CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy combined with autologous stem cell transplantation improved progression-free survival of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients: A single-center, retrospective, cohort study.
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy combined with autologous stem cell transplantation improved progression-free survival of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients: A single-center, retrospective, cohort study.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
自体造血干细胞移植(ASCT)和CAR-T 细胞疗法(CAR-T)是用于治疗复发/难治性(R/R)弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的挽救性疗法。
然而,ASCT与CAR-T 联合治疗(ASCT-CART)能否改善R/R DLBCL的生存尚不清楚。共纳入67例R/R DLBCL患者,其中21例接受ASCT-CART治疗,46例接受ASCT治疗。ASCT-CART组和ASCT组输注的单核细胞中位数分别为4.71 × 10 8 /kg和5.36 × 10 8 /kg(p = 0.469)。ASCT-CART组和ASCT组输注的CD34 + 细胞中位数分别为2.41 × 10 6 /kg和3.05 × 10 6 /kg(p = 0.663)。输注的CAR-T 细胞中位数为2.63 × 10 6 /kg,中位转导率为59.83%。ASCT-CART和ASCT治疗的客观缓解率分别为90%和89%(p = 1.000)。
然而,ASCT-CART组的完全缓解(CR)率高于ASCT组(71% vs. 33%;p = 0.003)。与ASCT组相比,ASCT-CART组表现出更优的3年无进展生存期(PFS)(80% vs. 44%;p = 0.036)和更低的3年复发/进展率(15% vs. 56%;p = 0.015)。
然而,3年总生存期结果显示两组之间无差异(80% vs. 69%;p = 0.545)。对于R/R DLBCL患者,ASCT-CART治疗与更高的CR率、更好的PFS和更低的复发/进展率相关。这些数据支持ASCT-CART治疗可作为R/R DLBCL患者的挽救性疗法。
Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) are salvage therapies that are utilised for treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
However, whether the combination therapy of ASCT and CART (ASCT-CART) can improve the survival of R/R DLBCL remains unknown.
Overall, 67 R/R DLBCL patients were included, among which 21 patients underwent ASCT-CART therapy and 46 patients underwent ASCT therapy. The median number of mononuclear cells numbers that were infused in the ASCT-CART and ASCT groups was 4. 71 × 10 8 /kg and 5. 36 × 10 8 /kg, respectively (p = 0. 469).
The median number of CD34 + cell numbers that were infused in the ASCT-CART and ASCT groups was 2. 41 × 10 6 /kg and 3. 05 × 10 6 /kg, respectively (p = 0. 663). The median number of CART cells that were infused was 2. 63 × 10 6 /kg with a median transduction rate of 59. 83%. The objective response rates to ASCT-CART and ASCT therapy were 90% and 89%, respectively (p = 1. 000).
However, the ASCT-CART group showed higher complete remission (CR) rates than the ASCT group (71% vs. 33%; p = 0. 003). The ASCT-CART group demonstrated superior 3 year progression-free survival (PFS) (80% vs. 44%; p = 0. 036) and lower 3 year relapse/progression rate (15% vs. 56%; p = 0. 015) compared to the ASCT group.
However, the 3 year overall survival results indicated that there were no differences between the two groups (80% vs. 69%; p = 0. 545). For R/R DLBCL patients, ASCT-CART therapy is associated with higher CR rate, better PFS, and lower relapse/progression rate. These data support that ASCT-CART therapy can be used as a salvage therapy for R/R DLBCL patients.
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。