CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞疗法在非肿瘤性疾病中的应用
Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in non-oncological diseases.
CAR-T(CAR-T)细胞在血液系统恶性肿瘤中的应用推动了这种免疫治疗形式的显著进展。
CELL INTELLIGENCE · 肿瘤细胞治疗研究
肿瘤细胞治疗研究
英文原题:Effect of early granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor administration in the prevention of febrile neutropenia and impact on toxicity and efficacy of anti-CD19 CAR-T in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma.
Effect of early granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor administration in the prevention of febrile neutropenia and impact on toxicity and efficacy of anti-CD19 CAR-T in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma.
分数与星级只用于站内排序 —— 不代表疗效、安全性或个人适用性。
CAR-T 细胞是复发/难治性(R/R)弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的一种突破性治疗选择。细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)和免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)是最常见的特异性毒性,而重度中性粒细胞减少和感染也常被观察到。自2020年3月起,系统性地提出在输注后第(D)2天进行早期G-CSF预防。随后我们将该日期之前未接受G-CSF或接受晚期(D5之后)G-CSF治疗的患者作为对照组进行比较。接受早期G-CSF的患者4级中性粒细胞减少持续时间相似,但发热性中性粒细胞减少的发生率显著降低(58% versus 81%,p = 0.018)。观察到的毒性发生率相似,包括总体及3-4级CRS(分别为p = 0.93和p = 0.28),以及总体及3-4级ICANS(分别为p = 0.62和p = 0.88)。
我们观察到CAR-T 细胞扩增质量无差异(p = 0.79,%Cmax),缓解率也无差异(最佳ORR,57.6% vs 61.8%,p = 0.93),即使在通过倾向性评分校正的一组患者中,生存也无差异。
总之,早期给予G-CSF是安全且有效的,可减少发热性中性粒细胞减少,且不影响毒性,也不影响CAR-T 的抗淋巴瘤活性。
Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cells (CAR-T) are an outbreaking treatment option for relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are the most common specific toxicities, while severe neutropenia and infections are often observed as well. From March 2020, early G-CSF prophylaxis at day (D) two post-infusion was systematically proposed.
We then compared patients treated before that date who did not receive G-CSF or who received late (after D5) G-CSF as control group. Patients administered with early G-CSF had similar duration of grade 4 neutropenia but significantly decreased incidence of febrile neutropenia (58% versus 81%, p = 0. 018). Similar rate of toxicities was observed, including overall and grade 3-4 CRS (p = 0. 93 and p = 0. 28, respectively), and overall and grade 3-4 ICANS (p = 0. 62 and p = 0. 88, respectively).
We observed no difference in the quality of CAR T-cells expansion (p = 0. 79, %Cmax), nor in response rate (best ORR, 57. 6% vs 61. 8%, p = 0. 93), nor survival even in a group of patients adjusted by a propensity score.
In conclusion, early G-CSF administration was safe and effective in reducing febrile neutropenia without impact on toxicities nor on anti-lymphoma activity of CAR-T.
在 PubMed 查看 → 出版商原文(DOI) 全文 PDF(PMC)· 可下载 治疗专题与资料阅读指南 资料来源与翻译说明 报告译文或资料问题 →
MEMBER ACCOUNT
登录成功会直接打开下一页。