← 返回

CAR-T 细胞疗法联合自体干细胞移植改善了复发/难治性弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者的无进展生存期:一项单中心、回顾性、队列研究

英文原题:Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy combined with autologous stem cell transplantation improved progression-free survival of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients: A single-center, retrospective, cohort study.

查看英文原题

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy combined with autologous stem cell transplantation improved progression-free survival of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients: A single-center, retrospective, cohort study.

PubMed 2022/02/22(内容时间) Hematol Oncol Q1 · IF 4.1(JCR 2025)

分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。

中文摘要

自体造血干细胞移植(ASCT)和CAR-T 细胞疗法(CAR-T)是用于治疗复发/难治性(R/R)弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的挽救性疗法。

然而,ASCT与CAR-T 联合治疗(ASCT-CART)能否改善R/R DLBCL的生存尚不清楚。共纳入67例R/R DLBCL患者,其中21例接受ASCT-CART治疗,46例接受ASCT治疗。ASCT-CART组和ASCT组输注的单核细胞中位数分别为4.71 × 10 8 /kg和5.36 × 10 8 /kg(p = 0.469)。ASCT-CART组和ASCT组输注的CD34 + 细胞中位数分别为2.41 × 10 6 /kg和3.05 × 10 6 /kg(p = 0.663)。输注的CAR-T 细胞中位数为2.63 × 10 6 /kg,中位转导率为59.83%。ASCT-CART和ASCT治疗的客观缓解率分别为90%和89%(p = 1.000)。

然而,ASCT-CART组的完全缓解(CR)率高于ASCT组(71% vs. 33%;p = 0.003)。与ASCT组相比,ASCT-CART组表现出更优的3年无进展生存期(PFS)(80% vs. 44%;p = 0.036)和更低的3年复发/进展率(15% vs. 56%;p = 0.015)。

然而,3年总生存期结果显示两组之间无差异(80% vs. 69%;p = 0.545)。对于R/R DLBCL患者,ASCT-CART治疗与更高的CR率、更好的PFS和更低的复发/进展率相关。这些数据支持ASCT-CART治疗可作为R/R DLBCL患者的挽救性疗法。

展开英文摘要原文

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART) are salvage therapies that are utilised for treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

However, whether the combination therapy of ASCT and CART (ASCT-CART) can improve the survival of R/R DLBCL remains unknown.

Overall, 67 R/R DLBCL patients were included, among which 21 patients underwent ASCT-CART therapy and 46 patients underwent ASCT therapy. The median number of mononuclear cells numbers that were infused in the ASCT-CART and ASCT groups was 4. 71 × 10 8 /kg and 5. 36 × 10 8 /kg, respectively (p = 0. 469).

The median number of CD34 + cell numbers that were infused in the ASCT-CART and ASCT groups was 2. 41 × 10 6 /kg and 3. 05 × 10 6 /kg, respectively (p = 0. 663). The median number of CART cells that were infused was 2. 63 × 10 6 /kg with a median transduction rate of 59. 83%. The objective response rates to ASCT-CART and ASCT therapy were 90% and 89%, respectively (p = 1. 000).

However, the ASCT-CART group showed higher complete remission (CR) rates than the ASCT group (71% vs. 33%; p = 0. 003). The ASCT-CART group demonstrated superior 3 year progression-free survival (PFS) (80% vs. 44%; p = 0. 036) and lower 3 year relapse/progression rate (15% vs. 56%; p = 0. 015) compared to the ASCT group.

However, the 3 year overall survival results indicated that there were no differences between the two groups (80% vs. 69%; p = 0. 545). For R/R DLBCL patients, ASCT-CART therapy is associated with higher CR rate, better PFS, and lower relapse/progression rate. These data support that ASCT-CART therapy can be used as a salvage therapy for R/R DLBCL patients.

论文信息

作者
Wang T、Xu L、Gao L、Tang G、Chen L、Chen J、Wang Y、Fu W
单位
Department of Hematology, Institute of Hematology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.China
期刊
Hematological oncology2022 Oct
原文标识
PubMed 35141937 · DOI 10.1002/hon.2975