 31 additional QALY gained per patient compared to tisa-cel. Total incremental lifetime costs for axi-cel versus tisa-cel were €30,135/patient.
The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of axi-cel versus tisa-cel resulted in €10,999/LYG and the incremental cost-utility ratio in €13,049/QALY gained. SA proved robustness of the results. Considering the frequently assumed willingness-to-pay thresholds in Spain (€22,000/QALY and €60,000/QALY), axi-cel is a cost-effective treatment vs. tisa-cel for adult patients with R/R DLBCL in Spain.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。